Discussion:
Terrorist simp and traitor Powel spews morality
(too old to reply)
MioMyo
2009-05-25 19:29:49 UTC
Permalink
http://voices.kansascity.com/node/4690
Look at this fucking rightarded terrorist and traitor trying to preach
morality among his fellow Christian terrorists and traitors. Amazing.
That fucker needs to be executed along with his fellow terrorists and
traitors.
According to you, libtard, anyone who doesn't agree with you or has the
audacity to challenge your fascist ideology should be executed. If the world
was reconstituted according to those terms, you'd be the only living being
on the planet.....
Frank Pittel
2009-05-25 20:24:04 UTC
Permalink
In alt.politics.usa.republican MioMyo <***@somewhere.com> wrote:

: "Fredric L. Rice" <***@SkepticTank.Org> wrote in message
: news:pfqdneo-***@posted.sonicnet...
: > http://voices.kansascity.com/node/4690
: >
: > Look at this fucking rightarded terrorist and traitor trying to preach
: > morality among his fellow Christian terrorists and traitors. Amazing.
: > That fucker needs to be executed along with his fellow terrorists and
: > traitors.


: According to you, libtard, anyone who doesn't agree with you or has the
: audacity to challenge your fascist ideology should be executed. If the world
: was reconstituted according to those terms, you'd be the only living being
: on the planet.....

It's the way of fascist to imprison and kill anyone that dares to disagree with
them. It's not permitted to disagree with the fascists. That's why they want to
reimpose<SP?> the "fairness" doctrine. They need to shut up the likes of Rush,
Hannity, Savage, etc.
--
-------------------
Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
MioMyo
2009-05-25 22:12:09 UTC
Permalink
: >http://voices.kansascity.com/node/4690
: >
: > Look at this fucking rightarded terrorist and traitor trying to preach
: > morality among his fellow Christian terrorists and traitors. Amazing.
: > That fucker needs to be executed along with his fellow terrorists and
: > traitors.
: According to you, libtard, anyone who doesn't agree with you or has the
: audacity to challenge your fascist ideology should be executed. If the world
: was reconstituted according to those terms, you'd be the only living being
: on the planet.....
It's the way of fascist to imprison and kill anyone that dares to disagree with
them. It's not permitted to disagree with the fascists. That's why they want to
reimpose<SP?> the "fairness" doctrine. They need to shut up the likes of Rush,
Hannity, Savage, etc.
<>Wrong. It's all the conservative "establishment" Republicans who want
<>the right-wing hate radio idiots - and Dickhead Cheney to just STFU -
<>because they know the more they talk - the more power and control the
<>Dems get. Don't worry - supreme idiots like you aren't expected to
<>understand simple things like this.

If you had a point (though you don't), then Rush having been on the radio
all through the 1990s and FoxNews since mid-90s, both would have had ratings
in the tank by now. However, the opposite is true and the only way liberals
have determined to silence them is to regulate them off the air- draconian
fascism is your vehicle in trashing the first amendment, tard......
P***@SillyWalk.com
2009-05-25 23:38:32 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 25 May 2009 15:12:09 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
If you had a point (though you don't), then Rush having been on the radio
all through the 1990s and FoxNews since mid-90s, both would have had ratings
in the tank by now.
You stupid sot

Rupurt Murdoch targeted a SMALL segment of the American
electorate 18-22% and intended to profit from just
THEIR business or support

That percentatge is still SMALL compared to the other
80% of information dissemination

It has FEW cross line viewers, limited to just
hard-core viewers who care more about being legitimized
by how "news" is crafted, or the Entertainment value of
the pundits who, like any sleazy supermarket tabloid,
run crap likened to seeing Elvis or finding the Lost
Ark.
MioMyo
2009-05-26 00:55:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
On Mon, 25 May 2009 15:12:09 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
If you had a point (though you don't), then Rush having been on the radio
all through the 1990s and FoxNews since mid-90s, both would have had ratings
in the tank by now.
You stupid sot
Rupurt Murdoch targeted a SMALL segment of the American
electorate 18-22% and intended to profit from just
THEIR business or support
That percentatge is still SMALL compared to the other
80% of information dissemination
It has FEW cross line viewers, limited to just
hard-core viewers who care more about being legitimized
by how "news" is crafted, or the Entertainment value of
the pundits who, like any sleazy supermarket tabloid,
run crap likened to seeing Elvis or finding the Lost
Ark.
No source.... no surprise......

Here tard face....

Read it and eat shit:

http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/ratings/


The Scoreboard: Thursday, May 21
25-54 demographic: (L +SD)

Total day: FNC: 337 | CNN: 142 | MSNBC: 114 | HLN: 142

Prime: FNC: 601 | CNN: 211 | MSNBC: 231 | HLN: 280
5p: 6p: 7p: 8p: 9p: 10p: 11p:

FNC Beck: Baier: Shep: O'Reilly: Hannity: Greta: O'Reilly:
478 399 432 768 588 444 456

CNN Blitzer: Blitzer: Dobbs: Brown: King: Cooper: Cooper:
119 143 166 117 247 268 107

MSNBC Matthews: EdShow: Matthews: Olbermann: Maddow: Olbermann:
Maddow:
58 65 197 318 191 184 84

HLN Prime: Prime: VMitchell: Grace: Dobbs: Grace: Showbiz:
103 152 176 381 150 322 196


Data by Nielsen Media Research. Live and same day (DVR) data.
continued...

