LIAR - Fox News has never advocated killing abortionists!

They also happen to be the same voices as those behind
the 9/11 conspiracy innuendos. It would not amaze me to
find out the Tiller murder was an act of subterfuge by someone
espousing the same ideas.

Jail Bushies

2009-06-05 04:41:22 UTC

The problem is the ones screaming this lie have convinced themselves and
each other it is so. Furthermore, what's amazing is once it's said and
fuels their preconceived notions and hatred for Fox, these lemming
sycophants don't ask for any proof of it whatsoever. When anyone who they
deem the enemy (that's you now) ask, they merely revert to attack mode and
demonize for the asking....

WRONG! O'Reilly in particular lamblasted Dr. Tiller, unleashing the
wingnuts to kill the Doctor.

Once again, Bill O'Reilly has lived up to his reputation as a lying liar.

You just can't make this stuff up; but Bill O'Reilly certainly does. On a
recent Factor, he responded to an e-mailer who asked him whether his
constant invoking of the descriptor "baby killer," after Dr. Tiller's name,
could have inflamed the shooter. America's all knowing and all wise Daddy
claimed that the "doctor was involved in a criminal case. I reported what
groups were calling him. I reported accurately." Memo to Bill: Oh, no you
didn't! To assert that what he said was in the context of "reporting"
indicates a certain denial of reality. But this is nothing new for Bill O'Reilly
who still thinks of himself as a working class kid from Levittown, NY who is
"looking out" for us - Not! Bill, as a good Roman Catholic, should be hot
trotting his skinny toukis over to the nearest confessional because he told
yet another lie, which if I recall from my Catholic background, is
considered a sin - along with bearing false witness which O'Reilly did, on
many occasions, in calling Tiller a killer. But that's not a problem for
Bill O'Reilly who subscribes to the philosophy of George Costanza who said
"it's not a lie if you believe it."

Is Bill trying to "walk back" his incendiary rhetoric about Dr. Tiller -
rhetoric which has resulted in an abundance of commentary regarding how
Bill, like Lady Macbeth, might have some "spots" on his hands? That's the
question asked in a video, done by Media Matters, which contrasts Bill's
recent comments with past practice. Bill's recent comments, at the beginning
of the video, show that he is engaging in the same kind of incendiary, anti
abortion code talk (a shout out to his fans?) with the next comment about
how Dr. Tiller "destroyed" 60,000 fetuses. Bill could have used something a
little less flaming and fact based such as "performed 60,000 abortions;" but
hey, O'Reilly has sick minds to feed. In case his fellow "lifers" didn't get
it, he repeated the number. He went on to cite the number of late term
abortions performed in 2003 alone. (Nice work Bill, instead of focusing on
your incendiary language, you change the focus to Tiller's practice. Is that
to make your case that Tiller was the real "killer.") He then spoke of
Tiller's estimated income as if that has anything to do with the case. (Memo
to Bill: You make millions for spewing hatred and lies. At least Tiller was
performing a vital medical service.) Bill, playing doctor (a fantasy, I'm
sure, if you know what I'm saying!) claimed that late term abortions are
rarely necessary and that few doctor's perform the surgery. (Yeah, Bill,
they don't want to get shot by anti abortions zealots). Once again, I
questioned what relevance all this had. Bill editorialized, "none of that
seemed to matter to Tiller, nicknamed the "baby killer" by pro-life groups"
who, according to Bill, were reacting to Tiller's belief that he was helping
women. The chyron above the graphic of Bill's comments read "abortion
anarchy." The rest of the video consists of clips of Bill just casually
throwing out the phrase and not appending it with a comment that this is a
"nickname" (isn't it cute, it rhymes!) given to the Doctor by Bill's anti
abortions soul mates.

