Discussion:
Obama is making enemies out of America's friends around the world......
(too old to reply)
MioMyo
2009-05-31 14:09:48 UTC
Permalink
And yet the rallying call (never proved of course) by both the liberal media
whores and fringe leftists has been that Bush is lowering America's status
in the world.

Wonder if these same hypocrites are going to pick up on, report & deliberate
ad nauseam this little juicy tidbit?

We all know they will NOT and will instead ignore it like they do everything
else that does not comport to their ideological agenda that their messiah is
anything less than perfect!

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/nile_gardiner/blog/2009/05/29/robert_gibbs_should_apologise_to_the_british_press_for_his_sneering_rant

ROBERT GIBBS SHOULD APOLOGISE TO THE BRITISH PRESS FOR HIS SNEERING RANT

Politico has an extraordinary report on Robert Gibbs, the White House Press
Secretary, launching a furious broadside against the British press. Here are
Gibbs' sneering and condescending remarks:

"I want to speak generally about some reports I've witnessed over the past
few years in the British media," Gibbs said. "In some ways, I'm surprised it
filtered down."

"Let's just say if I wanted to look up, if I wanted to read a write-up of
how Manchester United fared last night in the Champions League Cup, I'd
might open up a British newspaper," he continued. "If I was looking for
something that bordered on truthful news, I'm not entirely sure it'd be the
first pack of clips I'd pick up."

Gibbs' juvenile comments followed an article in The Daily Telegraph relating
to the President's decision not to release new photos reportedly showing
appalling prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib by a tiny minority of military
personnel. The straightforward news piece, hotly disputed by the White
House, is based upon an interview with Major General Antonio Taguba, who
oversaw the inquiry into the Abu Ghraib abuse scandal.

For the record I firmly believe the President was right to refuse to release
the photos in the face of pressure from the ACLU, which would only further
inflame anti-American sentiment across the Muslim world. However I cannot
recall an instance like this where the President's official spokesman has
blasted the press of a key ally - in this case America's closest friend,
Great Britain.

This kind of attack would normally be made against the likes of the North
Korean or Iranian state media, but in the current climate of "engagement"
with America's enemies the White House is far more likely to attack its own
allies. Gibbs' remarks have echoes of a senior State Department official's
anti-British statements to The Sunday Telegraph after the appalling handling
of the Prime Minister's visit in March.

Can you imagine Gibbs making these remarks about The New York Times or The
Washington Post, or NBC, ABC or CBS? This would never happen. The British
press, especially the Telegraph, has been singled out because they
frequently publish articles critical of the Obama administration and are not
afraid to take on the status quo in Washington. Increasingly, millions of
Americans are turning to online UK news websites for cutting edge reports on
American politics and U.S. foreign policy that the mainstream media refuses
to cover in the States, especially if it is unflattering to the Obama White
House.

Robert Gibbs' completely unwarranted rant against the British press is an
absolute disgrace, and the President should disown his views. An unreserved
apology by Gibbs is also in order.

