Discussion:
Nancy Pelosi - a Lying Bitch and Hypocrite to Boot......
(too old to reply)
MioMyo
2009-04-24 11:39:18 UTC
Permalink
Indeed anyone who believes the Imperial Princess Pelosi and, for that
matter, a handful of democrat leaders in congress didn't know about the
enhanced interrogation techniques now being charaded as "torture," well they
are either brain dead, liars or hypocrites themselves. Yes this bitch knew.
Just look at the plastic, grim mish, phony smile always plaster on that mug
of hers......

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/capitol-briefing/2009/04/pelosi_denies_knowing_interrog.html?hpid=topnews

Pelosi Denies Knowing Interrogation Techniques Were Used
By Paul Kane

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) today said congressional leaders were
never briefed about the use of an enhanced interrogation practice, rejecting
GOP claims that leadership was aware of the controversial tactics by late
2002.

Pelosi said the select few lawmakers who were briefed about handling of
detainees from the war on terror, were then forbidden from discussing what
they had learned with their colleagues. This produced an environment in
which the top lawmakers were told of the existence of legal opinions
supporting the rationale for waterboarding detainees, but never told that it
was actually being used, according to Pelosi.

"Flat out, they never briefed us that this was happening," she said.

In late 2002, Pelosi was the ranking member of the House intelligence
committee, while Porter Goss (R-Fla.) was chairman, when they first learned
of the general nature of the interrogation techniques that were under
consideration by the CIA's top officials. They were part of the so-called
"Gang of Four" briefings given to the top members of the intelligence panels
in the House and Senate. Pelosi continued receiving highly classified
briefings when she became Democratic leader in 2003, as is custom to brief
the top Democrat and Republican in each of the two chambers.

Republicans have repeatedly cited these briefings to reject calls from
Pelosi and many congressional Democrats to create a "truth commission" to
investigate alleged abuses in interrogations. Those calls grew louder after
last week's release of the legal memos that the Bush administration used,
from the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel, to explain what was
allowed and what would break international anti-torture laws.

"All of this information was downloaded to congressional leaders of both
parties with no objections being raised," House Minority Leader John Boehner
(R-Ohio) told reporters today, specifically citing Pelosi as someone who
received the briefings. "Not a word was raised at the time, not one word."

Rep. Peter Hoekstra (R-Mich), the ranking member of the House intelligence
panel, argued the same point in an op-ed in today's Wall Street Journal.

Pelosi denied these claims. "We were not -- I repeat -- were not told that
waterboarding or any of these other enhanced interrogation methods were
used. What they did tell us is that they had . . . the Office of Legal
Counsel opinions [and] that they could be used, but not that they would,"
she said.

She said some officials, such as Goss, who went on to become CIA director,
argued the lawmakers should have known the waterboarding would be used
because they were told it was a legal practice. But she said they had no way
of knowing that for certain, and they were then forbidden from talking about
what they had learned so they could not work to outlaw the practice.

She summed up the briefings this way: "This is what they're doing. That's
all they do. They don't come in to consult. They come in to notify. They
come in to notify. And you can't -- you can't change what they're doing
unless you can act as a committee or as a class. You can't change what
they're doing."
M***@silent.com
2009-04-24 12:42:10 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 04:39:18 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
Pelosi Denies Knowing Interrogation Techniques Were Used
By Paul Kane
Yet when Bush was PROVEN to have lied about Coke Use,
Desertion, WMD---you found nothing amiss.

Stupid fuck
CB
2009-04-24 13:45:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by M***@silent.com
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 04:39:18 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
Pelosi Denies Knowing Interrogation Techniques Were Used
By Paul Kane
Yet when Bush was PROVEN to have lied about Coke Use,
Desertion, WMD---you found nothing amiss.
Stupid fuck
Hey Nigger Gary, yeah you Gary.

The subject is on Pelosi and her lies
geno4321
2009-04-24 14:42:24 UTC
Permalink
They are all liars. So what is the point?
Post by CB
Post by M***@silent.com
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 04:39:18 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
Pelosi Denies Knowing Interrogation Techniques Were Used
By Paul Kane
Yet when Bush was PROVEN to have lied about Coke Use,
Desertion, WMD---you found nothing amiss.
Stupid fuck
Hey Nigger Gary, yeah you Gary.
The subject is on Pelosi and her lies
M***@silent.com
2009-04-24 19:27:29 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:42:24 -0400, "geno4321"
Post by geno4321
They are all liars. So what is the point?
Post by CB
Post by M***@silent.com
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 04:39:18 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
Pelosi Denies Knowing Interrogation Techniques Were Used
By Paul Kane
Yet when Bush was PROVEN to have lied about Coke Use,
Desertion, WMD---you found nothing amiss.
Stupid fuck
Hey Nigger Gary, yeah you Gary.
The subject is on Pelosi and her lies
The issue is "denial" and whether or not Pelosi "lied"

Bush did, She DIdn't
MioMyo
2009-04-25 01:27:50 UTC
Permalink
Indeed anyone who believes the Imperial Princess Pelosi and, for that
matter, a handful of democrat leaders in congress didn't know about the
enhanced interrogation techniques now being charaded as "torture," well they
are either brain dead, liars or hypocrites themselves. Yes this bitch knew.
Just look at the plastic, grim mish, phony smile always plaster on that mug
of hers......

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/capitol-briefing/2009/04/pelosi_denies_knowing_interrog.html?hpid=topnews

Pelosi Denies Knowing Interrogation Techniques Were Used
By Paul Kane

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) today said congressional leaders were
never briefed about the use of an enhanced interrogation practice, rejecting
GOP claims that leadership was aware of the controversial tactics by late
2002.

Pelosi said the select few lawmakers who were briefed about handling of
detainees from the war on terror, were then forbidden from discussing what
they had learned with their colleagues. This produced an environment in
which the top lawmakers were told of the existence of legal opinions
supporting the rationale for waterboarding detainees, but never told that it
was actually being used, according to Pelosi.

"Flat out, they never briefed us that this was happening," she said.