Posted by Chris | 06:03 PM | Ratings | Email this post | View Comments
Thursday May 21, 2009
The Scoreboard: Wednesday, May 20
25-54 demographic: (L +SD)

Total day: FNC: 315 | CNN: 134 | MSNBC: 116 | HLN: 129

Prime: FNC: 536 | CNN: 137 | MSNBC: 302 | HLN: 216
5p: 6p: 7p: 8p: 9p: 10p: 11p:

FNC Beck: Baier: Shep: O'Reilly: Hannity: Greta: O'Reilly:
445 411 444 694 545 368 524

CNN Blitzer: Blitzer: Dobbs: Brown: King: Cooper: Cooper:
118 123 198 115 144 152 190

MSNBC Matthews: EdShow: Matthews: Olbermann: Maddow: Olbermann:
Maddow:
88 100 228 426 266 213 196

HLN Prime: Prime: VMitchell: Grace: Dobbs: Grace: Showbiz:
96 107 140 301 99 258 246


Data by Nielsen Media Research. Live and same day (DVR) data.
continued...

Posted by SteveK | 04:57 PM | Ratings | Email this post | View Comments
Wednesday May 20, 2009
The Scoreboard: Tuesday, May 19
25-54 demographic: (L +SD)

Total day: FNC: 314 | CNN: 131 | MSNBC: 118 | HLN: 127

Prime: FNC: 531 | CNN: 148 | MSNBC: 208 | HLN: 224
5p: 6p: 7p: 8p: 9p: 10p: 11p:

FNC Beck: Baier: Shep: O'Reilly: Hannity: Greta: O'Reilly:
527 407 462 686 502 406 440

CNN Blitzer: Blitzer: Dobbs: Brown: King: Cooper: Cooper:
201 205 187 119 161 165 172

MSNBC Matthews: EdShow: Matthews: Olbermann: Maddow: Olbermann:
Maddow:
125 88 149 258 212 153 102

HLN Prime: Prime: VMitchell: Grace: Dobbs: Grace: Showbiz:
47 69 231 288 140 257 244


Data by Nielsen Media Research. Live and same day (DVR) data.
continued...

Posted by Chris | 04:48 PM | Ratings | Email this post | View Comments
Tuesday May 19, 2009
The Scoreboard: Monday, May 18
25-54 demographic: (L +SD)

Total day: FNC: 341 | CNN: 156 | MSNBC: 138 | HLN: 129

Prime: FNC: 688 | CNN: 220 | MSNBC: 343 | HLN: 252
5p: 6p: 7p: 8p: 9p: 10p: 11p:

FNC Beck: Baier: Shep: O'Reilly: Hannity: Greta: O'Reilly:
521 387 453 829 753 478 558

CNN Blitzer: Blitzer: Dobbs: Brown: King: Cooper: Cooper:
123 189 192 179 213 268 202

MSNBC Matthews: EdShow: Matthews: Olbermann: Maddow: Olbermann:
Maddow:
103 119 222 427 344 259 135

HLN Prime: Prime: VMitchell: Grace: Dobbs: Grace: Showbiz:
49 87 147 307 140 314 197


Data by Nielsen Media Research. Live and same day (DVR) data.
continued...
P***@SillyWalk.com
2009-05-26 02:17:20 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 25 May 2009 17:55:05 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
Rupurt Murdoch targeted a SMALL segment of the American
electorate 18-22% and intended to profit from just
THEIR business or support
That percentatge is still SMALL compared to the other
80% of information dissemination
It has FEW cross line viewers, limited to just
hard-core viewers who care more about being legitimized
by how "news" is crafted, or the Entertainment value of
the pundits who, like any sleazy supermarket tabloid,
run crap likened to seeing Elvis or finding the Lost
Ark.
No source.... no surprise.....
Common source, no surprise

Faux, Moonie Times, Limpballs are listened or watched
by a "vast majority of about 12%"
MioMyo
2009-05-27 00:37:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
On Mon, 25 May 2009 17:55:05 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
Rupurt Murdoch targeted a SMALL segment of the American
electorate 18-22% and intended to profit from just
THEIR business or support
That percentatge is still SMALL compared to the other
80% of information dissemination
It has FEW cross line viewers, limited to just
hard-core viewers who care more about being legitimized
by how "news" is crafted, or the Entertainment value of
the pundits who, like any sleazy supermarket tabloid,
run crap likened to seeing Elvis or finding the Lost
Ark.
No source.... no surprise.....
Common source, no surprise
Faux, Moonie Times, Limpballs are listened or watched
by a "vast majority of about 12%"
Right, all because you say so, yet can't cite your source. Figures........