For all its talk of "raising America's standing" in the world after the Bush
years, the Obama administration is doing a spectacularly bad job of reaching
out to its allies. Unfortunately this is the new face of America's public
diplomacy, which will only serve to alienate public opinion across the
Atlantic. Congratulations Gibbs - you've just made an enemy out of the
entire British media, quite an achievement for the man in charge of selling
the President's message.
MioMyo
2009-05-31 15:09:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by MioMyo
And yet the rallying call (never proved of course) by both the liberal media
whores and fringe leftists has been that Bush is lowering America's status
in the world.
Wonder if these same hypocrites are going to pick up on, report & deliberate
ad nauseam this little juicy tidbit?
We all know they will NOT and will instead ignore it like they do everything
else that does not comport to their ideological agenda that their messiah is
anything less than perfect!
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/nile_gardiner/blog/2009/05/29/robert_gib...
ROBERT GIBBS SHOULD APOLOGISE TO THE BRITISH PRESS FOR HIS SNEERING RANT
Politico has an extraordinary report on Robert Gibbs, the White House Press
Secretary, launching a furious broadside against the British press. Here are
"I want to speak generally about some reports I've witnessed over the past
few years in the British media," Gibbs said. "In some ways, I'm surprised it
filtered down."
"Let's just say if I wanted to look up, if I wanted to read a write-up of
how Manchester United fared last night in the Champions League Cup, I'd
might open up a British newspaper," he continued. "If I was looking for
something that bordered on truthful news, I'm not entirely sure it'd be the
first pack of clips I'd pick up."
Gibbs' juvenile comments followed an article in The Daily Telegraph relating
to the President's decision not to release new photos reportedly showing
appalling prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib by a tiny minority of military
personnel. The straightforward news piece, hotly disputed by the White
House, is based upon an interview with Major General Antonio Taguba, who
oversaw the inquiry into the Abu Ghraib abuse scandal.
For the record I firmly believe the President was right to refuse to release
the photos in the face of pressure from the ACLU, which would only further
inflame anti-American sentiment across the Muslim world. However I cannot
recall an instance like this where the President's official spokesman has
blasted the press of a key ally - in this case America's closest friend,
Great Britain.
This kind of attack would normally be made against the likes of the North
Korean or Iranian state media, but in the current climate of "engagement"
with America's enemies the White House is far more likely to attack its own
allies. Gibbs' remarks have echoes of a senior State Department official's
anti-British statements to The Sunday Telegraph after the appalling handling
of the Prime Minister's visit in March.
Can you imagine Gibbs making these remarks about The New York Times or The
Washington Post, or NBC, ABC or CBS? This would never happen. The British
press, especially the Telegraph, has been singled out because they
frequently publish articles critical of the Obama administration and are not
afraid to take on the status quo in Washington. Increasingly, millions of
Americans are turning to online UK news websites for cutting edge reports on
American politics and U.S. foreign policy that the mainstream media refuses
to cover in the States, especially if it is unflattering to the Obama White
House.
Robert Gibbs' completely unwarranted rant against the British press is an
absolute disgrace, and the President should disown his views. An unreserved
apology by Gibbs is also in order.
For all its talk of "raising America's standing" in the world after the Bush
years, the Obama administration is doing a spectacularly bad job of reaching
out to its allies. Unfortunately this is the new face of America's public
diplomacy, which will only serve to alienate public opinion across the
Atlantic. Congratulations Gibbs - you've just made an enemy out of the
entire British media, quite an achievement for the man in charge of selling
the President's message.
<>Got nothing else to LIE about, LOL
<>Barack Obama Continues to Be Most Popular World Leader in Five Largest
<>European Countries and the U.S. May 29,2009!
<>
<>http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/?ndmViewId=news_view&newsId=20090529005066&newsLang=en