In late 2002, Pelosi was the ranking member of the House intelligence
committee, while Porter Goss (R-Fla.) was chairman, when they first learned
of the general nature of the interrogation techniques that were under
consideration by the CIA's top officials. They were part of the so-called
"Gang of Four" briefings given to the top members of the intelligence panels
in the House and Senate. Pelosi continued receiving highly classified
briefings when she became Democratic leader in 2003, as is custom to brief
the top Democrat and Republican in each of the two chambers.

Republicans have repeatedly cited these briefings to reject calls from
Pelosi and many congressional Democrats to create a "truth commission" to
investigate alleged abuses in interrogations. Those calls grew louder after
last week's release of the legal memos that the Bush administration used,
from the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel, to explain what was
allowed and what would break international anti-torture laws.

"All of this information was downloaded to congressional leaders of both
parties with no objections being raised," House Minority Leader John Boehner
(R-Ohio) told reporters today, specifically citing Pelosi as someone who
received the briefings. "Not a word was raised at the time, not one word."

Rep. Peter Hoekstra (R-Mich), the ranking member of the House intelligence
panel, argued the same point in an op-ed in today's Wall Street Journal.

Pelosi denied these claims. "We were not -- I repeat -- were not told that
waterboarding or any of these other enhanced interrogation methods were
used. What they did tell us is that they had . . . the Office of Legal
Counsel opinions [and] that they could be used, but not that they would,"
she said.

She said some officials, such as Goss, who went on to become CIA director,
argued the lawmakers should have known the waterboarding would be used
because they were told it was a legal practice. But she said they had no way
of knowing that for certain, and they were then forbidden from talking about
what they had learned so they could not work to outlaw the practice.

She summed up the briefings this way: "This is what they're doing. That's
all they do. They don't come in to consult. They come in to notify. They
come in to notify. And you can't -- you can't change what they're doing
unless you can act as a committee or as a class. You can't change what
they're doing."
**************************************
Post by M***@silent.com
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:42:24 -0400, "geno4321"
Post by geno4321
They are all liars. So what is the point?
Post by CB
Post by M***@silent.com
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 04:39:18 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
Pelosi Denies Knowing Interrogation Techniques Were Used
By Paul Kane
Yet when Bush was PROVEN to have lied about Coke Use,
Desertion, WMD---you found nothing amiss.
Stupid fuck
Hey Nigger Gary, yeah you Gary.
The subject is on Pelosi and her lies
The issue is "denial" and whether or not Pelosi "lied"
The facts prove she lied.
Post by M***@silent.com
Bush did, She DIdn't
There's no proof that Bush lied........
Garrison St.
2009-04-25 04:23:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by MioMyo
Indeed anyone who believes the Imperial Princess Pelosi
Yet you ran righty out and voted for Mafia Queen John McDicksucker.
That makes you GAY!
M***@silent.com
2009-04-25 13:30:40 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 18:27:50 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
Indeed anyone who believes the Imperial Princess Pelosi and, for that
matter, a handful of democrat leaders in congress didn't know about the
enhanced interrogation techniques now being charaded as "torture," well they
are either brain dead, liars or hypocrites themselves. Yes this bitch knew.
Just look at the plastic, grim mish, phony smile always plaster on that mug
of hers......
Yawn

And you claimed Clinton committed "Crimes"----after
spending $140 Million in Tax payer money, $7 million in
Scaife money never finding a single thing

You also went along with Bush AFTER we found out he
lied to us by using OLD discredited intel----

Now you're claiming you have some remarkable recent
acquired way of discerning whether a political opponent
(who whipped you in several elections) is "lying"

You get more stupid each time you post.
MioMyo
2009-04-25 14:15:38 UTC
Permalink
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/capitol-briefing/2009/04/pelosi_denies_knowing_interrog.html?hpid=topnews

Pelosi Denies Knowing Interrogation Techniques Were Used
By Paul Kane

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) today said congressional leaders were
never briefed about the use of an enhanced interrogation practice, rejecting
GOP claims that leadership was aware of the controversial tactics by late
2002.

Pelosi said the select few lawmakers who were briefed about handling of
detainees from the war on terror, were then forbidden from discussing what
they had learned with their colleagues. This produced an environment in
which the top lawmakers were told of the existence of legal opinions
supporting the rationale for waterboarding detainees, but never told that it
was actually being used, according to Pelosi.

"Flat out, they never briefed us that this was happening," she said.

In late 2002, Pelosi was the ranking member of the House intelligence
committee, while Porter Goss (R-Fla.) was chairman, when they first learned
of the general nature of the interrogation techniques that were under
consideration by the CIA's top officials. They were part of the so-called
"Gang of Four" briefings given to the top members of the intelligence panels
in the House and Senate. Pelosi continued receiving highly classified
briefings when she became Democratic leader in 2003, as is custom to brief
the top Democrat and Republican in each of the two chambers.

Republicans have repeatedly cited these briefings to reject calls from
Pelosi and many congressional Democrats to create a "truth commission" to
investigate alleged abuses in interrogations. Those calls grew louder after
last week's release of the legal memos that the Bush administration used,
from the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel, to explain what was
allowed and what would break international anti-torture laws.

"All of this information was downloaded to congressional leaders of both
parties with no objections being raised," House Minority Leader John Boehner
(R-Ohio) told reporters today, specifically citing Pelosi as someone who
received the briefings. "Not a word was raised at the time, not one word."

Rep. Peter Hoekstra (R-Mich), the ranking member of the House intelligence
panel, argued the same point in an op-ed in today's Wall Street Journal.

Pelosi denied these claims. "We were not -- I repeat -- were not told that
waterboarding or any of these other enhanced interrogation methods were
used. What they did tell us is that they had . . . the Office of Legal
Counsel opinions [and] that they could be used, but not that they would,"
she said.

She said some officials, such as Goss, who went on to become CIA director,
argued the lawmakers should have known the waterboarding would be used
because they were told it was a legal practice. But she said they had no way
of knowing that for certain, and they were then forbidden from talking about
what they had learned so they could not work to outlaw the practice.