Well, it's been fun kicking your ass around tard, but I tire of you because
you are a mental weakling.
sid9
2009-05-27 01:54:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by MioMyo
Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
On Mon, 25 May 2009 17:55:05 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
Rupurt Murdoch targeted a SMALL segment of
the American
electorate 18-22% and intended to profit from
just
THEIR business or support
That percentatge is still SMALL compared to
the other
80% of information dissemination
It has FEW cross line viewers, limited to
just
hard-core viewers who care more about being
legitimized
by how "news" is crafted, or the
Entertainment value of
the pundits who, like any sleazy supermarket
tabloid,
run crap likened to seeing Elvis or finding
the Lost
Ark.
No source.... no surprise.....
Common source, no surprise
Faux, Moonie Times, Limpballs are listened or
watched
by a "vast majority of about 12%"
Right, all because you say so, yet can't cite
your source. Figures........
Well, it's been fun kicking your ass around
tard, but I tire of you because you are a mental
weakling.
AM radio is dying.

It's few listeners listen when they are in their
vehicles.
MioMyo
2009-05-28 00:36:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by sid9
Post by MioMyo
Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
On Mon, 25 May 2009 17:55:05 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
Rupurt Murdoch targeted a SMALL segment of the American
electorate 18-22% and intended to profit from just
THEIR business or support
That percentatge is still SMALL compared to the other
80% of information dissemination
It has FEW cross line viewers, limited to just
hard-core viewers who care more about being legitimized
by how "news" is crafted, or the Entertainment value of
the pundits who, like any sleazy supermarket tabloid,
run crap likened to seeing Elvis or finding the Lost
Ark.
No source.... no surprise.....
Common source, no surprise
Faux, Moonie Times, Limpballs are listened or watched
by a "vast majority of about 12%"
Right, all because you say so, yet can't cite your source.
Figures........
Well, it's been fun kicking your ass around tard, but I tire of you
because you are a mental weakling.
AM radio is dying.
Cite? or you too are just another blow-hard bloviating out your ass, AS
USUAL!
Post by sid9
It's few listeners listen when they are in their vehicles.
And make sure your citation is credible, that is if you even bother with an
attempt at redemption.
sid9
2009-05-28 00:49:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by MioMyo
Post by sid9
Post by MioMyo
Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
On Mon, 25 May 2009 17:55:05 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
Rupurt Murdoch targeted a SMALL segment of
the American
electorate 18-22% and intended to profit
from just
THEIR business or support
That percentatge is still SMALL compared to
the other
80% of information dissemination
It has FEW cross line viewers, limited to
just
hard-core viewers who care more about being
legitimized
by how "news" is crafted, or the
Entertainment value of
the pundits who, like any sleazy
supermarket tabloid,
run crap likened to seeing Elvis or finding
the Lost
Ark.
No source.... no surprise.....
Common source, no surprise
Faux, Moonie Times, Limpballs are listened or
watched
by a "vast majority of about 12%"
Right, all because you say so, yet can't cite
your source. Figures........
Well, it's been fun kicking your ass around
tard, but I tire of you because you are a
mental weakling.
AM radio is dying.
Cite? or you too are just another blow-hard
bloviating out your ass, AS USUAL!
Post by sid9
It's few listeners listen when they are in
their vehicles.
And make sure your citation is credible, that is
if you even bother with an attempt at
redemption.
I know it first hand, but for you...

You may GOOGLE "AM Radio dying"
and get over a million hits.
MioMyo
2009-05-28 11:14:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by sid9
Post by MioMyo
Post by sid9
Post by MioMyo
Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
On Mon, 25 May 2009 17:55:05 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
Rupurt Murdoch targeted a SMALL segment of the American
electorate 18-22% and intended to profit from just
THEIR business or support
That percentatge is still SMALL compared to the other
80% of information dissemination
It has FEW cross line viewers, limited to just
hard-core viewers who care more about being legitimized
by how "news" is crafted, or the Entertainment value of
the pundits who, like any sleazy supermarket tabloid,
run crap likened to seeing Elvis or finding the Lost
Ark.
No source.... no surprise.....
Common source, no surprise
Faux, Moonie Times, Limpballs are listened or watched
by a "vast majority of about 12%"
Right, all because you say so, yet can't cite your source.
Figures........
Well, it's been fun kicking your ass around tard, but I tire of you
because you are a mental weakling.
AM radio is dying.
Cite? or you too are just another blow-hard bloviating out your ass, AS
USUAL!
Post by sid9
It's few listeners listen when they are in their vehicles.
And make sure your citation is credible, that is if you even bother with
an attempt at redemption.
I know it first hand, but for you...
You may GOOGLE "AM Radio dying"
and get over a million hits.
You may either cite your proof or be considered a LIAR for the UMPTEENTH
time!
sid9
2009-05-28 12:03:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by MioMyo
Post by sid9
Post by MioMyo
Post by sid9
Post by MioMyo
Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
On Mon, 25 May 2009 17:55:05 -0700,
"MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
Rupurt Murdoch targeted a SMALL segment
of the American
electorate 18-22% and intended to profit
from just
THEIR business or support
That percentatge is still SMALL compared
to the other
80% of information dissemination
It has FEW cross line viewers, limited to
just
hard-core viewers who care more about
being legitimized
by how "news" is crafted, or the
Entertainment value of
the pundits who, like any sleazy
supermarket tabloid,
run crap likened to seeing Elvis or
finding the Lost
Ark.
No source.... no surprise.....
Common source, no surprise
Faux, Moonie Times, Limpballs are listened
or watched
by a "vast majority of about 12%"
Right, all because you say so, yet can't
cite your source. Figures........
Well, it's been fun kicking your ass around
tard, but I tire of you because you are a
mental weakling.
AM radio is dying.
Cite? or you too are just another blow-hard
bloviating out your ass, AS USUAL!
Post by sid9
It's few listeners listen when they are in
their vehicles.
And make sure your citation is credible, that
is if you even bother with an attempt at
redemption.
I know it first hand, but for you...
You may GOOGLE "AM Radio dying"
and get over a million hits.
You may either cite your proof or be considered
a LIAR for the UMPTEENTH time!
Post some sites that indicate that AM radio is
flourishing.