Obviously to the left, it matters what a bunch of Socialist Euros think of
America. Tell us about bamby's poll numbers here in America- are they on the
rise? how do they compare to past presidents in their first 100-days
including Bush?
Edward
2009-05-31 15:37:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by MioMyo
Post by MioMyo
And yet the rallying call (never proved of course) by both the liberal media
whores and fringe leftists has been that Bush is lowering America's status
in the world.
Wonder if these same hypocrites are going to pick up on, report & deliberate
ad nauseam this little juicy tidbit?
We all know they will NOT and will instead ignore it like they do everything
else that does not comport to their ideological agenda that their messiah is
anything less than perfect!
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/nile_gardiner/blog/2009/05/29/robert_gib...
ROBERT GIBBS SHOULD APOLOGISE TO THE BRITISH PRESS FOR HIS SNEERING RANT
Politico has an extraordinary report on Robert Gibbs, the White House Press
Secretary, launching a furious broadside against the British press. Here are
"I want to speak generally about some reports I've witnessed over the past
few years in the British media," Gibbs said. "In some ways, I'm surprised it
filtered down."
"Let's just say if I wanted to look up, if I wanted to read a write-up of
how Manchester United fared last night in the Champions League Cup, I'd
might open up a British newspaper," he continued. "If I was looking for
something that bordered on truthful news, I'm not entirely sure it'd be the
first pack of clips I'd pick up."
Gibbs' juvenile comments followed an article in The Daily Telegraph relating
to the President's decision not to release new photos reportedly showing
appalling prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib by a tiny minority of military
personnel. The straightforward news piece, hotly disputed by the White
House, is based upon an interview with Major General Antonio Taguba, who
oversaw the inquiry into the Abu Ghraib abuse scandal.
For the record I firmly believe the President was right to refuse to release
the photos in the face of pressure from the ACLU, which would only further
inflame anti-American sentiment across the Muslim world. However I cannot
recall an instance like this where the President's official spokesman has
blasted the press of a key ally - in this case America's closest friend,
Great Britain.
This kind of attack would normally be made against the likes of the North
Korean or Iranian state media, but in the current climate of
"engagement"
with America's enemies the White House is far more likely to attack its own
allies. Gibbs' remarks have echoes of a senior State Department official's
anti-British statements to The Sunday Telegraph after the appalling handling
of the Prime Minister's visit in March.
Can you imagine Gibbs making these remarks about The New York Times or The
Washington Post, or NBC, ABC or CBS? This would never happen. The British
press, especially the Telegraph, has been singled out because they
frequently publish articles critical of the Obama administration and are not
afraid to take on the status quo in Washington. Increasingly, millions of
Americans are turning to online UK news websites for cutting edge reports on
American politics and U.S. foreign policy that the mainstream media refuses
to cover in the States, especially if it is unflattering to the Obama White
House.
Robert Gibbs' completely unwarranted rant against the British press is an
absolute disgrace, and the President should disown his views. An unreserved
apology by Gibbs is also in order.
For all its talk of "raising America's standing" in the world after the Bush
years, the Obama administration is doing a spectacularly bad job of reaching
out to its allies. Unfortunately this is the new face of America's public
diplomacy, which will only serve to alienate public opinion across the
Atlantic. Congratulations Gibbs - you've just made an enemy out of the
entire British media, quite an achievement for the man in charge of selling
the President's message.
<>Got nothing else to LIE about, LOL
<>Barack Obama Continues to Be Most Popular World Leader in Five Largest
<>European Countries and the U.S. May 29,2009!
<>
<>http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/?ndmViewId=news_view&newsId=20090529005066&newsLang=en
Obviously to the left, it matters what a bunch of Socialist Euros think
of America. Tell us about bamby's poll numbers here in America- are they
on the rise? how do they compare to past presidents in their first
100-days including Bush?
Approval rating at the end of the first 100 days:
Obama - 61%
Bush jr. - 56%
Clinton - 52%
The poll was conducted by a Republican and a Democrat.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30454232/
kujebak
2009-05-31 19:09:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Edward
Post by MioMyo
And yet the rallying call (never proved of course) by both the liberal  
media
whores and fringe leftists has been that Bush is lowering America's  
status
in the world.
Wonder if these same hypocrites are going to pick up on, report &  
deliberate
ad nauseam this little juicy tidbit?
We all know they will NOT and will instead ignore it like they do  
everything