Comment: As the video was time limited, only a few of the 28 instances
[http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2009/05/31/tiller/] of American Taliban O'Reilly's
Tiller as Killer references, in his jihad against Tiller, were shown. It
wasn't that long ago, that Bill tossed out the "baby killer"
[http://www.newshounds.us/2009/03/30/bill_oreilly_continues_to_smear_dr_tiller_and_insult_women.php]
catch phrase during a discussion of the Tiller acquittal with Glen Beck.
Bill's denunciation of Dr. Tiller as a killer, as shown in the video and in
the other documented instances,
[http://mediamatters.org/research/200906020046] went beyond the context of
reporting on the criminal case. Bill used every opportunity to invoke Tiller
as Killer including discussions of the nomination of Kathleen Sebelius who
despite Bill and his anti abortion cohorts is now HHS Secretary. Bill did
love the little phrase. Bill even claimed that he had "incontrovertible
evidence" [http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,227658,00.html] (from an
interview titled "Killing Babies In America") that Tiller was "executing
babies." (How'd that work out, Bill?) And during a discussion, shown on the
video, O'Reilly accuses pro-choice (not "pro-abortion") Kathleen Sebelius of
"wanting the babies done for" so he's accusing her of being a murderer, too.
(Memo to Bill: she supports giving the women the right to make their own,
private, and very difficult decisions.) But one wonders how Bill would feel
if Keith Olbermann referred to him as Bill-do, Dildo? But words do matter
and O'Reilly's constant repetition of the meme that Dr. George Tiller, a man
who performed abortions in accordance with the law, was a murderer is
reprehensible for someone who claims to be a "no spin" TV journalist. Oh,
and there's another lie that needs to be pointed out. Earlier this week, O'Reilly
claimed that he never incited anybody. Scuse me, how about this call to
jihad from Mullah O'Reilly? Once again, Bill O'Reilly has lived up to his
reputation as a lying liar. But keep spinning Bill. Apart from your crowd,
the rest of us consider Dr. Tiller to be a man of honor - a description that
will never apply to Bill O'Reilly whose hands are very dirty!

http://www.nowpublic.com/oreilly_calls_for_massive_protest_few_show_up

Mullah Limbaugh; Loading Image...

MioMyo

2009-06-05 10:07:15 UTC

For all your whining, you cannot support your assertion ONCE that O'Reilly
advocated Tiller's death.

What you crying amounts to is you are upset that O'Reilly repeatedly
denounced and went after Tiller for being a PARTIAL BIRTH ABORTION
killer.......

That's called FREE SPEECH......

So.... GFY..............

The problem is the ones screaming this lie have convinced themselves and
each other it is so. Furthermore, what's amazing is once it's said and
fuels their preconceived notions and hatred for Fox, these lemming
sycophants don't ask for any proof of it whatsoever. When anyone who they
deem the enemy (that's you now) ask, they merely revert to attack mode
and demonize for the asking....