Challenge my facts with a rebuttal instead of name
calling.
MioMyo
2009-05-29 00:48:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by MioMyo
Post by sid9
You may GOOGLE "AM Radio dying"
and get over a million hits.
You may either cite your proof or be considered a LIAR for the UMPTEENTH
time!
Post some sites that indicate that AM radio is flourishing.
Why should I since I never said it was, or that it wasn't. You are the one
making a claim while having no facts to support it.
Challenge my facts with a rebuttal instead of name calling.
Like I said either you have proof of what you said or you pulled it from
your ass. And once again, you prove (not me) it came from inside your
anus.......
P***@SillyWalk.com
2009-05-29 01:01:59 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 28 May 2009 17:48:26 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
Like I said either you have proof of what you said or you pulled it from
your ass. And once again, you prove (not me) it came from inside your
anus.......
Sure as shit couldn't pully anything from yours with
the number of rightwing dicks up there---it's jammed,
Whineo.
sid9
2009-05-29 01:08:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by MioMyo
Post by sid9
Post by MioMyo
Post by sid9
You may GOOGLE "AM Radio dying"
and get over a million hits.
You may either cite your proof or be
considered a LIAR for the UMPTEENTH time!
Post some sites that indicate that AM radio is
flourishing.
Why should I since I never said it was, or that
it wasn't. You are the one making a claim while
having no facts to support it.
Post by sid9
Challenge my facts with a rebuttal instead of
name calling.
Like I said either you have proof of what you
said or you pulled it from your ass. And once
again, you prove (not me) it came from inside
your anus.......
I got a million hits with "AM Radio dying" at
GOOGLE

Try it you might like it...perhaps you'll find an
entry that disputes my statement
MioMyo
2009-05-29 01:51:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by MioMyo
Post by MioMyo
Post by sid9
You may GOOGLE "AM Radio dying"
and get over a million hits.
You may either cite your proof or be considered a LIAR for the
UMPTEENTH time!
Post some sites that indicate that AM radio is flourishing.
Why should I since I never said it was, or that it wasn't. You are the
one making a claim while having no facts to support it.
Challenge my facts with a rebuttal instead of name calling.
Like I said either you have proof of what you said or you pulled it from
your ass. And once again, you prove (not me) it came from inside your
anus.......
I got a million hits with "AM Radio dying" at GOOGLE
Yet you fail to cite one...... Can you cite anything credible which explains
why Conservatives like Rush, Hannity & Hewitt clean house in the ratings up
against competing liberals?

Can you explain why FoxNews kicks ass up against MSNBC & CNN?
Try it you might like it...perhaps you'll find an entry that disputes my
statement
I google all the time, but it's not my responsibility to prove or disprove
your claims.

Obviously you have no deductive reasoning intellect whatsoever which is why
you think otherwise.....
sid9
2009-05-29 03:33:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by MioMyo
Post by sid9
Post by MioMyo
Post by sid9
Post by MioMyo
Post by sid9
You may GOOGLE "AM Radio dying"
and get over a million hits.
You may either cite your proof or be
considered a LIAR for the UMPTEENTH time!
Post some sites that indicate that AM radio
is flourishing.
Why should I since I never said it was, or
that it wasn't. You are the one making a
claim while having no facts to support it.
Post by sid9
Challenge my facts with a rebuttal instead of
name calling.
Like I said either you have proof of what you
said or you pulled it from your ass. And once
again, you prove (not me) it came from inside
your anus.......
I got a million hits with "AM Radio dying" at
GOOGLE
Yet you fail to cite one...... Can you cite
anything credible which explains why
Conservatives like Rush, Hannity & Hewitt clean
house in the ratings up against competing
liberals?
=================================
Are you afraid to GOOGLE and learn that I'm right
about the vanishing AM Radio audience?
=================================
Post by MioMyo
Can you explain why FoxNews kicks ass up against
MSNBC & CNN?
==================================
A diversion! (not unusual from those losing an
argument)

Those are Cable TV...we're discussing AM Radio.

RRRs attention span nearly non-existent
==================================
Post by MioMyo
Post by sid9
Try it you might like it...perhaps you'll find
an entry that disputes my statement
I google all the time, but it's not my
responsibility to prove or disprove your claims.
Obviously you have no deductive reasoning
intellect whatsoever which is why you think
otherwise.....
==============================
You fear that you will find that I am right.

The AM radio audience is insignificant and
shrinking.