She summed up the briefings this way: "This is what they're doing. That's
all they do. They don't come in to consult. They come in to notify. They
come in to notify. And you can't -- you can't change what they're doing
unless you can act as a committee or as a class. You can't change what
they're doing."
Post by M***@silent.com
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 18:27:50 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
Indeed anyone who believes the Imperial Princess Pelosi and, for that
matter, a handful of democrat leaders in congress didn't know about the
enhanced interrogation techniques now being charaded as "torture," well they
are either brain dead, liars or hypocrites themselves. Yes this bitch knew.
Just look at the plastic, grim mish, phony smile always plaster on that mug
of hers......
Yawn
And you claimed Clinton committed "Crimes"----after
spending $140 Million in Tax payer money, $7 million in
Scaife money never finding a single thing
Years long ago past of inconvenient FACTS for which you continue to choke on
lib....

How Delightful of you to remind me of how much PAIN I constantly instill in
you..............
Post by M***@silent.com
You also went along with Bush AFTER we found out he
lied to us by using OLD discredited intel----
Discredited only to you because you cannot accept the Painful
TRUTH..........
Post by M***@silent.com
Now you're claiming you have some remarkable recent
acquired way of discerning whether a political opponent
(who whipped you in several elections) is "lying"
I'm merely CITING CREDIBLE FACTS, lib. You know the FACTS CITED in the
Washington Post article that makes you reek with FEAR & DESPERATION which is
why you keep deleting its link. However, for your own PAINFUL good, I've
reposted it at no charge- details above.
Post by M***@silent.com
You get more stupid each time you post.
You keep lying and deleting the PAINFUL TRUTH each time you post, lib.
M***@silent.com
2009-04-25 21:15:36 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 07:15:38 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
Pelosi Denies Knowing Interrogation Techniques Were Used
Too true.

Thanks for mentioning it.
MioMyo
2009-04-26 00:10:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by M***@silent.com
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 07:15:38 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
Pelosi Denies Knowing Interrogation Techniques Were Used
Too true.
Thanks for mentioning it.
But her statement is in conflict with the official congressional record
proving her a liar & hypocrite, so I'm delighted to have mentioned
it...........
M***@silent.com
2009-04-26 13:02:18 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:10:31 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
Post by M***@silent.com
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 07:15:38 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
Pelosi Denies Knowing Interrogation Techniques Were Used
Too true.
Thanks for mentioning it.
But her statement is in conflict with the official congressional record
ANd the congressional record was controlled by---?
MioMyo
2009-04-26 13:43:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by M***@silent.com
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:10:31 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
Post by M***@silent.com
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 07:15:38 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
Pelosi Denies Knowing Interrogation Techniques Were Used
Too true.
Thanks for mentioning it.
But her statement is in conflict with the official congressional record
ANd the congressional record was controlled by---?
The congressional record is documented historical fact of past events,
libtard.......

But the real question is, how much more desperate could you get trying to
revise history, lie and then get away with it?
M***@silent.com
2009-04-26 18:57:51 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 06:43:21 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
The congressional record is documented historical fact of past events,
libtard.......
But the real question is, how much more desperate could you get trying to
revise history, lie and then get away with it?
You haven't presented one shred of evidence that
Pelosi, was told SPECIFICS of any of the immoral and
illegal activities being done--

Those not "in" with the Bush adminstration were given
redacted and non-specific information
MioMyo
2009-04-26 22:05:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by M***@silent.com
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 06:43:21 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
The congressional record is documented historical fact of past events,
libtard.......
But the real question is, how much more desperate could you get trying to
revise history, lie and then get away with it?
You haven't presented one shred of evidence that
Pelosi, was told SPECIFICS of any of the immoral and
illegal activities being done--
No, it's that you haven't been paying attention because you have your head
buried deep up inside your ass.
Post by M***@silent.com
Those not "in" with the Bush adminstration were given
redacted and non-specific information
Liar, try reading up on the subject. I provided but one link on the matter.
There are many more and they are corroborate the fact the imperial princess
pelosi was briefed. It's just that she is the only one who was in the
meeting that is now denying acknowledging the substance of those meetings.

She's a liar and you're a sycophant. Deal with that reality, libtard.
geno4321
2009-04-25 15:20:35 UTC
Permalink
Your just comparing one ignorant political hack by white washing anoher
political hack.
Post by M***@silent.com
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 18:27:50 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
Indeed anyone who believes the Imperial Princess Pelosi and, for that
matter, a handful of democrat leaders in congress didn't know about the
enhanced interrogation techniques now being charaded as "torture," well they
are either brain dead, liars or hypocrites themselves. Yes this bitch knew.
Just look at the plastic, grim mish, phony smile always plaster on that mug
of hers......
Yawn
And you claimed Clinton committed "Crimes"----after
spending $140 Million in Tax payer money, $7 million in
Scaife money never finding a single thing
You also went along with Bush AFTER we found out he
lied to us by using OLD discredited intel----
Now you're claiming you have some remarkable recent
acquired way of discerning whether a political opponent
(who whipped you in several elections) is "lying"
You get more stupid each time you post.
M***@silent.com
2009-04-25 21:16:29 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 11:20:35 -0400, "geno4321"
Post by geno4321
Your just comparing one ignorant political hack by white washing anoher
political hack.
However, "my" Political hack doesn't believe in
funneling more and more money to the wealth class.
geno4321
2009-04-25 15:17:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by M***@silent.com
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:42:24 -0400, "geno4321"
Post by geno4321
They are all liars. So what is the point?
Post by CB
Post by M***@silent.com
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 04:39:18 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
Pelosi Denies Knowing Interrogation Techniques Were Used
By Paul Kane
Yet when Bush was PROVEN to have lied about Coke Use,
Desertion, WMD---you found nothing amiss.
Stupid fuck
Hey Nigger Gary, yeah you Gary.
The subject is on Pelosi and her lies
The issue is "denial" and whether or not Pelosi "lied"
When it comes to hard facts both parties are in denial.
And Clinton is trying to out do Pelosi.
Post by M***@silent.com
Bush did, She DIdn't
Frank Pittel
2009-04-25 16:48:15 UTC
Permalink
In alt.politics.usa.republican Mike-***@silent.com wrote:
: On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:42:24 -0400, "geno4321"
: <***@fuse.net> wrote:

: >They are all liars. So what is the point?
: >
: >"CB" <***@PrayForMe.com> wrote in message
: >news:49f1c27d$0$11853$***@unlimited.newshosting.com...
: >>
: >> <Mike-***@silent.com> wrote in message
: >> news:***@4ax.com...
: >>> On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 04:39:18 -0700, "MioMyo"
: >>> <***@Somewhere.com> wrote:
: >>>
: >>>>Pelosi Denies Knowing Interrogation Techniques Were Used
: >>>>By Paul Kane
: >>>
: >>> Yet when Bush was PROVEN to have lied about Coke Use,
: >>> Desertion, WMD---you found nothing amiss.
: >>>
: >>> Stupid fuck
: >>>
: >>
: >> Hey Nigger Gary, yeah you Gary.
: >>
: >> The subject is on Pelosi and her lies

: The issue is "denial" and whether or not Pelosi "lied"

: Bush did, She DIdn't

Prove it!!
--
-------------------
Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
M***@silent.com
2009-04-25 21:16:57 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 11:48:15 -0500, Frank Pittel
Post by Frank Pittel
: Bush did, She DIdn't
Prove it!!
--
Oh, sorry---did you find those WMD and not tell us?
Frank Pittel
2009-04-26 18:47:07 UTC
Permalink
In alt.politics.usa.republican Mike-***@silent.com wrote:
: On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 11:48:15 -0500, Frank Pittel
: <***@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote:

: >: Bush did, She DIdn't
: >
: >Prove it!!
: >--

: Oh, sorry---did you find those WMD and not tell us?

Still no proof I see.
--
-------------------
Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
M***@silent.com
2009-04-26 18:58:18 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:47:07 -0500, Frank Pittel
Post by Frank Pittel
: Oh, sorry---did you find those WMD and not tell us?
Still no proof I see.
No, I assume you're still looking for them

RIght FrankieLoon?
Frank Pittel
2009-04-27 00:58:55 UTC
Permalink
In alt.politics.usa.republican Mike-***@silent.com wrote:
: On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:47:07 -0500, Frank Pittel
: <***@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote:

: >: Oh, sorry---did you find those WMD and not tell us?
: >
: >Still no proof I see.

: No, I assume you're still looking for them

Can't find the proof so you desperately try to change the subject.
Where's the credible proof that Bush lied??
--
-------------------
Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
M***@silent.com
2009-04-27 15:13:40 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 19:58:55 -0500, Frank Pittel
Post by Frank Pittel
: On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:47:07 -0500, Frank Pittel
: >: Oh, sorry---did you find those WMD and not tell us?
: >
: >Still no proof I see.
: No, I assume you're still looking for them
Can't find the proof so you desperately try to change the subject.
Where's the credible proof that Bush lied??
Other than the public record of none being found

Other than the public record of ALL his excuses he gave
to congress NOT being valid by Feb. 2003?

What fucking "other" proof do you need?
Frank Pittel
2009-04-27 16:35:22 UTC
Permalink
In alt.politics.usa.republican Mike-***@silent.com wrote:
: On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 19:58:55 -0500, Frank Pittel
: <***@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote:

: >In alt.politics.usa.republican Mike-***@silent.com wrote:
: >: On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:47:07 -0500, Frank Pittel
: >: <***@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote:
: >
: >: >: Oh, sorry---did you find those WMD and not tell us?
: >: >
: >: >Still no proof I see.
: >
: >: No, I assume you're still looking for them
: >
: >Can't find the proof so you desperately try to change the subject.
: >Where's the credible proof that Bush lied??

: Other than the public record of none being found

: Other than the public record of ALL his excuses he gave
: to congress NOT being valid by Feb. 2003?

: What fucking "other" proof do you need?

Credible proof that he lied would be nice. Before you blabber
on again try looking up the word lie in the dictionary. Keep the
definition of the word lie in mind when replying.
--
-------------------
Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
M***@silent.com
2009-04-28 01:55:11 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:35:22 -0500, Frank Pittel
Post by Frank Pittel
: >Can't find the proof so you desperately try to change the subject.
: >Where's the credible proof that Bush lied??
: Other than the public record of none being found
: Other than the public record of ALL his excuses he gave
: to congress NOT being valid by Feb. 2003?
: What fucking "other" proof do you need?
Credible proof that he lied would be nice
Were there "Tons of WMD" in Iraq? If not, then that was
a fucking LIE

Were there "aluminum tubes" used for Nuclear weapons?
If not that was a LIE

Were there meetings and collusion between Saddam and Al
Queda? If not, then it was a LIE

Were there operating mobil labs churning out CB warfare
agents? If Not, then it was a LIE

Did Saddam attempt to buy Yellow cake from Niger? If
not, then it was a LIE

ALL of the above were NOT TRUE

If something is claimed---(as bush did in telling that
to congress) and NOTHING was true---Isn't that Lying?

There was no "slam dunk" in ANY of the stated claims
made to congress

Worst of all was Bush KNEW none of it was true by
February 2003--weeks before the attack.

Bush cannot provide any records of his NG duty
completion---other than a note saying he did

Bush cannot provide any documentation of his last
required Flight Physical he was ordered to take---just
before he stopped going to meetings

Bush cannot explain why he could pass a drug test AFTER
his daddy became VP, but not BEFORE.