else that does not comport to their ideological agenda that their  
messiah is
anything less than perfect!
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/nile_gardiner/blog/2009/05/29/robert_gib...
ROBERT GIBBS SHOULD APOLOGISE TO THE BRITISH PRESS FOR HIS SNEERING RANT
Politico has an extraordinary report on Robert Gibbs, the White House  
Press
Secretary, launching a furious broadside against the British press.  
Here are
"I want to speak generally about some reports I've witnessed over the  
past
few years in the British media," Gibbs said. "In some ways, I'm  
surprised it
filtered down."
"Let's just say if I wanted to look up, if I wanted to read a write-up  
of
how Manchester United fared last night in the Champions League Cup, I'd
might open up a British newspaper," he continued. "If I was looking for
something that bordered on truthful news, I'm not entirely sure it'd be  
the
first pack of clips I'd pick up."
Gibbs' juvenile comments followed an article in The Daily Telegraph  
relating
to the President's decision not to release new photos reportedly showing
appalling prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib by a tiny minority of military
personnel. The straightforward news piece, hotly disputed by the White
House, is based upon an interview with Major General Antonio Taguba, who
oversaw the inquiry into the Abu Ghraib abuse scandal.
For the record I firmly believe the President was right to refuse to  
release
the photos in the face of pressure from the ACLU, which would only  
further
inflame anti-American sentiment across the Muslim world. However I  
cannot
recall an instance like this where the President's official spokesman  
has
blasted the press of a key ally - in this case America's closest friend,
Great Britain.
This kind of attack would normally be made against the likes of the  
North
Korean or Iranian state media, but in the current climate of  
"engagement"
with America's enemies the White House is far more likely to attack its  
own
allies. Gibbs' remarks have echoes of a senior State Department  
official's
anti-British statements to The Sunday Telegraph after the appalling  
handling
of the Prime Minister's visit in March.
Can you imagine Gibbs making these remarks about The New York Times or  
The
Washington Post, or NBC, ABC or CBS? This would never happen. The  
British
press, especially the Telegraph, has been singled out because they
frequently publish articles critical of the Obama administration and  
are not
afraid to take on the status quo in Washington. Increasingly, millions  
of
Americans are turning to online UK news websites for cutting edge  
reports on
American politics and U.S. foreign policy that the mainstream media  
refuses
to cover in the States, especially if it is unflattering to the Obama  
White
House.
Robert Gibbs' completely unwarranted rant against the British press is  
an
absolute disgrace, and the President should disown his views. An  
unreserved
apology by Gibbs is also in order.
For all its talk of "raising America's standing" in the world after the  
Bush
years, the Obama administration is doing a spectacularly bad job of  
reaching
out to its allies. Unfortunately this is the new face of America's  
public
diplomacy, which will only serve to alienate public opinion across the
Atlantic. Congratulations Gibbs - you've just made an enemy out of the
entire British media, quite an achievement for the man in charge of  
selling
the President's message.
<>Got nothing else to LIE about, LOL
<>Barack Obama Continues to Be Most Popular World Leader in Five Largest
<>European Countries and the U.S. May 29,2009!
<>
<>http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/?ndmViewId=news_view&n...
Obviously to the left, it matters what a bunch of Socialist Euros think  
of America. Tell us about bamby's poll numbers here in America- are they  
on the rise? how do they compare to past presidents in their first  
100-days including Bush?
Obama - 61%
Bush jr. - 56%
Clinton - 52%
The poll was conducted by a Republican and a Democrat.http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30454232/- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
As has been stated elsewhere, presidential popularity
comparisons are meaningless, because there are no
controlling standards. I have never seen any polling
results published alongside the actual questions that
were asked. Besides, where could they possibly have
found a Republican at NBC?
MioMyo
2009-05-31 20:21:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Edward
Post by MioMyo
Obviously to the left, it matters what a bunch of Socialist Euros think
of America. Tell us about bamby's poll numbers here in America- are they
on the rise? how do they compare to past presidents in their first
100-days including Bush?
Obama - 61%
Bush jr. - 56%
Clinton - 52%
The poll was conducted by a Republican and a
Democrat.http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30454232/- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
<>As has been stated elsewhere, presidential popularity
<>comparisons are meaningless, because there are no
<>controlling standards. I have never seen any polling
<>results published alongside the actual questions that
<>were asked. Besides, where could they possibly have
<>found a Republican at NBC?