Since you are an RRR you are not responsible for
anything.
==============================
MioMyo
2009-05-29 10:08:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by sid9
Post by MioMyo
Post by MioMyo
Post by MioMyo
Post by sid9
You may GOOGLE "AM Radio dying"
and get over a million hits.
You may either cite your proof or be considered a LIAR for the
UMPTEENTH time!
Post some sites that indicate that AM radio is flourishing.
Why should I since I never said it was, or that it wasn't. You are the
one making a claim while having no facts to support it.
Challenge my facts with a rebuttal instead of name calling.
Like I said either you have proof of what you said or you pulled it
from your ass. And once again, you prove (not me) it came from inside
your anus.......
I got a million hits with "AM Radio dying" at GOOGLE
Yet you fail to cite one...... Can you cite anything credible which
explains why Conservatives like Rush, Hannity & Hewitt clean house in the
ratings up against competing liberals?
=================================
Are you afraid to GOOGLE and learn that I'm right about the vanishing AM
Radio audience?
=================================
Are you so inept that you can't support your assertions yourself, and with
something credible at that?

BTW- you can plug any combination of words into google and get millions of
hits. That however is no proof of the search parameter voracity, you
ignorant f_ck.....
Post by sid9
Post by MioMyo
Can you explain why FoxNews kicks ass up against MSNBC & CNN?
==================================
A diversion! (not unusual from those losing an argument)
You're still not supporting your assertion, tard. Why not or is lying your
second nature.
Post by sid9
Those are Cable TV...we're discussing AM Radio.
RRRs attention span nearly non-existent
==================================
Post by MioMyo
Try it you might like it...perhaps you'll find an entry that disputes my
statement
I google all the time, but it's not my responsibility to prove or
disprove your claims.
Obviously you have no deductive reasoning intellect whatsoever which is
why you think otherwise.....
==============================
You fear that you will find that I am right.
I fear nothing of the sort. But you, you make claims, pulling them out of
your ass and expect others to do your reseach.
Post by sid9
The AM radio audience is insignificant and shrinking.
Since you are an RRR you are not responsible for anything.
Tell everyone how you're taking responsibility for your own self, tard since
you can only run away from proving your claim. Furthermore, your claim that
Am radio is dying, whether it is or not, is utterly irrelevant, except to
you.
Post by sid9
==============================
Fredric L. Rice
2009-05-31 20:15:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by sid9
Post by MioMyo
Yet you fail to cite one...... Can you cite
anything credible which explains why
Conservatives like Rush, Hannity & Hewitt clean
house in the ratings up against competing
liberals?
Are you afraid to GOOGLE and learn that I'm right
about the vanishing AM Radio audience?
Reality has a well-known liberal bias, and Google is part of the liberal
conspiracy. Rightards won't use Google because they might learn something.
And that's against Party policy.

---
More Christanic terrorism:
http://www.kansascity.com/116/story/1225769.html?storylink=omni_popular
kujebak
2009-05-31 21:32:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Fredric L. Rice
Post by sid9
Post by MioMyo
Yet you fail to cite one...... Can you cite
anything credible which explains why
Conservatives like Rush, Hannity & Hewitt clean
house in the ratings up against competing
liberals?
Are you afraid to GOOGLE and learn that I'm right
about the vanishing AM Radio audience?
Reality has a well-known liberal bias, and Google is part of the liberal
conspiracy.  Rightards won't use Google because they might learn something.
And that's against Party policy.
---
More Christanic terrorism:http://www.kansascity.com/116/story/1225769.html?storylink=omni_popular
Your sardonic statement contains an unintended grain
of truth. Conservatism is a natural frame of mind. It is
collectivism which requires indoctrination ;-)
Lamont Cranston
2009-05-29 14:47:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by sid9
Post by MioMyo
Post by sid9
Post by MioMyo
Post by sid9
You may GOOGLE "AM Radio dying"
and get over a million hits.
You may either cite your proof or be
considered a LIAR for the UMPTEENTH time!
Post some sites that indicate that AM radio is
flourishing.
Why should I since I never said it was, or that
it wasn't. You are the one making a claim while
having no facts to support it.
Post by sid9
Challenge my facts with a rebuttal instead of
name calling.
Like I said either you have proof of what you
said or you pulled it from your ass. And once
again, you prove (not me) it came from inside
your anus.......
I got a million hits with "AM Radio dying" at
GOOGLE
Try it you might like it...perhaps you'll find an
entry that disputes my statement
That's probably not a reasonable measure of anything. I got
304,000 hits with "AM Radio thriving."
P***@SillyWalk.com
2009-05-28 02:22:02 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 27 May 2009 17:36:05 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
Post by sid9
AM radio is dying.
Cite? or you too are just another blow-hard bloviating out your ass, AS
USUAL!
Well, it's not dying for those poor rightwing assholes
who DEPEND on someone telling them that their boat
isn't sinking (as the bail water as fast as they can)
Raygoon in Hell
2009-05-26 02:09:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by MioMyo
: >http://voices.kansascity.com/node/4690
: >
: > Look at this fucking rightarded terrorist and traitor trying to preach
: > morality among his fellow Christian terrorists and traitors. Amazing.
: > That fucker needs to be executed along with his fellow terrorists and
: > traitors.
: According to you, libtard, anyone who doesn't agree with you or has the
: audacity to challenge your fascist ideology should be executed. If the world
: was reconstituted according to those terms, you'd be the only living being
: on the planet.....
It's the way of fascist to imprison and kill anyone that dares to disagree with
them. It's not permitted to disagree with the fascists. That's why they want to
reimpose<SP?> the "fairness" doctrine. They need to shut up the likes of Rush,
Hannity, Savage, etc.
<>Wrong. It's all the conservative "establishment" Republicans who want
<>the right-wing hate radio idiots - and Dickhead Cheney to just STFU -
<>because they know the more they talk - the more power and control the
<>Dems get. Don't worry - supreme idiots like you aren't expected to
<>understand simple things like this.
If you had a point (though you don't), then Rush having been on the radio
all through the 1990s and FoxNews since mid-90s, both would have had
ratings in the tank by now. However, the opposite is true and the only way
liberals have determined to silence them is to regulate them off the air-
draconian fascism is your vehicle in trashing the first amendment,
tard......
Their ratings are a joke. 1% of America, if that, watch FOX.
P***@SillyWalk.com
2009-05-25 23:34:52 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 25 May 2009 15:24:04 -0500, Frank Pittel
Post by Frank Pittel
: According to you, libtard, anyone who doesn't agree with you or has the
: audacity to challenge your fascist ideology should be executed. If the world
: was reconstituted according to those terms, you'd be the only living being
: on the planet.....
It's the way of fascist to imprison and kill anyone that dares to disagree with
them. It's not permitted to disagree with the fascists. That's why they want to
reimpose<SP?> the "fairness" doctrine. They need to shut up the likes of Rush,
Hannity, Savage, etc.
Wrong again

