On global warming.

[kujebak]

In 2005 China burned 1.9 billion metric tons of coal (compared to the
current annual U.S. coal production of 1.13 billion metric tons),
mostly
in antiquated, highly polluting power plants built in the early years
of
the Chinese communist state. Based on the current growth rate of
the Chinese economy ( of 10% per year) it is projected that by 2020
the use of coal by China will grow to 2.9 billion tons per year. This
projected INCREASE in China's coal consumption over the next four-
teen years represents as much additional carbon dioxide released in-
to the atmosphere as 3 BILLION Ford Expeditions driven for 15 thou-
sand miles (the average distance driven by Americans each year).
As we all know, China is considered a "developing" country, and as
such it is specifically exempted from any of the provisions of the
Kyoto Protocol. Something to keep in mind for those contemplating
plunking a fat wad on one of those hybrid gizmos for any other
reason than possibly saving a few bucks on gas, and hoping they'll
come out even, if they keep their "environmentally friendly" vehicle
running for 20 to 30 years :-))

[Jack Stone]

Post by kujebak
In 2005 China burned 1.9 billion metric tons of coal (compared to the
current annual U.S. coal production of 1.13 billion metric tons),
mostly
in antiquated, highly polluting power plants built in the early years
of
the Chinese communist state. Based on the current growth rate of
the Chinese economy ( of 10% per year) it is projected that by 2020
the use of coal by China will grow to 2.9 billion tons per year. This
projected INCREASE in China's coal consumption over the next four-
teen years represents as much additional carbon dioxide released in-
to the atmosphere as 3 BILLION Ford Expeditions driven for 15 thou-
sand miles (the average distance driven by Americans each year).
As we all know, China is considered a "developing" country, and as
such it is specifically exempted from any of the provisions of the
Kyoto Protocol. Something to keep in mind for those contemplating
plunking a fat wad on one of those hybrid gizmos for any other
reason than possibly saving a few bucks on gas, and hoping they'll
come out even, if they keep their "environmentally friendly" vehicle
running for 20 to 30 years :-))

The ticket is nothing less than strict breeding control of human vermin and
reducing the size of human population to sustainable numbers. Nothing else
(besides moving the extras somewhere to outer space) will work. Since human
technology doesn't allow humans to move to outer space yet, population
control is the only thing left. Unfortunately, it is the United States that
very strongly oposes any forced birth control of humans. Thanks to religious
freaks, including president Bush. And unfortunately it is those humans who
are on the lowest scale of evolution that breed the most. Intelligent and
self supported humans nowadays do not produce more offspring than they can
take care off, they usually produce two or less children per one couple
already. When you come up with a solution how to eliminate overbreeders and
overusers of this planet's natural resources without being labeled a nazi,
let us know :-) I personally would apply forced sterilization to everyone
who produced two or more children, men and women. That wouldn't hurt anyone
and due to diseases and other events it would lead to reduction of human
population of this planet eventually. And I would also give those couples or
individuals with two or less children extensive tax breaks. Unlike the
present system when breeders get them.
If no human population reduction program takes place soon, the planet itself
or human nature will do it for us. But it won't be some peaceful
sterilization, it will be major wars and diseases that will make WWII in
comparison like a really nice time to live at in human history.
All those environmental programs and treaties are nothing but a bunch of
useless crap trying to have the cake and eat it too. If there was only 2
billion people on this planet, you could burn as much fuel, release as much
carbon dioxide and hydrofluorocarbons in it as you'd please and nothing
would happen. The planet itself would clean it up.
Look at some neighborhoods with individual homes. Some of those idiots don't
even have any trees on them. Just grass, so they don't have to rake the
leaves in the fall. Although it would be perfectly logical not to rake the
leaves, just mow them with a mulching lawnmower so it dissolves into the
ground, providing natural fertilizer. Not even taking into consideration the
natural shade that trees provide in the summer.
Humans as a whole are pretty shit-headed species and if 90% of them (those
worst ones) disappeared tomorrow, it would be no tragedy.
--
Jack Stone

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Lepsi pivo v zaludku nezli voda na plicich."
""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
''
"It's better to have beer in the stomach than water in the lungs."

