Discussion:
Reality is Closing in on the Rightards -- Expect More Venom
(too old to reply)
MioMyo
2009-05-02 12:40:18 UTC
Permalink
With Obama's numbers remaining high, hints of economic recovery in the
second half, the implosion of the Republican party, and their heroes
facing possible war-crimes charges, you can expect even more venom
from the Rightards than usual as they give up any pretense of dealing
honestly with the issues and instead turn to shooting the messenger
(ad hominems) instead.
What do you call your little diatribe above if you don't consider it a
substanceless, venomous-partisan (aka- ad hominem) attack, lib?

You better look in the mirror, FIRST, when accusing others of HATE.

Furthermore, if you really wanted honesty, you'd compare bamby's first
100-day polling numbers with other recent presidents. But do not fear
because with altruistic compassion for an inferior foe, I've done your
research for you. See this comparison below:

http://hnn.us/blogs/entries/79295.html
April approval ratings in first year in office.
Bush now 62%
Clinton, 1993 55
Bush, 1989 58
Reagan, 1981 67
Carter, 1977 63
Nixon, 1969 61
Sampling error: +/-3% pts

Whereas currently: Gallup reports that 56% of the public believes that Obama
is doing an excellent/good job.

Honesty requires one acknowledge that bamby is second to last, only beaten
for last by Clinton in first 100-day approval for the last 7-Presidents.

Now it's time for your hate speech response, lib, that is if you have
anything to say at all.......

ROFLMFAO......
M***@silent.com
2009-05-02 13:31:43 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 2 May 2009 05:40:18 -0700, "MioMyo"
Post by MioMyo
With Obama's numbers remaining high, hints of economic recovery in the
second half, the implosion of the Republican party, and their heroes
facing possible war-crimes charges, you can expect even more venom
from the Rightards than usual as they give up any pretense of dealing
honestly with the issues and instead turn to shooting the messenger
(ad hominems) instead.
What do you call your little diatribe above if you don't consider it a
substanceless, venomous-partisan (aka- ad hominem) attack, lib?
What in the above was false?

Your entire history of posting is a litany of unproven
allegation, innuendo, insinuation, conjecture, rumor,
theory, stories and lies, Whineo

That only leaves calling you a dumb asshole----because
no "message" you ever posted here contained any
substance or truth

Loading...