Discussion:
A brief history lesson for Loopy the Illiterate
(too old to reply)
Stan de SD
2006-10-24 16:06:41 UTC
Permalink
The Facts are Stanley that in over a Thousand years these people
had to move North and to Say the United States was Free for the Taking
is Very Wrong in Itself if you do have any Credible Information Stanley
the Perv your Lies and Misinformation Cancel most of the Trash you Post
because one Lie and you Loose All Credibility on Everything Else you
Write.
The facts are that you are ignorant, illitertate, and totally incapable of
addressing the points I presented. Here, I will repost them for you:

1) The land wasn't stolen from Mexico - it was purchased.
(2) Land wasn't confiscated from individual Mexicans - property rights were
honored to the best of the Americans to figure out the Spanish/Mexican land
grant titles.
(3) There was no forcible expulsion of Mexicans, who were allowed to remain
and become US citizens.
(4) Virtually none of the illegal Mexicans coming to the US have any
personal or family ties with any Mexican citizens who may have lived in
those areas in question before they became part of the US.
Steven
2006-10-24 16:56:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Stan de SD
The Facts are Stanley that in over a Thousand years these people
had to move North and to Say the United States was Free for the Taking
is Very Wrong in Itself if you do have any Credible Information Stanley
the Perv your Lies and Misinformation Cancel most of the Trash you Post
because one Lie and you Loose All Credibility on Everything Else you
Write.
The facts are that you are ignorant, illitertate, and totally incapable of
1) The land wasn't stolen from Mexico - it was purchased.
(2) Land wasn't confiscated from individual Mexicans - property rights were
honored to the best of the Americans to figure out the Spanish/Mexican land
grant titles.
(3) There was no forcible expulsion of Mexicans, who were allowed to remain
and become US citizens.
(4) Virtually none of the illegal Mexicans coming to the US have any
personal or family ties with any Mexican citizens who may have lived in
those areas in question before they became part of the US.
99.99% DNA match between all of us. No, I ain't no wishy-washy humanist
or whatever.

Quit jamming 38 groups in the send line somebody? If you need to send
to more than 5 groups at a time you are either lazy or hopelessly
desparate.
Jafo
2006-10-24 19:34:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Steven
Lupe Esquibel wrote...
The Facts are Stanley that in over a Thousand years these people
had to move North and to Say the United States was Free for the
Taking is Very Wrong in Itself if you do have any Credible
Information Stanley the Perv your Lies and Misinformation Cancel
most of the Trash you Post because one Lie and you Loose All
Credibility on Everything Else you Write.
The facts are that you are ignorant, illitertate, and totally
incapable of addressing the points I presented. Here, I will repost
(1) The land wasn't stolen from Mexico - it was purchased.
(2) Land wasn't confiscated from individual Mexicans - property
rights were honored to the best of the Americans to figure out the
Spanish/Mexican land grant titles.
(3) There was no forcible expulsion of Mexicans, who were allowed
to remain and become US citizens.
(4) Virtually none of the illegal Mexicans coming to the US have
any personal or family ties with any Mexican citizens who may have
lived in those areas in question before they became part of the US.
99.99% DNA match between all of us. No, I ain't no wishy-washy
humanist or whatever.
Right. In the final analysis, we're all from the same genetic
source. So?
Post by Steven
Quit jamming 38 groups in the send line somebody? If you need to
send to more than 5 groups at a time you are either lazy or
hopelessly desparate.
He'd posted to ten, and there are several different reasons for it.
The subject matter has relevance to nearly all of the groups. And
when replying to a post in the thread, a writer want to make sure
that the original author can read it, so you leave the Newsgroups
line alone. There are very few authors who tell you up front just
which of the crossposted groups they're reading, and I'm one of them.
See the opening line of almost any of my posts.

Which group are *you* reading, Steven?

--
Jafo
Steven
2006-10-24 19:57:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jafo
Post by Steven
Lupe Esquibel wrote...
The Facts are Stanley that in over a Thousand years these people
had to move North and to Say the United States was Free for the
Taking is Very Wrong in Itself if you do have any Credible
Information Stanley the Perv your Lies and Misinformation Cancel
most of the Trash you Post because one Lie and you Loose All
Credibility on Everything Else you Write.
The facts are that you are ignorant, illitertate, and totally
incapable of addressing the points I presented. Here, I will repost
(1) The land wasn't stolen from Mexico - it was purchased.
(2) Land wasn't confiscated from individual Mexicans - property
rights were honored to the best of the Americans to figure out the
Spanish/Mexican land grant titles.
(3) There was no forcible expulsion of Mexicans, who were allowed
to remain and become US citizens.
(4) Virtually none of the illegal Mexicans coming to the US have
any personal or family ties with any Mexican citizens who may have
lived in those areas in question before they became part of the US.
99.99% DNA match between all of us. No, I ain't no wishy-washy
humanist or whatever.
Right. In the final analysis, we're all from the same genetic
source. So?
Post by Steven
Quit jamming 38 groups in the send line somebody? If you need to
send to more than 5 groups at a time you are either lazy or
hopelessly desparate.
He'd posted to ten, and there are several different reasons for it.
The subject matter has relevance to nearly all of the groups. And
when replying to a post in the thread, a writer want to make sure
that the original author can read it, so you leave the Newsgroups
line alone. There are very few authors who tell you up front just
which of the crossposted groups they're reading, and I'm one of them.
See the opening line of almost any of my posts.
Which group are *you* reading, Steven?
Google. You can't post to more than five here. Some of them are from
outer space, so they get the MEAT CLEAVER.
AIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII!
Jafo
2006-10-24 21:33:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by Steven
Post by Jafo
Post by Steven
Quit jamming 38 groups in the send line somebody? If you need to
send to more than 5 groups at a time you are either lazy or
hopelessly desparate.
He'd posted to ten, and there are several different reasons for it.
The subject matter has relevance to nearly all of the groups. And
when replying to a post in the thread, a writer want to make sure
that the original author can read it, so you leave the Newsgroups
line alone. There are very few authors who tell you up front just
which of the crossposted groups they're reading, and I'm one of them.
See the opening line of almost any of my posts.
Which group are *you* reading, Steven?
Google. You can't post to more than five here. Some of them are from
outer space, so they get the MEAT CLEAVER.
AIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII!
No, Google isn't a newsgroup, it's merely an online browser-based
newsreader with access to the newsgroups and with its own posting
rules. Which group are you subscribed to? From which group are you
reading this post?

