Rudy Canoza
2008-12-12 19:31:21 UTC
Regarding this pro-queer indoctrination exercise in a small Wisconsin
high school that the queer-agenda sympathizers have laughably attempted
to call a "critical thinking" exercise, which was reported on in World
Net Daily, Bill Zaumen has lamely criticized WND for allegedly omitting
key facts. In fact, WND reported on every fact that Zaumen claims they
omitted.
Zaumen's claim:
"Yes it [WND] did [omit key facts]: the facts that were omitted is that
this was in an English class and that the material was being used to
encourage critical thinking"
But the WND story did state this, very clearly:
The mother of a Wisconsin teenager was stunned when her high school
senior brought home a questionnaire assigned by his *English* teacher
that asked, among several provocative questions, "Is it possible that
your heterosexuality stems from a neurotic fear of others of the
same sex?"
The mother, Marilyn Hanson, reviewed the questionnaire and thought it
completely inappropriate for any class, but especially for a required
*English* class, where, Hanson told WND, "They should be taught to
read and write and prepare for college."
...
Hanson told WND she went the next morning to see her son's teacher at
Pecatonica High School in tiny Blanchardville, Wis., population 806.
"What does this questionnaire have to do with *English* class?"
Hanson asked.
Hanson told WND the teacher's response was that the questions were
not an assignment but a discussion guide for the day's class on
"tolerance."
...
Principal Dave McSherry, however, told WND that the discussion was
part of a comprehensive curriculum in *critical* *thinking* skills,
preparing the students to make decisions on their own in college and
beyond.
"Our *English* department does excellent work in writing language
arts, getting kids to be able to discuss and debate issues, and
engage in *critical* *thinking*," McSherry said.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=82529
Zaumen, quite clearly, was wrong; and because he had made this claim
repeatedly, and had been shown that the claim was false, then for him to
stand by it is proof that he was lying. He *knew* when he wrote this
that the WND story included the very facts he claimed they omitted.
The WND story omitted *no* pertinent fact of the story. Zaumen lied in
stating that.
Subsequently, Zaumen lied about having previously lied. He is,
obviously, a chronic and reflexive liar.
high school that the queer-agenda sympathizers have laughably attempted
to call a "critical thinking" exercise, which was reported on in World
Net Daily, Bill Zaumen has lamely criticized WND for allegedly omitting
key facts. In fact, WND reported on every fact that Zaumen claims they
omitted.
Zaumen's claim:
"Yes it [WND] did [omit key facts]: the facts that were omitted is that
this was in an English class and that the material was being used to
encourage critical thinking"
But the WND story did state this, very clearly:
The mother of a Wisconsin teenager was stunned when her high school
senior brought home a questionnaire assigned by his *English* teacher
that asked, among several provocative questions, "Is it possible that
your heterosexuality stems from a neurotic fear of others of the
same sex?"
The mother, Marilyn Hanson, reviewed the questionnaire and thought it
completely inappropriate for any class, but especially for a required
*English* class, where, Hanson told WND, "They should be taught to
read and write and prepare for college."
...
Hanson told WND she went the next morning to see her son's teacher at
Pecatonica High School in tiny Blanchardville, Wis., population 806.
"What does this questionnaire have to do with *English* class?"
Hanson asked.
Hanson told WND the teacher's response was that the questions were
not an assignment but a discussion guide for the day's class on
"tolerance."
...
Principal Dave McSherry, however, told WND that the discussion was
part of a comprehensive curriculum in *critical* *thinking* skills,
preparing the students to make decisions on their own in college and
beyond.
"Our *English* department does excellent work in writing language
arts, getting kids to be able to discuss and debate issues, and
engage in *critical* *thinking*," McSherry said.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=82529
Zaumen, quite clearly, was wrong; and because he had made this claim
repeatedly, and had been shown that the claim was false, then for him to
stand by it is proof that he was lying. He *knew* when he wrote this
that the WND story included the very facts he claimed they omitted.
The WND story omitted *no* pertinent fact of the story. Zaumen lied in
stating that.
Subsequently, Zaumen lied about having previously lied. He is,
obviously, a chronic and reflexive liar.