J. Cimrman

[Stan de SD]

Post by Jack Stone

Post by kujebak
In 2005 China burned 1.9 billion metric tons of coal (compared to the
current annual U.S. coal production of 1.13 billion metric tons),
mostly
in antiquated, highly polluting power plants built in the early years
of
the Chinese communist state. Based on the current growth rate of
the Chinese economy ( of 10% per year) it is projected that by 2020
the use of coal by China will grow to 2.9 billion tons per year. This
projected INCREASE in China's coal consumption over the next four-
teen years represents as much additional carbon dioxide released in-
to the atmosphere as 3 BILLION Ford Expeditions driven for 15 thou-
sand miles (the average distance driven by Americans each year).
As we all know, China is considered a "developing" country, and as
such it is specifically exempted from any of the provisions of the
Kyoto Protocol. Something to keep in mind for those contemplating
plunking a fat wad on one of those hybrid gizmos for any other
reason than possibly saving a few bucks on gas, and hoping they'll
come out even, if they keep their "environmentally friendly" vehicle
running for 20 to 30 years :-))

The ticket is nothing less than strict breeding control of human vermin and
reducing the size of human population to sustainable numbers. Nothing else
(besides moving the extras somewhere to outer space) will work. Since human
technology doesn't allow humans to move to outer space yet, population
control is the only thing left. Unfortunately, it is the United States that
very strongly oposes any forced birth control of humans. Thanks to religious
freaks, including president Bush.

In your haste to blame Bush for everything wrong with the world, you seem to
overlook the fact that it's not native-born American who are overpopulating
the planet. The vast majority of our population growth in this country comes
from immigrants, or immigrant reproducing.

[Jack Stone]

Post by Jack Stone

Post by Jack Stone

Post by kujebak
In 2005 China burned 1.9 billion metric tons of coal (compared to the
current annual U.S. coal production of 1.13 billion metric tons),
mostly
in antiquated, highly polluting power plants built in the early years
of
the Chinese communist state. Based on the current growth rate of
the Chinese economy ( of 10% per year) it is projected that by 2020
the use of coal by China will grow to 2.9 billion tons per year. This
projected INCREASE in China's coal consumption over the next four-
teen years represents as much additional carbon dioxide released in-
to the atmosphere as 3 BILLION Ford Expeditions driven for 15 thou-
sand miles (the average distance driven by Americans each year).
As we all know, China is considered a "developing" country, and as
such it is specifically exempted from any of the provisions of the
Kyoto Protocol. Something to keep in mind for those contemplating
plunking a fat wad on one of those hybrid gizmos for any other
reason than possibly saving a few bucks on gas, and hoping they'll
come out even, if they keep their "environmentally friendly" vehicle
running for 20 to 30 years :-))

The ticket is nothing less than strict breeding control of human vermin

and

Post by Jack Stone
reducing the size of human population to sustainable numbers. Nothing else
(besides moving the extras somewhere to outer space) will work. Since

human

Post by Jack Stone
technology doesn't allow humans to move to outer space yet, population
control is the only thing left. Unfortunately, it is the United States

that

Post by Jack Stone
very strongly oposes any forced birth control of humans. Thanks to

religious

Post by Jack Stone
freaks, including president Bush.

In your haste to blame Bush for everything wrong with the world, you seem to
overlook the fact that it's not native-born American who are

overpopulating

Post by Jack Stone
the planet. The vast majority of our population growth in this country comes
from immigrants, or immigrant reproducing.

It's not about Americans at all. At least not those of European origin. It's
about third world overbreeders, wherever they may live.. And we all know who
they are. And we all also know that Bush is against birth control. Anyone
who is "Pro-Life" (instead of Pro-Choice)nowadays is part of the problem,
not solution.
--
Jack Stone

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Lepsi pivo v zaludku nezli voda na plicich."
""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
''
"It's better to have beer in the stomach than water in the lungs."

J. Cimrman