And what's with the cutesy Followup-To: alt.test, alt.testing, and
alt.who.goes.there?

--
Jafo
Steven
2006-10-25 01:00:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jafo
Post by Steven
Post by Jafo
Post by Steven
Quit jamming 38 groups in the send line somebody? If you need to
send to more than 5 groups at a time you are either lazy or
hopelessly desparate.
He'd posted to ten, and there are several different reasons for it.
The subject matter has relevance to nearly all of the groups. And
when replying to a post in the thread, a writer want to make sure
that the original author can read it, so you leave the Newsgroups
line alone. There are very few authors who tell you up front just
which of the crossposted groups they're reading, and I'm one of them.
See the opening line of almost any of my posts.
Which group are *you* reading, Steven?
Google. You can't post to more than five here. Some of them are from
outer space, so they get the MEAT CLEAVER.
AIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII!
No, Google isn't a newsgroup, it's merely an online browser-based
newsreader with access to the newsgroups and with its own posting
rules. Which group are you subscribed to? From which group are you
reading this post?
And what's with the cutesy Followup-To: alt.test, alt.testing, and
alt.who.goes.there?
--
Jafo
Who the fuck are you, Homeland Security? Jackass fuck off, like you
spell it. You're more than nosy.

I'm not an immigrant, so quit thinking you're on to some stupid thing.
Stan de SD
2006-10-25 19:00:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by Steven
Post by Jafo
Post by Steven
Post by Jafo
Post by Steven
Quit jamming 38 groups in the send line somebody? If you need to
send to more than 5 groups at a time you are either lazy or
hopelessly desparate.
He'd posted to ten, and there are several different reasons for it.
The subject matter has relevance to nearly all of the groups. And
when replying to a post in the thread, a writer want to make sure
that the original author can read it, so you leave the Newsgroups
line alone. There are very few authors who tell you up front just
which of the crossposted groups they're reading, and I'm one of them.
See the opening line of almost any of my posts.
Which group are *you* reading, Steven?
Google. You can't post to more than five here. Some of them are from
outer space, so they get the MEAT CLEAVER.
AIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII!
No, Google isn't a newsgroup, it's merely an online browser-based
newsreader with access to the newsgroups and with its own posting
rules. Which group are you subscribed to? From which group are you
reading this post?
And what's with the cutesy Followup-To: alt.test, alt.testing, and
alt.who.goes.there?
--
Jafo
Who the fuck are you, Homeland Security? Jackass fuck off, like you
spell it. You're more than nosy.
What's gotten into you, Stevie-o - a bad batch of crank? Taking time from
your Zippy Pinheadesque ramblings to engage in a round of net-nanny-naziism?
Tim Crowley
2006-10-25 19:06:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Stan de SD
What's gotten into you, Stevie-o - a bad batch of crank? Taking time from
your Zippy Pinheadesque ramblings to engage in a round of net-nanny-naziism?
yet again, Usenet is amazed by the logic, by the amazing debate skills.
Stan, you do such a great job of explaining your views. WOW!!!!!!
Steven
2006-10-26 05:44:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tim Crowley
Post by Stan de SD
What's gotten into you, Stevie-o - a bad batch of crank? Taking time from
your Zippy Pinheadesque ramblings to engage in a round of net-nanny-naziism?
yet again, Usenet is amazed by the logic, by the amazing debate skills.
Stan, you do such a great job of explaining your views. WOW!!!!!!
My crank is a Redline and racing stock. It adds a new dimension of
solidness and power that makes my Western Flyer fly over the Western
side of town. As I tried to explain to mother when she picked a Chinese
Next from Wal-Mart (disaster at it meanest) it is the best bicycle I've
owned in 10 years! The chain is taut and strong. I haven't enjoyed a
bike so much in a long time.

You still post, Mark and the antiqueer stooges post. You have a weird
sence of perception.

Loading...