Living Large on Section 8

[Michael Wise]

One of my neighbors in SF lives in a house where the rent is $2.3k a
month. She pays only $300-400/month with taxpayers paying the remaining
near $2000/month in the form of Section 8 subsidies. I know this, as the
owner of the home is an acquaintance of mine and told me.


When walking by her house, I've noticed she has a 30+" plasma or LCD TV
mounted on her living room wall. I thought it a bit strange that a
person who relies on the working public to keep a roof over their head
has the means to afford a luxury entertainment system.


This week, I noticed she's now driving a brand new Humvee. It seems
crazy that a person could qualify or remain qualified for Section 8
subsidies while having the means to buy $50k+ car and other luxury items.


Does HUD really allow this sort of thing?



--Mike

[t***@yahoo.com.au]

Post by Michael Wise
One of my neighbors in SF lives in a house where the rent is $2.3k a
month. She pays only $300-400/month with taxpayers paying the remaining
near $2000/month in the form of Section 8 subsidies. I know this, as the
owner of the home is an acquaintance of mine and told me.
When walking by her house, I've noticed she has a 30+" plasma or LCD TV
mounted on her living room wall. I thought it a bit strange that a
person who relies on the working public to keep a roof over their head
has the means to afford a luxury entertainment system.
This week, I noticed she's now driving a brand new Humvee. It seems
crazy that a person could qualify or remain qualified for Section 8
subsidies while having the means to buy $50k+ car and other luxury items.
Does HUD really allow this sort of thing?

It's not HUD, it is the jews and their support for welfare programs
for
mexcrement and niggers.

Cut these low lifes off and they would have jobs in 6 weeks.

Ever since FDR the US has wasted three trillion dollars on niggers
and jews. It is time for the White Man in America to say, "No more!"

Thomas

[Avenger]

Post by Michael Wise
One of my neighbors in SF lives in a house where the rent is $2.3k a
month. She pays only $300-400/month with taxpayers paying the remaining
near $2000/month in the form of Section 8 subsidies. I know this, as the
owner of the home is an acquaintance of mine and told me.
When walking by her house, I've noticed she has a 30+" plasma or LCD TV
mounted on her living room wall. I thought it a bit strange that a
person who relies on the working public to keep a roof over their head
has the means to afford a luxury entertainment system.
This week, I noticed she's now driving a brand new Humvee. It seems
crazy that a person could qualify or remain qualified for Section 8
subsidies while having the means to buy $50k+ car and other luxury items.
Does HUD really allow this sort of thing?

I doubt it but I won't definitely say no until I look up the Federal and
State requirements. SF is an expensive area so the sec 8 limits are high and
then this female may have kids and qualify for a larger place so it's
possible. I believe that the subsidy is based only on income(I may be wrong
here) so the property she has may mean nothing, but how can she afford it
since if she only pays $400 a month it means her income is only $1200 a
month(sec 8 is 1/3 your income) The only answer is that she makes money off
the books(whoring, drug selling, waitress) or that some stupid man is buying
her stuff.

[Blind Willy Reed]

Post by Avenger

Post by Michael Wise
One of my neighbors in SF lives in a house where the rent is $2.3k a
month. She pays only $300-400/month with taxpayers paying the remaining
near $2000/month in the form of Section 8 subsidies. I know this, as the
owner of the home is an acquaintance of mine and told me.
When walking by her house, I've noticed she has a 30+" plasma or LCD TV
mounted on her living room wall. I thought it a bit strange that a
person who relies on the working public to keep a roof over their head
has the means to afford a luxury entertainment system.
This week, I noticed she's now driving a brand new Humvee. It seems
crazy that a person could qualify or remain qualified for Section 8
subsidies while having the means to buy $50k+ car and other luxury items.
Does HUD really allow this sort of thing?

I doubt it but I won't definitely say no until I look up the Federal and
State requirements. SF is an expensive area so the sec 8 limits are high and
then this female may have kids and qualify for a larger place so it's
possible. I believe that the subsidy is based only on income(I may be wrong
here) so the property she has may mean nothing, but how can she afford it
since if she only pays $400 a month it means her income is only $1200 a
month(sec 8 is 1/3 your income) The only answer is that she makes money off
the books(whoring, drug selling, waitress) or that some stupid man is buying
her stuff.

"whoring, drug selling, waitress or that some stupid man is buying
her stuff." San Francisco is an equal opportunity squirrel cage.