That's easy, Matthews and Olbermann have Republican dart boards in both
their break and green rooms.
Behead the GOP Snake
2009-05-31 20:27:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by MioMyo
Post by Edward
Post by MioMyo
Obviously to the left, it matters what a bunch of Socialist Euros think
of America. Tell us about bamby's poll numbers here in America- are they
on the rise? how do they compare to past presidents in their first
100-days including Bush?
Obama - 61%
Bush jr. - 56%
Clinton - 52%
The poll was conducted by a Republican and a
Democrat.http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30454232/- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
<>As has been stated elsewhere, presidential popularity
<>comparisons are meaningless, because there are no
<>controlling standards. I have never seen any polling
<>results published alongside the actual questions that
<>were asked. Besides, where could they possibly have
<>found a Republican at NBC?
That's easy, Matthews and Olbermann have Republican dart boards in both
their break and green rooms.
I suggest the have loaded .45 Thompsons as well.
MioMyo
2009-05-31 22:08:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Behead the GOP Snake
Post by MioMyo
Post by Edward
Post by MioMyo
Obviously to the left, it matters what a bunch of Socialist Euros think
of America. Tell us about bamby's poll numbers here in America- are they
on the rise? how do they compare to past presidents in their first
100-days including Bush?
Obama - 61%
Bush jr. - 56%
Clinton - 52%
The poll was conducted by a Republican and a
Democrat.http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30454232/- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
<>As has been stated elsewhere, presidential popularity
<>comparisons are meaningless, because there are no
<>controlling standards. I have never seen any polling
<>results published alongside the actual questions that
<>were asked. Besides, where could they possibly have
<>found a Republican at NBC?
That's easy, Matthews and Olbermann have Republican dart boards in both
their break and green rooms.
I suggest the have loaded .45 Thompsons as well.
Please don't hold back, libtard. Do you think any Republicans, whoever,
wherever have earned the right to continue living?
Bob Eld
2009-06-01 00:49:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by MioMyo
Post by Behead the GOP Snake
Post by MioMyo
Post by Edward
Post by MioMyo
Obviously to the left, it matters what a bunch of Socialist Euros think
of America. Tell us about bamby's poll numbers here in America- are they
on the rise? how do they compare to past presidents in their first
100-days including Bush?
Obama - 61%
Bush jr. - 56%
Clinton - 52%
The poll was conducted by a Republican and a
Democrat.http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30454232/- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
<>As has been stated elsewhere, presidential popularity
<>comparisons are meaningless, because there are no
<>controlling standards. I have never seen any polling
<>results published alongside the actual questions that
<>were asked. Besides, where could they possibly have
<>found a Republican at NBC?
That's easy, Matthews and Olbermann have Republican dart boards in both
their break and green rooms.
I suggest the have loaded .45 Thompsons as well.
Please don't hold back, libtard. Do you think any Republicans, whoever,
wherever have earned the right to continue living?
Republicans are taking care of their own what with Limbaugh, Hannity and
other rightards at the helm. Twenty one percent and falling! There's nothing
we Dems need to do. The circular firing squad is doing it for us. Ain't it a
hoot?
MioMyo
2009-06-01 01:48:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob Eld
Post by MioMyo
Post by Behead the GOP Snake
Post by MioMyo
On Sun, 31 May 2009 11:09:15 -0400, MioMyo
Post by MioMyo
Obviously to the left, it matters what a bunch of Socialist Euros think
of America. Tell us about bamby's poll numbers here in America- are they
on the rise? how do they compare to past presidents in their first
100-days including Bush?
Obama - 61%
Bush jr. - 56%
Clinton - 52%
The poll was conducted by a Republican and a
Democrat.http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30454232/- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
<>As has been stated elsewhere, presidential popularity
<>comparisons are meaningless, because there are no
<>controlling standards. I have never seen any polling
<>results published alongside the actual questions that
<>were asked. Besides, where could they possibly have
<>found a Republican at NBC?
That's easy, Matthews and Olbermann have Republican dart boards in both
their break and green rooms.
I suggest the have loaded .45 Thompsons as well.
Please don't hold back, libtard. Do you think any Republicans, whoever,
wherever have earned the right to continue living?
Republicans are taking care of their own what with Limbaugh, Hannity and
other rightards at the helm.
Rush and Sean are the head of the party? Says who? And before coming unglued
and making a fool of yourself, we both know this is the current strawman
being promoted by the left.......
Post by Bob Eld
Twenty one percent and falling!
Where'd that figure come from besides your ass. after all the election was
47% to 53% which means the nation is divided pretty much down the center,
tard,,,, So do give me some daily-kos or move-on cite for a really good
laugh.......
Post by Bob Eld
There's nothing
we Dems need to do. The circular firing squad is doing it for us. Ain't it a
hoot?
2010 will tell that story......
Bob Eld
2009-06-01 14:31:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by MioMyo
Post by Bob Eld
Post by MioMyo
Post by Behead the GOP Snake
Post by MioMyo
On Sun, 31 May 2009 11:09:15 -0400, MioMyo
Post by MioMyo
Obviously to the left, it matters what a bunch of Socialist Euros think
of America. Tell us about bamby's poll numbers here in America-
are
Post by MioMyo
Post by Bob Eld
Post by MioMyo
Post by Behead the GOP Snake
Post by MioMyo
Post by MioMyo
they
on the rise? how do they compare to past presidents in their first
100-days including Bush?
Obama - 61%
Bush jr. - 56%
Clinton - 52%
The poll was conducted by a Republican and a
Democrat.http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30454232/- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
<>As has been stated elsewhere, presidential popularity
<>comparisons are meaningless, because there are no
<>controlling standards. I have never seen any polling
<>results published alongside the actual questions that