The air waves belong to all americans

When they become flooded with rightwing extremism and
harmful propaganda, it is clear that some form of
regulation should be required

That could have done wonders in Prewar Germany in the
20's and 30's----
MioMyo
2009-05-26 01:04:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
On Mon, 25 May 2009 15:24:04 -0500, Frank Pittel
Post by Frank Pittel
: According to you, libtard, anyone who doesn't agree with you or has the
: audacity to challenge your fascist ideology should be executed. If the world
: was reconstituted according to those terms, you'd be the only living being
: on the planet.....
It's the way of fascist to imprison and kill anyone that dares to disagree with
them. It's not permitted to disagree with the fascists. That's why they want to
reimpose<SP?> the "fairness" doctrine. They need to shut up the likes of Rush,
Hannity, Savage, etc.
Wrong again
The air waves belong to all americans
When they become flooded with rightwing extremism and
harmful propaganda, it is clear that some form of
regulation should be required
Who is the arbitor that the airwaves are flooded with Rightwing Extremism?

Who is the arbitor it is propaganda and harmful?

It is the free market listenership that determines what stays and what goes.
What you are suggesting is nothing short of State Sanctioned censorship and
it is who decides what is and is not harmful that would be filtered through
a politically correct filtered state regulators.
Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
That could have done wonders in Prewar Germany in the
20's and 30's----
The people have decided with the free market, tard.

Choke on it:

http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/ratings/
The Scoreboard: Thursday, May 21
25-54 demographic: (L +SD)

Total day: FNC: 337 | CNN: 142 | MSNBC: 114 | HLN: 142

Prime: FNC: 601 | CNN: 211 | MSNBC: 231 | HLN: 280
5p: 6p: 7p: 8p: 9p: 10p: 11p:

FNC Beck: Baier: Shep: O'Reilly: Hannity: Greta: O'Reilly:
478 399 432 768 588 444 456

CNN Blitzer: Blitzer: Dobbs: Brown: King: Cooper: Cooper:
119 143 166 117 247 268 107

MSNBC Matthews: EdShow: Matthews: Olbermann: Maddow: Olbermann:
Maddow:
58 65 197 318 191 184 84

HLN Prime: Prime: VMitchell: Grace: Dobbs: Grace: Showbiz:
103 152 176 381 150 322 196


Data by Nielsen Media Research. Live and same day (DVR) data.
continued...

Posted by Chris | 06:03 PM | Ratings | Email this post | View Comments
Thursday May 21, 2009
The Scoreboard: Wednesday, May 20
25-54 demographic: (L +SD)

Total day: FNC: 315 | CNN: 134 | MSNBC: 116 | HLN: 129

Prime: FNC: 536 | CNN: 137 | MSNBC: 302 | HLN: 216
5p: 6p: 7p: 8p: 9p: 10p: 11p:

FNC Beck: Baier: Shep: O'Reilly: Hannity: Greta: O'Reilly:
445 411 444 694 545 368 524

CNN Blitzer: Blitzer: Dobbs: Brown: King: Cooper: Cooper:
118 123 198 115 144 152 190

MSNBC Matthews: EdShow: Matthews: Olbermann: Maddow: Olbermann:
Maddow:
88 100 228 426 266 213 196

HLN Prime: Prime: VMitchell: Grace: Dobbs: Grace: Showbiz:
96 107 140 301 99 258 246


Data by Nielsen Media Research. Live and same day (DVR) data.
continued...

