U.S. Attorney's office tells employees not to log on to Drudge Report

[MioMyo]

The U.S. Attorney's Office in Massachusetts directed employees earlierthis
month not to log onto the Drudge Report website with government-issued
computers due to potential viruses on the site.

In an e-mail message sent May 4, Paul Harvey, an information-technology
official for the Boston office, wrote that securityspecialists with the U.S.
Attorney's Office at the Department ofJustice asked them "to
reformat/reimage two computers because the uservisited the drudgereport.com
site."

"Please avoid the Drudgereport website from the [United StatesAttorney's
Office] computers," Harvey wrote.

Harvey said that if employees had a "work-related reason to visit thesite,"
access could be provided off the government network.

Asked why the conservative-leaning news aggregator and PresidentBarack Obama
critic was flagged by Internet security officials, TracySchmaler, a
Department of Justice spokeswoman, said it was because "amalicious code was
found contained in a Web ad on Drudge."

Schmaler also said the request to stay off Drudge wasn't
politicallymotivated and said it was sent only to the office in
Massachusetts.She also said other popular sites were later found to have
potentialviruses, including ESPN.com.

Read more: "U.S. Attorney's office tells employees not to log on to
Drudge Report - Jonathan Martin - POLITICO.com" -
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0509/22574.html#ixzz0Fbq167cH&A

Good advice.

I suppose your good advice would include an hourly log-on to the daily kos,
move-on, the keith olbermann propaganda hour etc.

The only thing Drudge is qualified to report on is gay s&m. Kinda like
you, Gerald.

Drudge is nothing more or less than a clearing house that links news
stories, columnists etc. from an abundant of sources without regard to
political affiliation. Occasionally Drudge leaks a news story (usually right
though sometime inaccurate) and libs have had their panties in a twist about
Drudge ever since he leaked the ACCURATE Monica-Clinton dick sucking story.

I notice this libtard went out of his way to delete the story here which
tells a story in itself.

[Larry Hewitt]

Post by MioMyo
The U.S. Attorney's Office in Massachusetts directed employees
earlierthis month not to log onto the Drudge Report website with
government-issued computers due to potential viruses on the site.
In an e-mail message sent May 4, Paul Harvey, an information-technology
official for the Boston office, wrote that securityspecialists with the
U.S. Attorney's Office at the Department ofJustice asked them "to
reformat/reimage two computers because the uservisited the
drudgereport.com site."
"Please avoid the Drudgereport website from the [United StatesAttorney's
Office] computers," Harvey wrote.
Harvey said that if employees had a "work-related reason to visit
thesite," access could be provided off the government network.
Asked why the conservative-leaning news aggregator and PresidentBarack
Obama critic was flagged by Internet security officials, TracySchmaler,
a Department of Justice spokeswoman, said it was because "amalicious
code was found contained in a Web ad on Drudge."
Schmaler also said the request to stay off Drudge wasn't
politicallymotivated and said it was sent only to the office in
Massachusetts.She also said other popular sites were later found to have
potentialviruses, including ESPN.com.
Read more: "U.S. Attorney's office tells employees not to log on to
Drudge Report - Jonathan Martin - POLITICO.com" -
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0509/22574.html#ixzz0Fbq167cH&A

Good advice.

I suppose your good advice would include an hourly log-on to the daily
kos, move-on, the keith olbermann propaganda hour etc.

Nope.

But them they are at least professional enough to not sell ad space to
hackers.

I object to my taxpayer dollars being used by ANY federal employee to
goof of while on the payroll.

My PRIVATE employer would fire me if I visited ANY web site during
office hours not a part of my job.

Why do you advocate federal employees goofing off on the job?

Larry

Post by MioMyo

The only thing Drudge is qualified to report on is gay s&m. Kinda like
you, Gerald.

Drudge is nothing more or less than a clearing house that links news
stories, columnists etc. from an abundant of sources without regard to
political affiliation. Occasionally Drudge leaks a news story (usually
right though sometime inaccurate) and libs have had their panties in a
twist about Drudge ever since he leaked the ACCURATE Monica-Clinton dick
sucking story.
I notice this libtard went out of his way to delete the story here which
tells a story in itself.