<>were asked. Besides, where could they possibly have
<>found a Republican at NBC?
That's easy, Matthews and Olbermann have Republican dart boards in both
their break and green rooms.
I suggest the have loaded .45 Thompsons as well.
Please don't hold back, libtard. Do you think any Republicans, whoever,
wherever have earned the right to continue living?
Republicans are taking care of their own what with Limbaugh, Hannity and
other rightards at the helm.
Rush and Sean are the head of the party? Says who? And before coming unglued
and making a fool of yourself, we both know this is the current strawman
being promoted by the left.......
Post by Bob Eld
Twenty one percent and falling!
Where'd that figure come from besides your ass. after all the election was
47% to 53% which means the nation is divided pretty much down the center,
tard,,,, So do give me some daily-kos or move-on cite for a really good
laugh.......
Post by Bob Eld
There's nothing
we Dems need to do. The circular firing squad is doing it for us. Ain't
it
Post by MioMyo
Post by Bob Eld
a
hoot?
2010 will tell that story......
Yep, 2010 will tell that story. But I guess you are not up on the latest
news and demographics. Oh well, stupid is as stupid does!
MioMyo
2009-06-02 01:32:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob Eld
Post by MioMyo
Where'd that figure come from besides your ass. after all the election
was
Post by MioMyo
47% to 53% which means the nation is divided pretty much down the center,
tard,,,, So do give me some daily-kos or move-on cite for a really good
laugh.......
Post by Bob Eld
There's nothing
we Dems need to do. The circular firing squad is doing it for us. Ain't
it
Post by MioMyo
Post by Bob Eld
a
hoot?
2010 will tell that story......
Yep, 2010 will tell that story. But I guess you are not up on the latest
news and demographics. Oh well, stupid is as stupid does!
You're right in that I don't keep up on either the Huffington Post or the
Daily Kos. Ill leave that to the stupid does folks...
MioMyo
2009-05-31 20:12:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Edward
Post by MioMyo
Post by MioMyo
And yet the rallying call (never proved of course) by both the liberal media
whores and fringe leftists has been that Bush is lowering America's status
in the world.
Wonder if these same hypocrites are going to pick up on, report & deliberate
ad nauseam this little juicy tidbit?
We all know they will NOT and will instead ignore it like they do everything
else that does not comport to their ideological agenda that their messiah is
anything less than perfect!
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/nile_gardiner/blog/2009/05/29/robert_gib...
ROBERT GIBBS SHOULD APOLOGISE TO THE BRITISH PRESS FOR HIS SNEERING RANT
Politico has an extraordinary report on Robert Gibbs, the White House Press
Secretary, launching a furious broadside against the British press. Here are
"I want to speak generally about some reports I've witnessed over the past
few years in the British media," Gibbs said. "In some ways, I'm surprised it
filtered down."
"Let's just say if I wanted to look up, if I wanted to read a write-up of
how Manchester United fared last night in the Champions League Cup, I'd
might open up a British newspaper," he continued. "If I was looking for
something that bordered on truthful news, I'm not entirely sure it'd be the
first pack of clips I'd pick up."
Gibbs' juvenile comments followed an article in The Daily Telegraph relating
to the President's decision not to release new photos reportedly showing
appalling prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib by a tiny minority of military
personnel. The straightforward news piece, hotly disputed by the White
House, is based upon an interview with Major General Antonio Taguba, who
oversaw the inquiry into the Abu Ghraib abuse scandal.
For the record I firmly believe the President was right to refuse to release
the photos in the face of pressure from the ACLU, which would only further
inflame anti-American sentiment across the Muslim world. However I cannot
recall an instance like this where the President's official spokesman has
blasted the press of a key ally - in this case America's closest friend,
Great Britain.
This kind of attack would normally be made against the likes of the North
Korean or Iranian state media, but in the current climate of "engagement"
with America's enemies the White House is far more likely to attack its own
allies. Gibbs' remarks have echoes of a senior State Department official's
anti-British statements to The Sunday Telegraph after the appalling handling
of the Prime Minister's visit in March.
Can you imagine Gibbs making these remarks about The New York Times or The
Washington Post, or NBC, ABC or CBS? This would never happen. The British
press, especially the Telegraph, has been singled out because they
frequently publish articles critical of the Obama administration and are not
afraid to take on the status quo in Washington. Increasingly, millions of
Americans are turning to online UK news websites for cutting edge reports on
American politics and U.S. foreign policy that the mainstream media refuses
to cover in the States, especially if it is unflattering to the Obama White
House.
Robert Gibbs' completely unwarranted rant against the British press is an
absolute disgrace, and the President should disown his views. An unreserved
apology by Gibbs is also in order.
For all its talk of "raising America's standing" in the world after the Bush
years, the Obama administration is doing a spectacularly bad job of reaching
out to its allies. Unfortunately this is the new face of America's public
diplomacy, which will only serve to alienate public opinion across the
Atlantic. Congratulations Gibbs - you've just made an enemy out of the
entire British media, quite an achievement for the man in charge of selling
the President's message.
<>Got nothing else to LIE about, LOL
<>Barack Obama Continues to Be Most Popular World Leader in Five Largest
<>European Countries and the U.S. May 29,2009!
<>
<>http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/?ndmViewId=news_view&n...
Obviously to the left, it matters what a bunch of Socialist Euros think
of America. Tell us about bamby's poll numbers here in America- are they
on the rise? how do they compare to past presidents in their first
100-days including Bush?
Obama - 61%
Bush jr. - 56%
Clinton - 52%
The poll was conducted by a Republican and a
Democrat.http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30454232/
<>And of course, it turns out the article in the Telegraph was false,
<>made up, deserving of ridicule. Just like MeeeOhhhhMyyyOhhhh/