WRONG! O'Reilly in particular lamblasted Dr. Tiller, unleashing the
wingnuts to kill the Doctor.
Once again, Bill O'Reilly has lived up to his reputation as a lying liar.
You just can't make this stuff up; but Bill O'Reilly certainly does. On a
recent Factor, he responded to an e-mailer who asked him whether his
constant invoking of the descriptor "baby killer," after Dr. Tiller's
name, could have inflamed the shooter. America's all knowing and all wise
Daddy claimed that the "doctor was involved in a criminal case. I reported
what groups were calling him. I reported accurately." Memo to Bill: Oh, no
you didn't! To assert that what he said was in the context of "reporting"
indicates a certain denial of reality. But this is nothing new for Bill
O'Reilly who still thinks of himself as a working class kid from
Levittown, NY who is "looking out" for us - Not! Bill, as a good Roman
Catholic, should be hot trotting his skinny toukis over to the nearest
confessional because he told yet another lie, which if I recall from my
Catholic background, is considered a sin - along with bearing false
witness which O'Reilly did, on many occasions, in calling Tiller a killer.
But that's not a problem for Bill O'Reilly who subscribes to the
philosophy of George Costanza who said "it's not a lie if you believe it."
Is Bill trying to "walk back" his incendiary rhetoric about Dr. Tiller -
rhetoric which has resulted in an abundance of commentary regarding how
Bill, like Lady Macbeth, might have some "spots" on his hands? That's the
question asked in a video, done by Media Matters, which contrasts Bill's
recent comments with past practice. Bill's recent comments, at the
beginning of the video, show that he is engaging in the same kind of
incendiary, anti abortion code talk (a shout out to his fans?) with the
next comment about how Dr. Tiller "destroyed" 60,000 fetuses. Bill could
have used something a little less flaming and fact based such as
"performed 60,000 abortions;" but hey, O'Reilly has sick minds to feed. In
case his fellow "lifers" didn't get it, he repeated the number. He went on
to cite the number of late term abortions performed in 2003 alone. (Nice
work Bill, instead of focusing on your incendiary language, you change the
focus to Tiller's practice. Is that to make your case that Tiller was the
real "killer.") He then spoke of Tiller's estimated income as if that has
anything to do with the case. (Memo to Bill: You make millions for spewing
hatred and lies. At least Tiller was performing a vital medical service.)
Bill, playing doctor (a fantasy, I'm sure, if you know what I'm saying!)
claimed that late term abortions are rarely necessary and that few
doctor's perform the surgery. (Yeah, Bill, they don't want to get shot by
anti abortions zealots). Once again, I questioned what relevance all this
had. Bill editorialized, "none of that seemed to matter to Tiller,
nicknamed the "baby killer" by pro-life groups" who, according to Bill,
were reacting to Tiller's belief that he was helping women. The chyron
above the graphic of Bill's comments read "abortion anarchy." The rest of
the video consists of clips of Bill just casually throwing out the phrase
and not appending it with a comment that this is a "nickname" (isn't it
cute, it rhymes!) given to the Doctor by Bill's anti abortions soul mates.
Comment: As the video was time limited, only a few of the 28 instances
[http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2009/05/31/tiller/] of American Taliban
O'Reilly's Tiller as Killer references, in his jihad against Tiller, were
shown. It wasn't that long ago, that Bill tossed out the "baby killer"
[http://www.newshounds.us/2009/03/30/bill_oreilly_continues_to_smear_dr_tiller_and_insult_women.php]
catch phrase during a discussion of the Tiller acquittal with Glen Beck.
Bill's denunciation of Dr. Tiller as a killer, as shown in the video and
in the other documented instances,
[http://mediamatters.org/research/200906020046] went beyond the context of
reporting on the criminal case. Bill used every opportunity to invoke
Tiller as Killer including discussions of the nomination of Kathleen
Sebelius who despite Bill and his anti abortion cohorts is now HHS
Secretary. Bill did love the little phrase. Bill even claimed that he had
"incontrovertible evidence"
[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,227658,00.html] (from an interview
titled "Killing Babies In America") that Tiller was "executing babies."
(How'd that work out, Bill?) And during a discussion, shown on the video,
O'Reilly accuses pro-choice (not "pro-abortion") Kathleen Sebelius of
"wanting the babies done for" so he's accusing her of being a murderer,
too. (Memo to Bill: she supports giving the women the right to make their
own, private, and very difficult decisions.) But one wonders how Bill
would feel if Keith Olbermann referred to him as Bill-do, Dildo? But words
do matter and O'Reilly's constant repetition of the meme that Dr. George
Tiller, a man who performed abortions in accordance with the law, was a
murderer is reprehensible for someone who claims to be a "no spin" TV
journalist. Oh, and there's another lie that needs to be pointed out.
Earlier this week, O'Reilly claimed that he never incited anybody. Scuse
me, how about this call to jihad from Mullah O'Reilly? Once again, Bill
O'Reilly has lived up to his reputation as a lying liar. But keep spinning
Bill. Apart from your crowd, the rest of us consider Dr. Tiller to be a
man of honor - a description that will never apply to Bill O'Reilly whose
hands are very dirty!
http://www.nowpublic.com/oreilly_calls_for_massive_protest_few_show_up
Mullah Limbaugh; http://www.allhatnocattle.net/mullah_pigboy.jpg

Bob Eld

2009-06-05 14:42:58 UTC

Post by MioMyo
For all your whining, you cannot support your assertion ONCE that

O'Reilly

Post by MioMyo
advocated Tiller's death.
What you crying amounts to is you are upset that O'Reilly repeatedly
denounced and went after Tiller for being a PARTIAL BIRTH ABORTION
killer.......
That's called FREE SPEECH......
So.... GFY..............

Meaow-Mao, another republican apologist for murder.

MioMyo

2009-06-06 02:58:08 UTC

Post by MioMyo
For all your whining, you cannot support your assertion ONCE that

O'Reilly

Meaow-Mao, another republican apologist for murder.

Correction- you're the apologist for the some 60,000 partial birth abortion
babies Tiller murdered...

MioMyo

2009-06-07 00:29:27 UTC

Post by MioMyo
For all your whining, you cannot support your assertion ONCE that

O'Reilly

Meaow-Mao, another republican apologist for murder.