[MioMyo]

Post by Larry Hewitt

Post by MioMyo
The U.S. Attorney's Office in Massachusetts directed employees
earlierthis month not to log onto the Drudge Report website with
government-issued computers due to potential viruses on the site.
In an e-mail message sent May 4, Paul Harvey, an information-technology
official for the Boston office, wrote that securityspecialists with the
U.S. Attorney's Office at the Department ofJustice asked them "to
reformat/reimage two computers because the uservisited the
drudgereport.com site."
"Please avoid the Drudgereport website from the [United StatesAttorney's
Office] computers," Harvey wrote.
Harvey said that if employees had a "work-related reason to visit
thesite," access could be provided off the government network.
Asked why the conservative-leaning news aggregator and PresidentBarack
Obama critic was flagged by Internet security officials, TracySchmaler, a
Department of Justice spokeswoman, said it was because "amalicious code
was found contained in a Web ad on Drudge."
Schmaler also said the request to stay off Drudge wasn't
politicallymotivated and said it was sent only to the office in
Massachusetts.She also said other popular sites were later found to have
potentialviruses, including ESPN.com.
Read more: "U.S. Attorney's office tells employees not to log on to
Drudge Report - Jonathan Martin - POLITICO.com" -
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0509/22574.html#ixzz0Fbq167cH&A

Good advice.

I suppose your good advice would include an hourly log-on to the daily
kos, move-on, the keith olbermann propaganda hour etc.

Nope.
But them they are at least professional enough to not sell ad space to
hackers.

Who are you claiming sells ad space to hackers and what is your proof?

Post by Larry Hewitt
I object to my taxpayer dollars being used by ANY federal employee to goof
of while on the payroll.

Government employees should be using government computers solely for work
related purposes period.

Post by Larry Hewitt
My PRIVATE employer would fire me if I visited ANY web site during office
hours not a part of my job.
Why do you advocate federal employees goofing off on the job?

I don't, but you're welcome to cite me where I said so much.....
waiting.....

Better question is why is the AG office singling out one web site? Shouldn't
the policy be government computers on government time for ONLY government
business?

Post by Larry Hewitt
Larry

Post by MioMyo

The only thing Drudge is qualified to report on is gay s&m. Kinda like
you, Gerald.

Drudge is nothing more or less than a clearing house that links news
stories, columnists etc. from an abundant of sources without regard to
political affiliation. Occasionally Drudge leaks a news story (usually
right though sometime inaccurate) and libs have had their panties in a
twist about Drudge ever since he leaked the ACCURATE Monica-Clinton dick
sucking story.
I notice this libtard went out of his way to delete the story here which
tells a story in itself.

[P***@SillyWalk.com]

On Sat, 16 May 2009 06:19:42 -0700, "MioMyo"

Post by MioMyo
Government employees should be using government computers solely for work
related purposes period.

But spending $150 million to smear clinton in a dozen
or so sham "investigations" was okay with you?

[MioMyo]

Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
On Sat, 16 May 2009 06:19:42 -0700, "MioMyo"

Post by MioMyo
Government employees should be using government computers solely for work
related purposes period.

But spending $150 million to smear clinton in a dozen
or so sham "investigations" was okay with you?

Impeachment is not a function of congress?

[P***@SillyWalk.com]

On Sat, 16 May 2009 12:32:49 -0700, "MioMyo"

Post by MioMyo

Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
But spending $150 million to smear clinton in a dozen
or so sham "investigations" was okay with you?

Impeachment is not a function of congress?

Impeachment is the function of a political party to
PROTECT America from a "clear and present danger"
involving POTUS--It's a POLITICAL process---not a legal
process.

No such danger EVER existed, nor any credible evidence
of ANY wrongdoing was EVER discovered (except in the
dreams and/or hopes of the political party Clinton was
kicking)

[MioMyo]

Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
On Sat, 16 May 2009 12:32:49 -0700, "MioMyo"

Post by MioMyo

Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
But spending $150 million to smear clinton in a dozen
or so sham "investigations" was okay with you?

Impeachment is not a function of congress?

Impeachment is the function of a political party to
PROTECT America from a "clear and present danger"
involving POTUS--It's a POLITICAL process---not a legal
process.

Not according to the Constitution- It says NOTHING with regard to
impeachment being a function of a political party nor about for the reason
of a "clear & present danger POTUS".

IT DOES SAY it's a function of congress and can be exercised because of
"high crimes & misdemeanors", libtard........

You should try reading it sometime before making a horses ass of yourself
again.

Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
No such danger EVER existed, nor any credible evidence
of ANY wrongdoing was EVER discovered (except in the
dreams and/or hopes of the political party Clinton was
kicking)

[P***@SillyWalk.com]

On Sun, 17 May 2009 05:48:06 -0700, "MioMyo"

Post by MioMyo

Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
On Sat, 16 May 2009 12:32:49 -0700, "MioMyo"

Post by MioMyo

Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
But spending $150 million to smear clinton in a dozen
or so sham "investigations" was okay with you?

Impeachment is not a function of congress?

Impeachment is the function of a political party to
PROTECT America from a "clear and present danger"
involving POTUS--It's a POLITICAL process---not a legal
process.

Not according to the Constitution- It says NOTHING with regard to
impeachment being a function of a political party nor about for the reason
of a "clear & present danger POTUS".

THere is NO provision in the Impeachment clause that
mentions punishment---other than "removal"---IF the
Accusation (impeachment is nothing more than an
accusation by a political party).

THe Gingrich congress had NO provable, credible reasons
to impeach Clinton which was clear at the time and
proven after the senate wouldn't even agree on the
articles and couldn't get even half of the senators to
accept.

Post by MioMyo
IT DOES SAY it's a function of congress and can be exercised because of
"high crimes & misdemeanors", libtard........

Oral sex is not a "high crime" you moron

The entire "impeachment referral" was THEORETICAL, and
when written by Starr, suggested that "an
investigation" be opened (by the HJC) to substantiate
the THEORIES Starr raised.

No such investigation ever happened. No article was
ever substantiated by a first hand witness to an
allegation of an "impeachable offense", no testimony,
no document, no conversation---nothing ever backed the
accusations---until finally the Senate refused to even
consider them.

Post by MioMyo
You should try reading it sometime before making a horses ass of yourself
again.

YOu cannot name any "crime" ALLEGED to have been
committed by Clinton that could be backed by facts or
evidence that qualified either in a legal sense or a
political one.

Impeachment is an ACCUSATION

By itself, it's nothing.

[MioMyo]

Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
On Sun, 17 May 2009 05:48:06 -0700, "MioMyo"

Post by MioMyo

Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
On Sat, 16 May 2009 12:32:49 -0700, "MioMyo"

Post by MioMyo

Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
But spending $150 million to smear clinton in a dozen
or so sham "investigations" was okay with you?

Impeachment is not a function of congress?

Impeachment is the function of a political party to
PROTECT America from a "clear and present danger"
involving POTUS--It's a POLITICAL process---not a legal
process.

Not according to the Constitution- It says NOTHING with regard to
impeachment being a function of a political party nor about for the reason
of a "clear & present danger POTUS".

THere is NO provision in the Impeachment clause that
mentions punishment---other than "removal"---IF the
Accusation (impeachment is nothing more than an
accusation by a political party).
THe Gingrich congress had NO provable, credible reasons
to impeach Clinton which was clear at the time and
proven after the senate wouldn't even agree on the
articles and couldn't get even half of the senators to
accept.

Is that suppose to be your argument proclaiming the Constitution is Wrong
while you're Right?

Post by P***@SillyWalk.com

Post by MioMyo
IT DOES SAY it's a function of congress and can be exercised because of
"high crimes & misdemeanors", libtard........

Oral sex is not a "high crime" you moron
The entire "impeachment referral" was THEORETICAL, and
when written by Starr, suggested that "an
investigation" be opened (by the HJC) to substantiate
the THEORIES Starr raised.
No such investigation ever happened. No article was
ever substantiated by a first hand witness to an
allegation of an "impeachable offense", no testimony,
no document, no conversation---nothing ever backed the
accusations---until finally the Senate refused to even
consider them.

Post by MioMyo
You should try reading it sometime before making a horses ass of yourself
again.

YOu cannot name any "crime" ALLEGED to have been
committed by Clinton that could be backed by facts or
evidence that qualified either in a legal sense or a
political one.
Impeachment is an ACCUSATION
By itself, it's nothing.

Please continue pitifully debating the impeachment of willy, the
ex-liar-n-chief which is now more than a decade old.

It gives me a warm & fuzzy feeling all over.......

[P***@SillyWalk.com]

On Sat, 16 May 2009 04:59:37 -0700, "MioMyo"

Post by MioMyo
The U.S. Attorney's Office in Massachusetts directed employees earlierthis
month not to log onto the Drudge Report website with government-issued
computers due to potential viruses on the site.