Really, if it is were you going to show or cite proof it's false, or are you
merely going to attack anyone who challenges you to do so, as usual?
Behead the GOP Snake
2009-06-01 08:51:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by MioMyo
Post by Edward
Post by MioMyo
Post by MioMyo
And yet the rallying call (never proved of course) by both the liberal media
whores and fringe leftists has been that Bush is lowering America's status
in the world.
Wonder if these same hypocrites are going to pick up on, report & deliberate
ad nauseam this little juicy tidbit?
We all know they will NOT and will instead ignore it like they do everything
else that does not comport to their ideological agenda that their messiah is
anything less than perfect!
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/nile_gardiner/blog/2009/05/29/robert_gib...
ROBERT GIBBS SHOULD APOLOGISE TO THE BRITISH PRESS FOR HIS SNEERING RANT
Politico has an extraordinary report on Robert Gibbs, the White House Press
Secretary, launching a furious broadside against the British press. Here are
"I want to speak generally about some reports I've witnessed over the past
few years in the British media," Gibbs said. "In some ways, I'm surprised it
filtered down."
"Let's just say if I wanted to look up, if I wanted to read a write-up of
how Manchester United fared last night in the Champions League Cup, I'd
might open up a British newspaper," he continued. "If I was looking for
something that bordered on truthful news, I'm not entirely sure it'd
be
the
first pack of clips I'd pick up."
Gibbs' juvenile comments followed an article in The Daily Telegraph relating
to the President's decision not to release new photos reportedly showing
appalling prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib by a tiny minority of military
personnel. The straightforward news piece, hotly disputed by the White
House, is based upon an interview with Major General Antonio Taguba, who
oversaw the inquiry into the Abu Ghraib abuse scandal.
For the record I firmly believe the President was right to refuse to release
the photos in the face of pressure from the ACLU, which would only further
inflame anti-American sentiment across the Muslim world. However I cannot
recall an instance like this where the President's official spokesman has
blasted the press of a key ally - in this case America's closest friend,
Great Britain.
This kind of attack would normally be made against the likes of the North
Korean or Iranian state media, but in the current climate of "engagement"
with America's enemies the White House is far more likely to attack
its
own
allies. Gibbs' remarks have echoes of a senior State Department official's
anti-British statements to The Sunday Telegraph after the appalling handling
of the Prime Minister's visit in March.
Can you imagine Gibbs making these remarks about The New York Times or The
Washington Post, or NBC, ABC or CBS? This would never happen. The British
press, especially the Telegraph, has been singled out because they
frequently publish articles critical of the Obama administration and are not
afraid to take on the status quo in Washington. Increasingly, millions of
Americans are turning to online UK news websites for cutting edge reports on
American politics and U.S. foreign policy that the mainstream media refuses
to cover in the States, especially if it is unflattering to the Obama White
House.
Robert Gibbs' completely unwarranted rant against the British press is an
absolute disgrace, and the President should disown his views. An unreserved
apology by Gibbs is also in order.
For all its talk of "raising America's standing" in the world after
the
Bush
years, the Obama administration is doing a spectacularly bad job of reaching
out to its allies. Unfortunately this is the new face of America's public
diplomacy, which will only serve to alienate public opinion across the
Atlantic. Congratulations Gibbs - you've just made an enemy out of the
entire British media, quite an achievement for the man in charge of selling
the President's message.
<>Got nothing else to LIE about, LOL
<>Barack Obama Continues to Be Most Popular World Leader in Five Largest
<>European Countries and the U.S. May 29,2009!
<>
<>http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/?ndmViewId=news_view&n...
Obviously to the left, it matters what a bunch of Socialist Euros think
of America. Tell us about bamby's poll numbers here in America- are they
on the rise? how do they compare to past presidents in their first
100-days including Bush?
Obama - 61%
Bush jr. - 56%
Clinton - 52%
The poll was conducted by a Republican and a
Democrat.http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30454232/
<>And of course, it turns out the article in the Telegraph was false,
<>made up, deserving of ridicule. Just like MeeeOhhhhMyyyOhhhh/
Really, if it is were you going to show or cite proof it's false, or are
you merely going to attack anyone who challenges you to do so, as usual?
Matthew Bennell: [dials his phone] I'll get the police.
Telephone Operator: Police.
Matthew Bennell: Officer, I'd like to report four bodies in my backyard.
Telephone Operator: Wait right there Mr. Bennel.
Matthew Bennell: How do you know my name?
Jack Bellicec: [Jack's eyes widen with fear] Hang up, Matthew.
Matthew Bennell: [into the phone] I didn't tell you my name.
Jack Bellicec: Hang up!
Matthew Bennell: [hangs up the phone] I didn't tell them my name!
Nancy Bellicec: That's because they're all pugs. They're all pugs, all of
them!
Adam Whyte-Settlar
2009-06-01 09:06:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by Edward
Post by MioMyo
Post by MioMyo
And yet the rallying call (never proved of course) by both the liberal media
whores and fringe leftists has been that Bush is lowering America's status
in the world.
Of course he has you ignorant parochial cunt. Have you even been anywhere
outside Hicksville in your miserable useless hae-filled life.
Post by Edward
Post by MioMyo
Obviously to the left, it matters what a bunch of Socialist Euros think
of America.
LOL - 'socialists' LOL. You don't even know the meaning of the word you
retarded evil fuck.
By the way - he's rightly held in utter contempt in Australia and New
Zealand as well.
Oh - and in China last time I was there.
Post by Edward
Post by MioMyo
Tell us about bamby's poll numbers here in America- are they on the rise?
how do they compare to past presidents in their first 100-days including
Bush?
Obama - 61%
Bush jr. - 56%
The nightmare years are over - all that remains is a decade of cleaning up
all the shit they left.
MioMyo
2009-06-02 01:43:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam Whyte-Settlar
Post by Edward
Post by MioMyo
Post by MioMyo
And yet the rallying call (never proved of course) by both the liberal media