Posted by SteveK | 04:57 PM | Ratings | Email this post | View Comments
Wednesday May 20, 2009
The Scoreboard: Tuesday, May 19
25-54 demographic: (L +SD)

Total day: FNC: 314 | CNN: 131 | MSNBC: 118 | HLN: 127

Prime: FNC: 531 | CNN: 148 | MSNBC: 208 | HLN: 224
5p: 6p: 7p: 8p: 9p: 10p: 11p:

FNC Beck: Baier: Shep: O'Reilly: Hannity: Greta: O'Reilly:
527 407 462 686 502 406 440

CNN Blitzer: Blitzer: Dobbs: Brown: King: Cooper: Cooper:
201 205 187 119 161 165 172

MSNBC Matthews: EdShow: Matthews: Olbermann: Maddow: Olbermann:
Maddow:
125 88 149 258 212 153 102

HLN Prime: Prime: VMitchell: Grace: Dobbs: Grace: Showbiz:
47 69 231 288 140 257 244


Data by Nielsen Media Research. Live and same day (DVR) data.
continued...

Posted by Chris | 04:48 PM | Ratings | Email this post | View Comments
Tuesday May 19, 2009
The Scoreboard: Monday, May 18
25-54 demographic: (L +SD)

Total day: FNC: 341 | CNN: 156 | MSNBC: 138 | HLN: 129

Prime: FNC: 688 | CNN: 220 | MSNBC: 343 | HLN: 252
5p: 6p: 7p: 8p: 9p: 10p: 11p:

FNC Beck: Baier: Shep: O'Reilly: Hannity: Greta: O'Reilly:
521 387 453 829 753 478 558

CNN Blitzer: Blitzer: Dobbs: Brown: King: Cooper: Cooper:
123 189 192 179 213 268 202

MSNBC Matthews: EdShow: Matthews: Olbermann: Maddow: Olbermann:
Maddow:
103 119 222 427 344 259 135

HLN Prime: Prime: VMitchell: Grace: Dobbs: Grace: Showbiz:
49 87 147 307 140 314 197


Data by Nielsen Media Research. Live and same day (DVR) data.
continued...
P***@SillyWalk.com
2009-05-26 02:16:06 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 25 May 2009 18:04:58 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
The air waves belong to all americans
When they become flooded with rightwing extremism and
harmful propaganda, it is clear that some form of
regulation should be required
Who is the arbitor that the airwaves are flooded with Rightwing Extremism?
The American people

As it stands today---the number of actual viewers of
limpballs and Faux stands at about 12% of the entire
American electorate.

In a competitive business, the lack of profit would
normally dictate survival

However, Murdoch, Scaife, Moon, and the GOP are
artificially propping up losing stations.
Miles Long
2009-05-26 14:19:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
On Mon, 25 May 2009 18:04:58 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
The air waves belong to all americans
When they become flooded with rightwing extremism and
harmful propaganda, it is clear that some form of
regulation should be required
Who is the arbitor that the airwaves are flooded with Rightwing Extremism?
The American people
As it stands today---the number of actual viewers of
limpballs and Faux stands at about 12% of the entire
American electorate.
In a competitive business, the lack of profit would
normally dictate survival
However, Murdoch, Scaife, Moon, and the GOP are
artificially propping up losing stations.
And losing political offices as well. BTW, someone let MooMoo know
that the word is spelled 'arbiter.' <laughing>

Judging by the losses of the Republican Party of late, I hope the entire
lot of them are on the air forever, it is only helping Democrats AND
Liberals at the polls.

Miles "Merriam-Webster" Long
MioMyo
2009-05-27 01:14:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Miles Long
Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
On Mon, 25 May 2009 18:04:58 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
The air waves belong to all americans
When they become flooded with rightwing extremism and
harmful propaganda, it is clear that some form of
regulation should be required
Who is the arbitor that the airwaves are flooded with Rightwing Extremism?
The American people
As it stands today---the number of actual viewers of
limpballs and Faux stands at about 12% of the entire
American electorate.
In a competitive business, the lack of profit would
normally dictate survival
However, Murdoch, Scaife, Moon, and the GOP are
artificially propping up losing stations.
And losing political offices as well. BTW, someone let MooMoo know
that the word is spelled 'arbiter.' <laughing>
An irrelevant point, but do revelle in one victory over the years, wrong....
Post by Miles Long
Judging by the losses of the Republican Party of late, I hope the entire
lot of them are on the air forever, it is only helping Democrats AND
Liberals at the polls.
Your back handed way of acknowledging that poop is an ignorant f_ck when it
comes to this topic is but anotheer hoot.....
Post by Miles Long
Miles "Merriam-Webster" Long
For a net spelling cop, when have you ever corrected someone with whom you
politically agree? I have yet to see one wrong.....
Miles Long
2009-06-01 03:03:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by MioMyo
Post by Miles Long
Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
On Mon, 25 May 2009 18:04:58 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
The air waves belong to all americans
When they become flooded with rightwing extremism and
harmful propaganda, it is clear that some form of
regulation should be required
Who is the arbitor that the airwaves are flooded with Rightwing Extremism?
The American people
As it stands today---the number of actual viewers of
limpballs and Faux stands at about 12% of the entire
American electorate.
In a competitive business, the lack of profit would
normally dictate survival
However, Murdoch, Scaife, Moon, and the GOP are
artificially propping up losing stations.
And losing political offices as well. BTW, someone let MooMoo know
that the word is spelled 'arbiter.' <laughing>
An irrelevant point, but do revelle in one victory over the years, wrong....
Post by Miles Long
Judging by the losses of the Republican Party of late, I hope the entire
lot of them are on the air forever, it is only helping Democrats AND
Liberals at the polls.
Your back handed way of acknowledging that poop is an ignorant f_ck when
it comes to this topic is but anotheer hoot.....
Post by Miles Long
Miles "Merriam-Webster" Long
For a net spelling cop, when have you ever corrected someone with whom
you politically agree? I have yet to see one wrong.....
The people with whom I agree have all finished school, have achieved
intellectual competence with the English language (here in the US), and
check what they write BEFORE clicking on <send>.