Bush has never explained how he was a "uniter, not a
divider" when the nation got more polarized during his
regime.
Frank Pittel
2009-04-28 03:14:39 UTC
Permalink
In alt.politics.usa.republican Mike-***@silent.com wrote:
: On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:35:22 -0500, Frank Pittel
: <***@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote:

: >: >Can't find the proof so you desperately try to change the subject.
: >: >Where's the credible proof that Bush lied??
: >
: >: Other than the public record of none being found
: >
: >: Other than the public record of ALL his excuses he gave
: >: to congress NOT being valid by Feb. 2003?
: >
: >: What fucking "other" proof do you need?
: >
: >Credible proof that he lied would be nice

: Were there "Tons of WMD" in Iraq? If not, then that was
: a fucking LIE

: Were there "aluminum tubes" used for Nuclear weapons?
: If not that was a LIE

: Were there meetings and collusion between Saddam and Al
: Queda? If not, then it was a LIE

: Were there operating mobil labs churning out CB warfare
: agents? If Not, then it was a LIE

: Did Saddam attempt to buy Yellow cake from Niger? If
: not, then it was a LIE

: ALL of the above were NOT TRUE

Now all you have to do is prove that the above were lies.
Before you blabber on again try looking up the meaning of the
word lie.
--
-------------------
Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
RichTravsky
2009-04-26 04:58:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by CB
Post by M***@silent.com
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 04:39:18 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
Pelosi Denies Knowing Interrogation Techniques Were Used
By Paul Kane
Yet when Bush was PROVEN to have lied about Coke Use,
Desertion, WMD---you found nothing amiss.
Stupid fuck
Hey Nigger Gary, yeah you Gary.
The subject is on Pelosi and her lies
MioMyo
2009-04-25 01:24:10 UTC
Permalink
Indeed anyone who believes the Imperial Princess Pelosi and, for that
matter, a handful of democrat leaders in congress didn't know about the
enhanced interrogation techniques now being charaded as "torture," well they
are either brain dead, liars or hypocrites themselves. Yes this bitch knew.
Just look at the plastic, grim mish, phony smile always plaster on that mug
of hers......

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/capitol-briefing/2009/04/pelosi_denies_knowing_interrog.html?hpid=topnews

Pelosi Denies Knowing Interrogation Techniques Were Used
By Paul Kane

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) today said congressional leaders were
never briefed about the use of an enhanced interrogation practice, rejecting
GOP claims that leadership was aware of the controversial tactics by late
2002.
Pelosi said the select few lawmakers who were briefed about handling of
detainees from the war on terror, were then forbidden from discussing what
they had learned with their colleagues. This produced an environment in
which the top lawmakers were told of the existence of legal opinions
supporting the rationale for waterboarding detainees, but never told that it
was actually being used, according to Pelosi.

"Flat out, they never briefed us that this was happening," she said.

In late 2002, Pelosi was the ranking member of the House intelligence
committee, while Porter Goss (R-Fla.) was chairman, when they first learned
of the general nature of the interrogation techniques that were under
consideration by the CIA's top officials. They were part of the so-called
"Gang of Four" briefings given to the top members of the intelligence panels
in the House and Senate. Pelosi continued receiving highly classified
briefings when she became Democratic leader in 2003, as is custom to brief
the top Democrat and Republican in each of the two chambers.

Republicans have repeatedly cited these briefings to reject calls from
Pelosi and many congressional Democrats to create a "truth commission" to
investigate alleged abuses in interrogations. Those calls grew louder after
last week's release of the legal memos that the Bush administration used,
from the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel, to explain what was
allowed and what would break international anti-torture laws.

"All of this information was downloaded to congressional leaders of both
parties with no objections being raised," House Minority Leader John Boehner
(R-Ohio) told reporters today, specifically citing Pelosi as someone who
received the briefings. "Not a word was raised at the time, not one word."

Rep. Peter Hoekstra (R-Mich), the ranking member of the House intelligence
panel, argued the same point in an op-ed in today's Wall Street Journal.

Pelosi denied these claims. "We were not -- I repeat -- were not told that
waterboarding or any of these other enhanced interrogation methods were
used. What they did tell us is that they had . . . the Office of Legal
Counsel opinions [and] that they could be used, but not that they would,"
she said.

She said some officials, such as Goss, who went on to become CIA director,
argued the lawmakers should have known the waterboarding would be used
because they were told it was a legal practice. But she said they had no way
of knowing that for certain, and they were then forbidden from talking about
what they had learned so they could not work to outlaw the practice.

She summed up the briefings this way: "This is what they're doing. That's
all they do. They don't come in to consult. They come in to notify. They
come in to notify. And you can't -- you can't change what they're doing
unless you can act as a committee or as a class. You can't change what
they're doing."
*****************************
Post by M***@silent.com
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 04:39:18 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
Pelosi Denies Knowing Interrogation Techniques Were Used
By Paul Kane
Yet when Bush was PROVEN to have lied about Coke Use,
Desertion, WMD---you found nothing amiss.
When did that happen, libtard?
Post by M***@silent.com
Stupid fuck
Indeed you are....................
Garrison St.
2009-04-25 04:24:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by MioMyo
Indeed anyone who believes the Imperial Princess Pelosi and, for that
matter, a handful of democrat leaders in congress didn't know about the
enhanced interrogation techniques now being charaded as "torture," well
they are either brain dead, liars or hypocrites themselves. Yes this
bitch knew. Just look at the plastic, grim mish, phony smile always
plaster on that mug of hers......
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/capitol-briefing/2009/04/pelosi_denies_knowing_interrog.html?hpid=topnews
Pelosi Denies Knowing Interrogation Techniques Were Used
By Paul Kane
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) today said congressional leaders were
never briefed about the use of an enhanced interrogation practice,
rejecting GOP claims that leadership was aware of the controversial
tactics by late 2002.
Pelosi said the select few lawmakers who were briefed about handling of
detainees from the war on terror, were then forbidden from discussing what
they had learned with their colleagues. This produced an environment in
which the top lawmakers were told of the existence of legal opinions
supporting the rationale for waterboarding detainees, but never told that
it was actually being used, according to Pelosi.
"Flat out, they never briefed us that this was happening," she said.
In late 2002, Pelosi was the ranking member of the House intelligence
committee, while Porter Goss (R-Fla.) was chairman, when they first
learned of the general nature of the interrogation techniques that were
under consideration by the CIA's top officials. They were part of the
so-called "Gang of Four" briefings given to the top members of the
intelligence panels in the House and Senate. Pelosi continued receiving
highly classified briefings when she became Democratic leader in 2003, as
is custom to brief the top Democrat and Republican in each of the two
chambers.
Republicans have repeatedly cited these briefings to reject calls from
Pelosi and many congressional Democrats to create a "truth commission" to
investigate alleged abuses in interrogations. Those calls grew louder
after last week's release of the legal memos that the Bush administration
used, from the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel, to explain
what was allowed and what would break international anti-torture laws.
"All of this information was downloaded to congressional leaders of both
parties with no objections being raised," House Minority Leader John
Boehner (R-Ohio) told reporters today, specifically citing Pelosi as
someone who received the briefings. "Not a word was raised at the time,
not one word."
Rep. Peter Hoekstra (R-Mich), the ranking member of the House intelligence
panel, argued the same point in an op-ed in today's Wall Street Journal.
Pelosi denied these claims. "We were not -- I repeat -- were not told that
waterboarding or any of these other enhanced interrogation methods were
used. What they did tell us is that they had . . . the Office of Legal
Counsel opinions [and] that they could be used, but not that they would,"
she said.
She said some officials, such as Goss, who went on to become CIA director,
argued the lawmakers should have known the waterboarding would be used
because they were told it was a legal practice. But she said they had no
way of knowing that for certain, and they were then forbidden from talking
about what they had learned so they could not work to outlaw the practice.
She summed up the briefings this way: "This is what they're doing. That's
all they do. They don't come in to consult. They come in to notify. They
come in to notify. And you can't -- you can't change what they're doing
unless you can act as a committee or as a class. You can't change what
they're doing."
*****************************
Post by M***@silent.com
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 04:39:18 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
Pelosi Denies Knowing Interrogation Techniques Were Used
By Paul Kane
Yet when Bush was PROVEN to have lied about Coke Use,
Desertion, WMD---you found nothing amiss.
When did that happen, libtard?
Post by M***@silent.com
Stupid fuck
Indeed you are....................
Denial is lying.
M***@silent.com
2009-04-25 13:44:07 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 18:24:10 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
"Flat out, they never briefed us that this was happening," she said.
Considering the last 8 years of lying by Bush's
administration----most REAL americans who can think
would tend to believe her---rather than Cheny/Bush
MioMyo
2009-04-25 14:23:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by M***@silent.com
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 18:24:10 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
"Flat out, they never briefed us that this was happening," she said.
Considering the last 8 years of lying by Bush's
administration----most REAL americans who can think
would tend to believe her---rather than Cheny/Bush
Most Clear-Thinking, Intelligent Americans BELIEVE the Official
Congressional Record, which Exposes the Imperial Princess Pelosi as a LYING
BITCH!