whores and fringe leftists has been that Bush is lowering America's status
in the world.
Of course he has you ignorant parochial cunt. Have you even been anywhere
outside Hicksville in your miserable useless hae-filled life.
Post by Edward
Post by MioMyo
Obviously to the left, it matters what a bunch of Socialist Euros think
of America.
LOL - 'socialists' LOL. You don't even know the meaning of the word you
retarded evil fuck.
By the way - he's rightly held in utter contempt in Australia and New
Zealand as well.
Oh - and in China last time I was there.
Post by Edward
Post by MioMyo
Tell us about bamby's poll numbers here in America- are they on the
rise? how do they compare to past presidents in their first 100-days
including Bush?
Obama - 61%
Bush jr. - 56%
The nightmare years are over - all that remains is a decade of cleaning up
all the shit they left.
So you think your anecdotal experiences are representative of world opinion-
figures. It's no wonder you intolerant, arrogant assholes on the fringe left
hold everyone who doesn't agree with your ideological fascist utopia in
utter contempt. I not surprised you believe, without anything other than
your own collective narcissistic opinions, those others are beneath your
self-anointed highnesses......
MioMyo
2009-05-31 20:17:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by MioMyo
Post by MioMyo
And yet the rallying call (never proved of course) by both the liberal media
whores and fringe leftists has been that Bush is lowering America's status
in the world.
Wonder if these same hypocrites are going to pick up on, report & deliberate
ad nauseam this little juicy tidbit?
We all know they will NOT and will instead ignore it like they do everything
else that does not comport to their ideological agenda that their
messiah
is
anything less than perfect!
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/nile_gardiner/blog/2009/05/29/robert_gib...
ROBERT GIBBS SHOULD APOLOGISE TO THE BRITISH PRESS FOR HIS SNEERING RANT
Politico has an extraordinary report on Robert Gibbs, the White House Press
Secretary, launching a furious broadside against the British press. Here are
"I want to speak generally about some reports I've witnessed over the past
few years in the British media," Gibbs said. "In some ways, I'm
surprised
it
filtered down."
"Let's just say if I wanted to look up, if I wanted to read a write-up of
how Manchester United fared last night in the Champions League Cup, I'd
might open up a British newspaper," he continued. "If I was looking for
something that bordered on truthful news, I'm not entirely sure it'd be the
first pack of clips I'd pick up."
Gibbs' juvenile comments followed an article in The Daily Telegraph relating
to the President's decision not to release new photos reportedly showing
appalling prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib by a tiny minority of military
personnel. The straightforward news piece, hotly disputed by the White
House, is based upon an interview with Major General Antonio Taguba, who
oversaw the inquiry into the Abu Ghraib abuse scandal.
For the record I firmly believe the President was right to refuse to release
the photos in the face of pressure from the ACLU, which would only further
inflame anti-American sentiment across the Muslim world. However I cannot
recall an instance like this where the President's official spokesman has
blasted the press of a key ally - in this case America's closest friend,
Great Britain.
This kind of attack would normally be made against the likes of the North
Korean or Iranian state media, but in the current climate of
"engagement"
with America's enemies the White House is far more likely to attack its own
allies. Gibbs' remarks have echoes of a senior State Department official's
anti-British statements to The Sunday Telegraph after the appalling handling
of the Prime Minister's visit in March.
Can you imagine Gibbs making these remarks about The New York Times or The
Washington Post, or NBC, ABC or CBS? This would never happen. The British
press, especially the Telegraph, has been singled out because they
frequently publish articles critical of the Obama administration and are not
afraid to take on the status quo in Washington. Increasingly, millions of
Americans are turning to online UK news websites for cutting edge
reports
on
American politics and U.S. foreign policy that the mainstream media refuses
to cover in the States, especially if it is unflattering to the Obama White
House.
Robert Gibbs' completely unwarranted rant against the British press is an
absolute disgrace, and the President should disown his views. An unreserved
apology by Gibbs is also in order.
For all its talk of "raising America's standing" in the world after the Bush
years, the Obama administration is doing a spectacularly bad job of reaching
out to its allies. Unfortunately this is the new face of America's public
diplomacy, which will only serve to alienate public opinion across the
Atlantic. Congratulations Gibbs - you've just made an enemy out of the
entire British media, quite an achievement for the man in charge of selling
the President's message.
<>Got nothing else to LIE about, LOL
<>Barack Obama Continues to Be Most Popular World Leader in Five Largest
<>European Countries and the U.S. May 29,2009!
<>
<>http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/?ndmViewId=news_view&n...
Obviously to the left, it matters what a bunch of Socialist Euros think of
America. Tell us about bamby's poll numbers here in America- are they on the
rise? how do they compare to past presidents in their first 100-days
including Bush?
<>And to shitass rightards, who don't know England is in Europe, and his
<>poll numbers here are just fine. Caught LYING again LOL


Being just fine is not the same as going down....

So it looks like it you, libtard who got caught trying to spin a lie......
RichTravsky
2009-06-04 03:49:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by MioMyo
And yet the rallying call (never proved of course) by both the liberal media
whores and fringe leftists has been that Bush is lowering America's status
in the world.
Wonder if these same hypocrites are going to pick up on, report & deliberate
ad nauseam this little juicy tidbit?
We all know they will NOT and will instead ignore it like they do everything
else that does not comport to their ideological agenda that their messiah is
anything less than perfect!
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/nile_gardiner/blog/2009/05/29/robert_gibbs_should_apologise_to_the_british_press_for_his_sneering_rant
ROBERT GIBBS SHOULD APOLOGISE TO THE BRITISH PRESS FOR HIS SNEERING RANT
That's it? That's all you can come up with? After years of the TexASS hick
damaging America's image?

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA

Loading...