Post by Leif EriksonPost by Stan de SDThe issue isn't showing dead soldiers. The issue is going along with
this
guy, knowing he's out to kill one of our own. If any Allied journalist
had
been caught tagging along with the Nazis, he would have been shot as a
traitor - no trial, no detention, no pinko ACLU lawyers advocating his
case.
You're always telling people what the issue is.
I tell people what the issue is when they demonstrably can't figure it out
on their own.
The aftereffect of
showing dead American soldier is something this Administration
has been sucessful hiding from the public since the inception
of our occupation in the Middle East. How many American
coffins have you seen with the U.S. flag drapped over then?
Why do you desperately want to see a dead American soldier,
No dead American soldier was shown in the video, Stain.
Post by Stan de SDNone but for a couple of clandestine photos taken. Grinder
is right -- it has everything to do with showing dead soldiers.
Bullshit.
No.
Post by Stan de SDIt has to do with knowing cooperating with an enemy,
No, Stain. That's just your usual hysterical
"Traitor!" bullshit.
It isn't "bullshit". The film was made deliberately as a propaganda effort,
to bolster the morale of the terrorists and demoralize US troops. Not that I
would expect a stupid Norwegian (a country whose politicians openly
cooperated with the Nazis in selling out their own country) to understand
anything about military morale. Not to denigrate those brave Norwegians
standing ever so vigilant against the worldwide conspiracy of herring
poachers - but you're an "also-ran" country of cowards afraid to stand up to
the Muslim heathens overrunning your own sad excuse for a country:
==============================================
Stortinget, the Norwegian parliament, in April 2005 passed a new
Discrimination Act. The act says in pretty clear words that in cases of
suspected direct or indirect discrimination due to religion or ethnicity,
Norwegians are guilty until proven otherwise. To me, it is surprising that
they are allowed to pass such legislation at all. Isn't it a fundamental
part of all international law that a person should be innocent until proven
otherwise? Aren't our politicians thus depriving Norwegians of even the most
basic human rights? However, I have heard claims that it is technically
legal to do this. The act was passed in April with the approval of all
parties in parliament, more than 80 % of MPs, with the sole exception of the
right-wing Progress Party. Immigration spokesman for the Progress Party, Per
Sandberg, is deeply disappointed and fears the consequences of the new
legislation. "This will jeopardize the rights of ordinary, law-abiding
Norwegian citizens. The principle of reverse burden of proof means that
Norwegians are guilty of discrimination unless they can prove otherwise. It
will lead to many convictions of innocent people. Reverse burden of proof is
also combined with liability to pay compensation, which means that innocent
persons risk having to pay huge sums for things they didn't do."
It is unclear why this act is needed at all, given that a survey of
immigrants only a few months ago indicates that a vast majority don't feel
they've been discriminated against in Norway. Racism appears to be less
widespread than earlier believed. And why on earth are we supposed to show
this ridiculous reverence and respect for their utterly failed Islamic
cultures in the first place? Why should people who come from some of the
most advanced countries on the planet have to crawl for those who come from
the most backward ones? If their Islamic societies are so great, how come
people from these countries burn their passports and treat their fingers
with acid to remove fingerprints, all in order to get into our?
"Anti-racist" organizations are given a significant role in the new act.
There is a new, state-sponsored Equality Ombudsman who will be responsible
for enforcing it, and coerce all employers who refuse to abide by it. A
multicultural Inquisition, in other words. Cabinet minister Erna Solberg,
who has earlier called for the establishment of a sharia council in Norway,
proposed the new law. It will cover everything from the workplace to the
housing market. In a recent case, a local furniture store wouldn't allow a
female employee to wear a head scarf, arguing that it violated the store's
dress code. Solberg's proposal will toughen the law, and also require those
charged to mount proof of their innocence. Solberg argues that existing law
already makes it illegal for employers, for example, to prevent women from
wearing head scarves if their religion calls for it. Her proposed law "would
make this even more clear." This act could open the floodgates for all kinds
of unreasonable demands from Muslim immigrants in particular, who will be
given a licence for extortion of employers, courtesy of the Norwegian
parliament. For instance, it is likely that they can now claim that it is
"discrimination" if they don't have a special prayer room provided. Already,
Muslim taxi drivers demand a separate prayer room at Oslo Airport, where
they can pray during working hours, but have received a negative answer. The
leader of the Somali Taxi Association, Ali Hassan, finds this discriminating
and unacceptable, and is planning a law suit over the matter: "We think we
have a right to pray during working hours. We demand to get a room where we
can perform prayers, without losing our spot in the taxi queue." At the same
time as this is going on, blind people with their guide dogs are finding it
increasingly difficult to get a taxi ride in the Oslo region, where Muslims
make up a high percentage of cab drivers.