Thanks GOD that group excludes you.
Tim Crowley
2009-04-25 15:01:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by MioMyo
Most Clear-Thinking, Intelligent Americans BELIEVE the Official
hint: clear thinking, intellegent Americans do NOT call themselves
MeOhMyOh so they can spam lies while hiding.


hint: face the facts, you are nothing but a Usenet Koook, clear
thinking intelligent Americans laugh at your idiocy.


groups trimmed, Americans also think spammers suck
MioMyo
2009-04-26 00:20:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tim Crowley
Post by MioMyo
Most Clear-Thinking, Intelligent Americans BELIEVE the Official
hint: clear thinking, intellegent Americans do NOT call themselves
MeOhMyOh so they can spam lies while hiding.
No one is hiding coward. That's why I come back kicking your silly ass time
& time again, bitch.
Post by Tim Crowley
hint: face the facts, you are nothing but a Usenet Koook, clear
thinking intelligent Americans laugh at your idiocy.
Because you say so, right bitch. When are you ever going to try to prove
your lame ASSertions, kunt?
Post by Tim Crowley
groups trimmed, Americans also think spammers suck
Groups restored. This is my thread, bitch. Besides by definition of SPAM,
there's none her you moron.

Look and see for yourself, your dumb-f_ck embred. There's nothing commercial
nor are the number pf groups unreasonable about my posting comments to SEVEN
political newsgroups, dumbass.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/spam

: unsolicited usually commercial e-mail sent to a large number of addresses
MioMyo
2009-04-26 02:52:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by MioMyo
No one is hiding coward. That's why I come back kicking your silly ass time
& time again, bitch.
snicker. you're too frightened to use your fucking name. You're
hiding like the little scared child you are.
Your definition of hiding is meaningless, especially here on Usenet. Besides
there's no proof you are who you claim to be. Furthermore, a sound cogent
argument stands on its own merits and that's an ass-kicking, stinging point
you constantly hide from every time I bitch-slap you upside the face with
it.......
Post by MioMyo
Post by Tim Crowley
groups trimmed, Americans also think spammers suck
Groups restored. This is my thread, bitch.
Bttttz, wrong again. You're a racist spammer. All you own is your
hate.
You calling your opponent racist etc. without ever backing this nonsense up
does not count as a legitimate retort and certainly is nothing less than a
response typical of a 6th grade school yard punk and bully.

Thanks for making my point bitch.
MioMyo
2009-04-26 14:00:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by MioMyo
Post by MioMyo
No one is hiding coward. That's why I come back kicking your silly ass time
& time again, bitch.
snicker. you're too frightened to use your fucking name. You're
hiding like the little scared child you are.
Your definition of hiding is meaningless, especially here on Usenet.
Actually, it's 100% accurate.
That would require you proving that statement then.

And even you attempt at proving the assertion, that would be a
first............
You are unable to preach your hate with
your name.
In other words, because you can't refute my cogent points, you label the
"hate" and thereby delude yourself that you have articulated a sound point!

ROFLMFAO..............
You would be rejected by everyone, without the ability to
work or live. You would be treated like the scum that you are. Shunned
and hated. You hide cause your a sick extremist bitch preaching hate
that Americans have rejected.
Wow, I can see that my posts really cut you deep. Expect more,
libtard...........
groups trimmed. hate spam sucks.
Groups restored.

