Discussion:
Pakistan court bulldozes through rulings for Musharraf
(too old to reply)
Zaroc Stone
2007-11-19 13:21:30 UTC
Permalink
Pakistan court bulldozes through rulings for Musharraf

By Kamran Haider

ISLAMABAD (Reuters) - Pakistan's Supreme Court, packed with
government-friendly judges since the imposition of emergency rule,
dismissed on Monday the main challenges to President Pervez
Musharraf's re-election last month.

Once the court clears Musharraf's October 6 victory, he has vowed to
quit as army chief and become a civilian president, although he
remains under fire from the opposition and Western allies for setting
back democracy in nuclear-armed Pakistan.

A bench of 10 judges struck down the five main challenges to
Musharraf's right to contest the election while still army chief. The
sixth and final petition will be heard on Thursday.

"The notification of the president's election cannot be issued because
a petition is still pending. Hopefully, it will be done after that,"
Attorney-General Malik Qayyum told Reuters.

Musharraf's main aim in taking emergency powers was to purge the
Supreme Court of men he feared would annul his re-election.

The Karachi stock market's main index rebounded more than 350 points
from lows following the court's action to end Monday 1.2 percent
higher. It is still nearly 5 percent below pre-emergency levels, but
32 percent up since the start of the year.

During Monday's proceedings, judges warned lawyers they faced contempt
charges and cancellation of their licenses if they persisted in
challenging the legality of Musharraf's new bench.

"You're taking it lightly, but you don't know that your license can be
cancelled and strict action can be taken against you," Justice Nawaz
Abbasi told a lawyer acting for Wajihuddin Ahmed, a former chief
justice, who had run against Musharraf.

On Sunday Musharraf said he was asking the Election Commission to call
a parliamentary election on January 8.

"Inshallah (God willing), the general elections in the country would
be held on January 8," the official Associated Press of Pakistan news
agency quoted Musharraf as saying.

But he gave no date for lifting the state of emergency, despite
hearing from U.S. Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte on
Saturday that the election's credibility would suffer unless the
emergency announced on November 3 was rolled back.

DISPARAGING

Negroponte, who left Pakistan on Sunday, was careful not to undermine
General Musharraf, a crucial U.S. ally in the fight against al Qaeda
and the Taliban. But he stuck to Washington's stated position that
thousands of people detained in the last two weeks should be released
and curbs on the media should be lifted.

Pakistani newspapers were disparaging of Negroponte's failure to back
words with some kind of threat unless Musharraf complied.

"To see the U.S. stick it out on the wrong side of the fence will not
win the latter any approval with the people of Pakistan," Dawn said in
an editorial.

Negroponte said reconciliation was "very desirable" between moderate
political forces, apparently referring to the breakdown of an
understanding between Musharraf and opposition leader Benazir Bhutto
for possible post-election power sharing.

U.S. Ambassador Anne W. Patterson met Bhutto on Monday.

"I am meeting the former prime minister and other political leaders to
confirm American interest in free, fair and transparent elections and
to assure her and all others that we will do everything possible to
ensure that the electoral process takes place," she told journalists
at Bhutto's Karachi residence.

Bhutto said she was undecided whether to participate in polls she
doubted would be fair. She ruled out further negotiations with
Musharraf because of a lack of trust.

The other main opposition party led by Nawaz Sharif, the prime
minister ousted by Musharraf in 1999 and later sent into exile, was
also considering boycotting the elections.

"If the United States gives him $10 billion and does not get him to do
what it wants, how is it going to expect us to make him do what he
does not want to do," Bhutto said.

FRONTIER FRAYING

Most U.S. aid that Pakistan has received since joining a war on
terrorism in late 2001 has gone to its military. The New York Times
reported on Sunday nearly $100 million had been earmarked to help
Musharraf keep his nuclear arsenal secure in a country threatened by
rampant militancy.

Musharraf said emergency rule would remain in place for longer to
reinforce the fight against Islamist militants threatening Pakistan's
stability and ensure security for polls.

Meantime, the army was expected to launch a major operation to crush a
militant movement in Swat, a valley in North West Frontier Province
(NWFP) where hundreds of people have been killed in clashes with
security forces in the past few weeks.

Around 80 people were killed in an outbreak of sectarian violence over
the weekend in Parachinar, the main town in the Kurram tribal agency
bordering Afghanistan, as the security situation in the frontier
region continued to deteriorate.

(Writing by Simon Cameron-Moore; editing by Roger Crabb)V
dank
2007-11-22 17:12:45 UTC
Permalink
Zaroc Stone wrote...
Post by Zaroc Stone
Pakistan court bulldozes through rulings for Musharraf
By Kamran Haider
ISLAMABAD (Reuters) - Pakistan's Supreme Court, packed with
government-friendly judges since the imposition of emergency rule,
dismissed on Monday the main challenges to President Pervez
Musharraf's re-election last month.
What's the point of having a supreme court that simply acts as a
rubber stamp for the dictator's policies? If he is going to be
a dictator he should at least be an efficient dictator, and that
means cutting out the middlemen and their hefty salaries. If
he's going to be civilian president for life as well as supreme
generalissimo for life, he could easily add the title of chief
justice for life, though the extra gold medal might weigh his
uniform down too much.

I always like dictators who play with constitutional concepts
like term limits to take advantage of several terms as president
or prime minister (depending on which post holds the actual
power), then "retiring" to become the prime minister or president
and rewriting the constitution to transfer real power to the
formerly ceremonial head-of-state post he now holds.

Loading...