Correction- you're the apologist for the some 60,000 partial birth abortion
babies Tiller murdered.

<> Actually, there is no such thing as partial birth abortion.

Actually it's the accepted vernacular, tard, but I agree let's us a more
precise description, such as:

"The termination of a fully formed living & growing human fetus in its 3rd
trimester of gestation"

Now should we also describe the process by which the life is terminated?

<> it's a
<> made-up phrase the pro-lifers invented to refer to Intact Dilation and
<> Extraction, which there is no proof Dr. Tiller ever did, in order to
<> get people all stirred up.

So you think PBA is just another Ho-Hum day at the clinic?

<> You fucks, with the help of the rabidly pro-
<> life Kansas AG, brought a court case against Dr. Tiller, screaming
<> that he violated Kansas law.

So Constitutional due process should only be used by the privileged
left-wing fascist?

<> After he beat your brains out in court
<> without even working up a sweat, a furious Roeder shot him in the back
<> as he went to church.

Tiller's murderer is now receiving his due process, and should he qualify, I
would support capital punishment for the premeditated murder of Tiller....
satisfied, tard?

MioMyo

2009-06-07 18:58:10 UTC

Post by MioMyo
For all your whining, you cannot support your assertion ONCE that

O'Reilly

Meaow-Mao, another republican apologist for murder.

Correction- you're the apologist for the some 60,000 partial birth abortion
babies Tiller murdered.

<> Actually, there is no such thing as partial birth abortion.
Actually it's the accepted vernacular, tard, but I agree let's us a more

<> Nope, it's just a phrase you coined so you could get the anti-abortion
<> terrorists all stirred up.

Youu too would like to use euphanism to describe this heinous act of ending
the life of a fully formed human being, which in many cases could survive
outside the womb!

Post by MioMyo
"The termination of a fully formed living & growing human fetus in its 3rd
trimester of gestation"
Now should we also describe the process by which the life is terminated?
<> it's a
<> made-up phrase the pro-lifers invented to refer to Intact Dilation and
<> Extraction, which there is no proof Dr. Tiller ever did, in order to
<> get people all stirred up.
So you think PBA is just another Ho-Hum day at the clinic?

<> So you agree, there IS no evidence at all that Dr. Tiller used it, is
<> there?

He admitted to performing partial birth abortions, tard. He and only a few
others in the country admittedly did/do....

Deny that all you want but it's fact....

<> And actually, at his trial, he used late-term abortion
<> procedures fully within the law of the state of Kansas, in order to
<> save women's lives, didn't he?

That's not the point. The state too puts death row inmates to death under
the color of law, but many protest it- which is their right.

But you think freedom only applies to your ethical standards. It doesn't
tard...

Post by MioMyo
<> You fucks, with the help of the rabidly pro-
<> life Kansas AG, brought a court case against Dr. Tiller, screaming
<> that he violated Kansas law.
So Constitutional due process should only be used by the privileged
left-wing fascist?

<> Are you telling me that didn't happen, Yo-Yo?

Your starwman nonsense is so noted. But hey without strawman assertions, you
wouldn't have anything to say whatsoever....

Post by MioMyo
<> After he beat your brains out in court
<> without even working up a sweat, a furious Roeder shot him in the back
<> as he went to church.
Tiller's murderer is now receiving his due process, and should he qualify, I
would support capital punishment for the premeditated murder of Tiller....
satisfied, tard?

<> So much for your 'pro-life' stance, eh?

Another strawman of yours which only shows your stupidity and ignorance....

<> I don't answer your questions,

Cry me a river tard and ask me if I care. Oh and while you're at it,
GFY......

ROFLMFAO...............

MioMyo

2009-06-10 02:45:03 UTC

Post by MioMyo
For all your whining, you cannot support your assertion ONCE that

O'Reilly

Meaow-Mao, another republican apologist for murder.

Correction- you're the apologist for the some 60,000 partial birth abortion
babies Tiller murdered.

<> Actually, there is no such thing as partial birth abortion.
Actually it's the accepted vernacular, tard, but I agree let's us a more

<> Nope, it's just a phrase you coined so you could get the anti-abortion
<> terrorists all stirred up.
Youu too would like to use euphanism to describe this heinous act of ending
the life of a fully formed human being, which in many cases could survive
outside the womb!

<> I beg your pardon.

GFY.......