After all I started this thread, so I own it, bitch.............
M***@silent.com
2009-04-26 19:14:32 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 07:00:55 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
You are unable to preach your hate with
your name.
In other words, because you can't refute my cogent points, you label the
"hate" and thereby delude yourself that you have articulated a sound point!
You haven't had a "point" since you been around here,
you fuckwit. You're nothing more than a gasbag whose
entire range of intellect is pronouncing what you say
as fact
Post by MioMyo
You would be rejected by everyone, without the ability to
work or live. You would be treated like the scum that you are. Shunned
and hated. You hide cause your a sick extremist bitch preaching hate
that Americans have rejected.
Wow, I can see that my posts really cut you deep. Expect more,
libtard...........
Laughter does cut deep, Whineo----that's what you put
out
Post by MioMyo
After all I started this thread, so I own it, bitch.............
But not all them rightwing dicks in your mouth, Whineo.
MioMyo
2009-04-26 22:10:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by M***@silent.com
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 07:00:55 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
You are unable to preach your hate with
your name.
In other words, because you can't refute my cogent points, you label the
"hate" and thereby delude yourself that you have articulated a sound point!
when the congressional record proves otherwise
You haven't had a "point" since you been around here,
you fuckwit. You're nothing more than a gasbag whose
entire range of intellect is pronouncing what you say
as fact
You're the one basing your claims on supposition. I've provided credible
sources, tard, so the only thing you're depending on is that pelosi isn't
lying when the congressional record proves otherwise.
Post by M***@silent.com
Post by MioMyo
You would be rejected by everyone, without the ability to
work or live. You would be treated like the scum that you are. Shunned
and hated. You hide cause your a sick extremist bitch preaching hate
that Americans have rejected.
Wow, I can see that my posts really cut you deep. Expect more,
libtard...........
Laughter does cut deep, Whineo----that's what you put
out
Post by MioMyo
After all I started this thread, so I own it, bitch.............
But not all them rightwing dicks in your mouth, Whineo.
geno4321
2009-04-25 15:23:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by M***@silent.com
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 18:24:10 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
"Flat out, they never briefed us that this was happening," she said.
Considering the last 8 years of lying by Bush's
administration----most REAL americans who can think
would tend to believe her---rather than Cheny/Bush
And during Clinton's 8 years there was not one lie.
And he never dropped his pants. What a comedian you are.
Lamont Cranston
2009-04-27 14:43:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by geno4321
Post by M***@silent.com
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 18:24:10 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
"Flat out, they never briefed us that this was
happening," she said.
Considering the last 8 years of lying by Bush's
administration----most REAL americans who can think
would tend to believe her---rather than Cheny/Bush
And during Clinton's 8 years there was not one lie.
And he never dropped his pants. What a comedian you are.
"But, Clinton...but, Clinton..." ROTFL! Clinton has been
out of office for over 8 years and the wingnuts still resort
to the standard "But, Clinton...but, Clinton."
Frank Pittel
2009-04-25 16:46:46 UTC
Permalink
In alt.politics.usa.republican Mike-***@silent.com wrote:
: On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 18:24:10 -0700, "MioMyo"
: <***@Somewhere.com> wrote:

: >"Flat out, they never briefed us that this was happening," she said.

: Considering the last 8 years of lying by Bush's
: administration----most REAL americans who can think
: would tend to believe her---rather than Cheny/Bush

Nice try at changing the subject.
--
-------------------
Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
Frank Pittel
2009-04-25 16:46:22 UTC
Permalink
The whore of the house is lying through her teeth and anyone with a functioning
brain knows it.


In alt.politics.usa.republican MioMyo <***@somewhere.com> wrote:
: Indeed anyone who believes the Imperial Princess Pelosi and, for that
: matter, a handful of democrat leaders in congress didn't know about the
: enhanced interrogation techniques now being charaded as "torture," well they
: are either brain dead, liars or hypocrites themselves. Yes this bitch knew.
: Just look at the plastic, grim mish, phony smile always plaster on that mug
: of hers......

: http://voices.washingtonpost.com/capitol-briefing/2009/04/pelosi_denies_knowing_interrog.html?hpid=topnews

: Pelosi Denies Knowing Interrogation Techniques Were Used
: By Paul Kane

: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) today said congressional leaders were
: never briefed about the use of an enhanced interrogation practice, rejecting
: GOP claims that leadership was aware of the controversial tactics by late
: 2002.
: Pelosi said the select few lawmakers who were briefed about handling of
: detainees from the war on terror, were then forbidden from discussing what
: they had learned with their colleagues. This produced an environment in
: which the top lawmakers were told of the existence of legal opinions
: supporting the rationale for waterboarding detainees, but never told that it
: was actually being used, according to Pelosi.

: "Flat out, they never briefed us that this was happening," she said.

: In late 2002, Pelosi was the ranking member of the House intelligence
: committee, while Porter Goss (R-Fla.) was chairman, when they first learned
: of the general nature of the interrogation techniques that were under
: consideration by the CIA's top officials. They were part of the so-called
: "Gang of Four" briefings given to the top members of the intelligence panels
: in the House and Senate. Pelosi continued receiving highly classified
: briefings when she became Democratic leader in 2003, as is custom to brief
: the top Democrat and Republican in each of the two chambers.

: Republicans have repeatedly cited these briefings to reject calls from
: Pelosi and many congressional Democrats to create a "truth commission" to
: investigate alleged abuses in interrogations. Those calls grew louder after
: last week's release of the legal memos that the Bush administration used,
: from the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel, to explain what was
: allowed and what would break international anti-torture laws.

: "All of this information was downloaded to congressional leaders of both
: parties with no objections being raised," House Minority Leader John Boehner
: (R-Ohio) told reporters today, specifically citing Pelosi as someone who
: received the briefings. "Not a word was raised at the time, not one word."

: Rep. Peter Hoekstra (R-Mich), the ranking member of the House intelligence
: panel, argued the same point in an op-ed in today's Wall Street Journal.

: Pelosi denied these claims. "We were not -- I repeat -- were not told that
: waterboarding or any of these other enhanced interrogation methods were
: used. What they did tell us is that they had . . . the Office of Legal
: Counsel opinions [and] that they could be used, but not that they would,"
: she said.

: She said some officials, such as Goss, who went on to become CIA director,
: argued the lawmakers should have known the waterboarding would be used
: because they were told it was a legal practice. But she said they had no way
: of knowing that for certain, and they were then forbidden from talking about
: what they had learned so they could not work to outlaw the practice.