Folks like you, however, cannot competently present cogent arguments
that support your contentions. Your lack of collective reasoning
skills have amused millions over the past few years.

However, I encourage you to continue your efforts. They serve as a
constant reminder of just why your ranks have been dwindling down to
the most pitifully shrill. Keep up the good work...it's great for a
laugh.

Miles "Reality Has A Liberal Bias" Long
MioMyo
2009-06-02 11:00:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Miles Long
Post by MioMyo
Post by Miles Long
Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
On Mon, 25 May 2009 18:04:58 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
The air waves belong to all americans
When they become flooded with rightwing extremism and
harmful propaganda, it is clear that some form of
regulation should be required
Who is the arbitor that the airwaves are flooded with Rightwing Extremism?
The American people
As it stands today---the number of actual viewers of
limpballs and Faux stands at about 12% of the entire
American electorate.
In a competitive business, the lack of profit would
normally dictate survival
However, Murdoch, Scaife, Moon, and the GOP are
artificially propping up losing stations.
And losing political offices as well. BTW, someone let MooMoo know
that the word is spelled 'arbiter.' <laughing>
An irrelevant point, but do revelle in one victory over the years, wrong....
Post by Miles Long
Judging by the losses of the Republican Party of late, I hope the entire
lot of them are on the air forever, it is only helping Democrats AND
Liberals at the polls.
Your back handed way of acknowledging that poop is an ignorant f_ck when
it comes to this topic is but anotheer hoot.....
Post by Miles Long
Miles "Merriam-Webster" Long
For a net spelling cop, when have you ever corrected someone with whom
you politically agree? I have yet to see one wrong.....
The people with whom I agree have all finished school, have achieved
intellectual competence with the English language (here in the US), and
check what they write BEFORE clicking on <send>.
That's your first lie...............
Post by Miles Long
Folks like you, however, cannot competently present cogent arguments
that support your contentions. Your lack of collective reasoning
skills have amused millions over the past few years.
Smug elitism is your pitiful excuse for justisfying your ideological
nonsense.............
Post by Miles Long
However, I encourage you to continue your efforts.
Golly guber, that's for that.... and here I would have thought the
Constitution gave me the right to my opinion, nit some hate-spewing
libtard...... <Laughing>
Post by Miles Long
They serve as a
constant reminder of just why your ranks have been dwindling down to
the most pitifully shrill. Keep up the good work...it's great for a
laugh.
Dwindling is how liberals characterize long established cyclical political
patterns since you cannot ever imagine your ilk out of your birth-right
throne of power.
Post by Miles Long
Miles "Reality Has A Liberal Bias" Long
Facts are but stubborn inconveniences for the elitist liberal mindset......
MioMyo
2009-05-27 01:10:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
On Mon, 25 May 2009 18:04:58 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
The air waves belong to all americans
When they become flooded with rightwing extremism and
harmful propaganda, it is clear that some form of
regulation should be required
Who is the arbitor that the airwaves are flooded with Rightwing Extremism?
The American people
Which is what happens via the rating system, the American people decide.
Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
As it stands today---the number of actual viewers of
limpballs and Faux stands at about 12% of the entire
American electorate.
Also as it stands today, 100% of Americans have the option to watch FoxNews,
Limbaugh, Chris Matthews, Keith Olbermann, Hannity etc. Under some system
of the Fairness doctrine, a panel would decide what should be available.

Also as it stands today, should a program not have enough viewers, the free
market weeds them out.
Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
In a competitive business, the lack of profit would
normally dictate survival
Not according to the ratings....

You know the ones you just deleted because you can't handle the truth......
Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
However, Murdoch, Scaife, Moon, and the GOP are
artificially propping up losing stations.
Proof?
P***@SillyWalk.com
2009-05-25 23:33:21 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 25 May 2009 12:29:49 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
http://voices.kansascity.com/node/4690
Look at this fucking rightarded terrorist and traitor trying to preach
morality among his fellow Christian terrorists and traitors. Amazing.
That fucker needs to be executed along with his fellow terrorists and
traitors.
According to you, libtard, anyone who doesn't agree with you or has the
audacity to challenge your fascist ideology should be executed.
No, there again I point out that you just described the
RIGHTWING Conservative behavior of totalitarians,
Whineo

You simply don't have the intellectual ability to deal
with complex things, do you?
Loading...