<> Just because it gets you all cranked up does not
<> mean it does me or any of the women going into the clinic. I like in
<> your bleeding heart concern for the fetuses,

3rd trimester is long past the fetus stage tard. You have a fully formed
human being asswipe. But do use that term in order to make yourself feel
okay about terminating a human life.....

<> you never once mention
<> the mother who's life is in jeopardy or even if you'd ever be willing
<> to babysit. I

Because that is not always the case in partial birth abortions. When it is
and also when the life of the baby is likely terminal, then and only then is
it justified. But you weren't around in the 70s when abortion first became
legal. first trimester abortion were the only ones allowed and 2nd
trimester under very rare & extreme circumstances. 3rd trimesters were not
allowed, nor should they be.

<> certainly hope you've adopted some of them.

Why should I? They are not my responsibility. Besides the last I heard there
was still a waiting list of wanting parents for adoption.

Post by MioMyo
"The termination of a fully formed living & growing human fetus in its 3rd
trimester of gestation"
Now should we also describe the process by which the life is terminated?

<> Why not? You always do. Make sure you have the right one, though.

Suction of the brains first........

That must be what happened to you- you're a failed partial birth abortion
reject......

Post by MioMyo
<> it's a
<> made-up phrase the pro-lifers invented to refer to Intact Dilation and
<> Extraction, which there is no proof Dr. Tiller ever did, in order to
<> get people all stirred up.
So you think PBA is just another Ho-Hum day at the clinic?

<> Did he ever do any late-term abortions that were against Kansas law?

So O'Reilly can't speak out against what he considers immoral, whether
leagal or not without your approval? GFY......

<> Did he 'admit' to using them in the case he was charged with?

Post by MioMyo
<> And actually, at his trial, he used late-term abortion
<> procedures fully within the law of the state of Kansas, in order to
<> save women's lives, didn't he?
That's not the point.

<> OH, YES it is. That was the exact point Dr. Tiller's trial centered
<> on, wasn't it?

That's not the point of this discussion. The point is you think you have the
right to silence O'Reilly. You don't, so GFY......

Post by MioMyo
The state too puts death row inmates to death under
the color of law, but many protest it- which is their right.

<> Don't try equating yourself with capital punishment protestors. They
<> don't block the entrance to the execution chamber or try and pour
<> epony into the door locks, now do they?

You're right. The unborn didn't do anything wrong, now did they?

Post by MioMyo
But you think freedom only applies to your ethical standards. It doesn't
tard...

<> Whine some more about how your PICKED on. Maybe it'll help you sleep
<> at night. LOL. Hey, guess what we're going to do now? On the top of
<> every clinic there will be a great big billboard that will say NUMBER
<> OF ABORTIONS PERFORMED TODAY: XX
<> NUMBER YOU PREVENTED: 0
<> It's going to be staring down from the top of the clinic, mocking you
<> every single solitary day

Another strawman's of yours?

<> Are you telling me that didn't happen, Yo-Yo?
Your starwman nonsense is so noted. But hey without strawman assertions, you
wouldn't have anything to say whatsoever....

<> Which is why it infuriated you. LOL

Your strawman nonnsense doesn't bother me one bit. But I can see you can't
handle having me point that fact out.....

Post by MioMyo
<> After he beat your brains out in court
<> without even working up a sweat, a furious Roeder shot him in the back
<> as he went to church.
Tiller's murderer is now receiving his due process, and should he
qualify,
I
would support capital punishment for the premeditated murder of Tiller....
satisfied, tard?

<> So much for your 'pro-life' stance, eh?
Another strawman of yours which only shows your stupidity and
ignorance....

<> Showing that you're a hypocrite is ignorant? Since when?

Being pro-death penalty and ant-abortion sets just fine with my ethics.
Maybe you have problems with that, but then again GFY............

Post by MioMyo
<> I don't answer your questions,
Cry me a river tard and ask me if I care. Oh and while you're at it,
GFY......

r***@ignorant.com

2009-06-10 13:00:22 UTC

On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 19:45:03 -0700, "MioMyo"

Post by MioMyo
Because that is not always the case in partial birth abortions. When it is
and also when the life of the baby is likely terminal, then and only then is
it justified. But you weren't around in the 70s when abortion first became
legal.

So when half the american nation breathed a sigh of
relief, you found that objectionable?

MioMyo

2009-06-06 03:01:08 UTC