: She summed up the briefings this way: "This is what they're doing. That's
: all they do. They don't come in to consult. They come in to notify. They
: come in to notify. And you can't -- you can't change what they're doing
: unless you can act as a committee or as a class. You can't change what
: they're doing."
: *****************************

: <Mike-***@silent.com> wrote in message
: news:***@4ax.com...
: > On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 04:39:18 -0700, "MioMyo"
: > <***@Somewhere.com> wrote:
: >
: >>Pelosi Denies Knowing Interrogation Techniques Were Used
: >>By Paul Kane
: >
: > Yet when Bush was PROVEN to have lied about Coke Use,
: > Desertion, WMD---you found nothing amiss.

: When did that happen, libtard?

: > Stupid fuck

: Indeed you are....................
--
-------------------
Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
Frank Pittel
2009-04-25 16:45:29 UTC
Permalink
In alt.politics.usa.republican Mike-***@silent.com wrote:
: On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 04:39:18 -0700, "MioMyo"
: <***@Somewhere.com> wrote:

: >Pelosi Denies Knowing Interrogation Techniques Were Used
: >By Paul Kane

: Yet when Bush was PROVEN to have lied about Coke Use,
: Desertion, WMD---you found nothing amiss.

Your credible proof that Bush used coke, deserted or lied about
wmd is................???? Remember that's credible proof. Not
a bunch of kook fantasies posted on a kook website and don't
bother trying to post the forged rather memo as being credible
proof.
--
-------------------
Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
RichTravsky
2009-04-26 04:57:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by MioMyo
Indeed anyone who believes the Imperial Princess Pelosi and, for that
matter, a handful of democrat leaders in congress didn't know about the
enhanced interrogation techniques now being charaded as "torture," well they
are either brain dead, liars or hypocrites themselves. Yes this bitch knew.
Just look at the plastic, grim mish, phony smile always plaster on that mug
of hers......
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=10568372
As National Security Adviser to former President George W. Bush, Condoleezza
Rice verbally approved the CIA's request to subject alleged al Qaeda terrorist
Abu Zubaydah to waterboarding in July 2002.

It was the earliest known decision by a Bush Administration official to okay
use of the simulated drowning technique.

Rice's role was detailed in a narrative released yesterday by the Senate
intelligence committee. It provides the most detailed timeline yet for how the
CIA's harsh interrogation programme was conceived and approved at the highest
levels in the White House.

The new timeline shows that Rice played a greater role than she admitted last
year in written testimony to the Senate armed services committee.
...
MioMyo
2009-04-27 13:08:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by MioMyo
Indeed anyone who believes the Imperial Princess Pelosi and, for that
matter, a handful of democrat leaders in congress didn't know about the
enhanced interrogation techniques now being charaded as "torture," well they
are either brain dead, liars or hypocrites themselves. Yes this bitch
knew.
Just look at the plastic, grim mish, phony smile always plaster on that mug
of hers......
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/capitol-briefing/2009/04/pelosi_deni...
Pelosi Denies Knowing Interrogation Techniques Were Used
By Paul Kane
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) today said congressional leaders were
never briefed about the use of an enhanced interrogation practice, rejecting
GOP claims that leadership was aware of the controversial tactics by late
2002.
Pelosi said the select few lawmakers who were briefed about handling of
detainees from the war on terror, were then forbidden from discussing what
they had learned with their colleagues. This produced an environment in
which the top lawmakers were told of the existence of legal opinions
supporting the rationale for waterboarding detainees, but never told that it
was actually being used, according to Pelosi.
"Flat out, they never briefed us that this was happening," she said.
In late 2002, Pelosi was the ranking member of the House intelligence
committee, while Porter Goss (R-Fla.) was chairman, when they first learned
of the general nature of the interrogation techniques that were under
consideration by the CIA's top officials. They were part of the so-called
"Gang of Four" briefings given to the top members of the intelligence panels
in the House and Senate. Pelosi continued receiving highly classified
briefings when she became Democratic leader in 2003, as is custom to brief
the top Democrat and Republican in each of the two chambers.
Republicans have repeatedly cited these briefings to reject calls from
Pelosi and many congressional Democrats to create a "truth commission" to
investigate alleged abuses in interrogations. Those calls grew louder after
last week's release of the legal memos that the Bush administration used,
from the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel, to explain what was
allowed and what would break international anti-torture laws.
"All of this information was downloaded to congressional leaders of both
parties with no objections being raised," House Minority Leader John Boehner
(R-Ohio) told reporters today, specifically citing Pelosi as someone who
received the briefings. "Not a word was raised at the time, not one word."
Rep. Peter Hoekstra (R-Mich), the ranking member of the House intelligence
panel, argued the same point in an op-ed in today's Wall Street Journal.
+What Boner and Hackstra are conveniently leaving out is that you're
+not allowed to raise questions or objections. These briefings are
+little more than very vague updates that are given reluctantly and
+only because legally they have to be. "Here's what we're doing in
+broad outline. Thank you and good night. Don't let the door hit you in
+the ass on the way out." It's not at all clear that Pelosi "knew," and
+her hands would have been tied even if she had known. Even if she did
+know, what was she supposed to do? Leak classified information to the
+media? She's not Karl Rove and would never be allowed to get away with
+something like that.


And that's the way these hearings are, even now under bamby. Still that has
NEVER stopped dems from going public later screaming to their liberal media
whores. They wouldn't have had to tell specifics, just that they believed
the administration was condoning torture.

Why didn't she & other dems? You logic doesn't past the muster since giving
out the memo now or then is no different, plus it is VERY CLEAR THAT PELOSI
was at the meetings and WAS BRIEF>

The Imperial Princess Pelosi is a LIAR & A HYPOCRITE....

And that much is VERY CLEAR....................
M***@silent.com
2009-04-27 15:19:49 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 06:08:44 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
And that's the way these hearings are, even now under bamby.
That's a non-issue

NO evidence exists that proves that briefings contained
the information now being said was known.
MioMyo
2009-04-28 01:44:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by M***@silent.com
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 06:08:44 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
And that's the way these hearings are, even now under bamby.
That's a non-issue
NO evidence exists that proves that briefings contained
the information now being said was known.
Tell Christopher H that. He's the one who engaged that argument, but I guess
you were too stupid to figure that much out, huh tard????
Loading...