The government shouldn't be telling employee's what
comedy they watch

[MioMyo]

Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
On Sat, 16 May 2009 04:59:37 -0700, "MioMyo"

Post by MioMyo
The U.S. Attorney's Office in Massachusetts directed employees earlierthis
month not to log onto the Drudge Report website with government-issued
computers due to potential viruses on the site.

The government shouldn't be telling employee's what
comedy they watch

Government computer on government time..... You're a brain dead imbecile.

[P***@SillyWalk.com]

On Sat, 16 May 2009 06:21:22 -0700, "MioMyo"

Post by MioMyo

Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
On Sat, 16 May 2009 04:59:37 -0700, "MioMyo"

Post by MioMyo
The U.S. Attorney's Office in Massachusetts directed employees earlierthis
month not to log onto the Drudge Report website with government-issued
computers due to potential viruses on the site.

The government shouldn't be telling employee's what
comedy they watch

Government computer on government time..... You're a brain dead imbecile.

But then again I'm not watching Drudge, you stupid
fuckwit.

[MioMyo]

Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
On Sat, 16 May 2009 06:21:22 -0700, "MioMyo"

Post by MioMyo

Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
On Sat, 16 May 2009 04:59:37 -0700, "MioMyo"

Post by MioMyo
The U.S. Attorney's Office in Massachusetts directed employees earlierthis
month not to log onto the Drudge Report website with government-issued
computers due to potential viruses on the site.

The government shouldn't be telling employee's what
comedy they watch

Government computer on government time..... You're a brain dead imbecile.

But then again I'm not watching Drudge, you stupid
fuckwit.

I accept your admission in making an imbecilic non-sequitur comment in your
last post......

[P***@SillyWalk.com]

On Sat, 16 May 2009 12:35:07 -0700, "MioMyo"

Post by MioMyo

Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
But then again I'm not watching Drudge, you stupid
fuckwit.

I accept your admission in making an imbecilic non-sequitur comment in your
last post......

It certainly DOES "follow" that anyone stupid enough to
actually admit reading, or listening to Drudge can't be
considered credible.

[MioMyo]

Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
On Sat, 16 May 2009 12:35:07 -0700, "MioMyo"

Post by MioMyo

Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
But then again I'm not watching Drudge, you stupid
fuckwit.

I accept your admission in making an imbecilic non-sequitur comment in your
last post......

It certainly DOES "follow" that anyone stupid enough to
actually admit reading, or listening to Drudge can't be
considered credible.

But your opinion hating Drudge has nothing to do with the subject at hand.
The subject is regarding the misuse of government computers by employees on
government time.

[P***@SillyWalk.com]

On Sun, 17 May 2009 05:52:50 -0700, "MioMyo"

Post by MioMyo

Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
On Sat, 16 May 2009 12:35:07 -0700, "MioMyo"

Post by MioMyo

Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
But then again I'm not watching Drudge, you stupid
fuckwit.

I accept your admission in making an imbecilic non-sequitur comment in your
last post......

It certainly DOES "follow" that anyone stupid enough to
actually admit reading, or listening to Drudge can't be
considered credible.

But your opinion hating Drudge has nothing to do with the subject at hand.

The subject in your hand is rightwing ignorance and
stupidity---PLUS the American view of how bad
conservatives served us in the last 30 years.

Reagan was a liar and perjurer, Gingrich's congress was
one of the worst nightmares we had in 2 centuries, and
Bush was the worst American President in history.

Drudge and Limpalls are the face of Republicanism

[MioMyo]

Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
On Sun, 17 May 2009 05:52:50 -0700, "MioMyo"

Post by MioMyo

Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
On Sat, 16 May 2009 12:35:07 -0700, "MioMyo"

Post by MioMyo

Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
But then again I'm not watching Drudge, you stupid
fuckwit.

I accept your admission in making an imbecilic non-sequitur comment in your
last post......

It certainly DOES "follow" that anyone stupid enough to
actually admit reading, or listening to Drudge can't be
considered credible.

But your opinion hating Drudge has nothing to do with the subject at hand.

The subject in your hand is rightwing ignorance and
stupidity---PLUS the American view of how bad
conservatives served us in the last 30 years.

No, that would be the crack pipe subject talking to you again, libtard......

Post by P***@SillyWalk.com
Reagan was a liar and perjurer, Gingrich's congress was
one of the worst nightmares we had in 2 centuries, and
Bush was the worst American President in history.
Drudge and Limpalls are the face of Republicanism

Go smoke another bowl tard, even though it's not quite noon yet.....