It is frustrating that Norwegian authorities make it mandatory for all
non-Muslims to accept hijab, the Islamic veil, in their workplace. Many
non-Muslims find hijab offensive, and even some Muslims, too. The veil, is
not "just a piece of cloth". It serves as a demarcation line between proper,
submissive Muslim women and whores, un-Islamic women who deserve no respect
and are asking for rape. The veil should more properly be viewed as the
uniform of a Totalitarian movement, and a signal to attack those outside the
movement. An Islamic Mufti in Copenhagen, Denmark, sparked a political
outcry after publicly declaring that women who refuse to wear headscarves
are "asking for rape." Apparently, he isn't the only Muslim in Europe to
think this way. Norwegian newspaper Dagbladet reported in 2001 that 65
percent of rapes in Oslo were performed by "non-Western" immigrants - a
category that, in Norway, consists mostly of Muslims. The article quoted a
professor of social anthropology at the University of Oslo, Unni Wikan, as
saying that "Norwegian women must take their share of responsibility for
these rapes" because Muslim men found their manner of dress provocative. The
professor's conclusion was not that Muslim men living in the West needed to
adjust to Western norms, but the exact opposite: "Norwegian women must
realize that we live in a multicultural society and adapt themselves to it."
In January 2005, Norwegian media reported that 2004 saw the highest number
or rape charges ever recorded in the capital city of Oslo. Strangely enough,
there was now no mentioning of how immigrants were grossly overrepresented
in rape cases. Why not? Unless there has been a sudden and unexplained drop
in the number of immigrants raping Norwegian women between 2001 and 2004,
which is unlikely, the statistics should be at least as staggering in 2005
as they were before. If they are not revealed, it can only mean that
"somebody" didn't like the numbers presented in 2001, and decided to bury
them. That "somebody" must be a person high up in the police hierarchy,
maybe even in the government. The same thing happens in Sweden. So in the
end, the safety of young Scandinavian women is sacrificed in order to keep
the glossy image of a multicultural society intact.
Militant Islamists like Mullah Krekar do reside in Norway. Besides,
Norwegian police have already issued a mobile security alarm to Progress
Party leader Carl I Hagen. They worry that he's a target for terrorists
unhappy with some anti-Islamic remarks he made last summer. Hagen criticized
Islam, and could see no similarity with the concept of moral and justice
found in Christianity. Hagen also said that if Israel loses in the Middle
East, Europe will succumb to Islam next, if Islamic fundamentalists have it
their way. Christians should support Israel and oppose Islamic inroads into
Europe. In an unprecedented step, a group of Muslim ambassadors to Norway
blasted Carl I Hagen in a letter to newspaper Aftenposten, claiming he had
offended 1.3 billion Muslims around the world. Pakistan's ambassador in
particular has interfered in unacceptable ways in Norwegian internal affairs
before, trying to instruct and intimidate a Norwegian politician of
Pakistani origin who dared to voice her support for banning Islamic veils
from Norwegian schools.
Dr. Ole Jørgen Anfindsen, editor, HonestThinking.org, believes that
Norwegian authorities have cheated with prognoses for the number of
immigrants. According to his numbers, ethnic Norwegians will become a
minority in their own country before 2050 if the current trends continue.
The number of Muslims in Norway over 15 years has quadrupled, meaning an
annual growth of more than 9%. A Norwegian researcher warns that ethnic
gangs can give Norway the kind of immigrant-related organized crime that
accompanied waves of migration to the USA. Dr. Inger-Lise Lien concludes
that the ethnic groups themselves are worried. Oslo, which used to be a safe
Scandinavian city, today looks more like New York City pre-Giuliani. Native
Norwegians are quietly moving out of the immigrant ghettos in inner-city
Oslo in large numbers. Tensions with immigrants have spread even to smaller
towns. The trend is identical to what can be seen in neighboring Sweden,
where several cities are now on the verge of collapse. Norway has already
experienced what seems to have been an attempted Islamic terror attack. At
the same time, there is new legislation proposed against "discriminating"
statements made about specific groups, even on Internet discussion forums
and websites. Which means that Norwegians can't say too much about Muslim
immigrants destroying the country, because that is racism and thus illegal.
At a time when the multicultural ideology is increasingly seen as a mistake
in many countries, the authorities here respond by making it the official
state ideology and banning all opposition. The heavily left-leaning
Norwegian media are remarkably quiet about this, and do not make a fuzz
about this infringement of freedom of speech.
Scandinavia is a Utopia lost. Previously quiet Scandinavian nations now
suffer Islamic terror threats and death threats against people criticizing
Islam. Norway celebrates 100 years as an independent state this year.
Judging from this new Discrimination Act and the runaway Muslim immigration,
perhaps the anniversary should be called "From independence to
colonization". At the same time as their women are no longer safe in the
streets because of immigrant gangs, the authorities respond by making
Norwegians de facto second-rate citizens in their own country. They use
their own people as stepping stones for their personal careers in the UN
bureaucracy. Pompous, hypocritical Scandinavian clowns, lecturing about how
to create the perfect society while their own citizens find it increasingly
hard to live in their major cities.
http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/20/042417.php
Norwegian Authorities Still Covering Up Muslim Rapes
In a questions and answers session with newspaper Aftenposten's readers,
Opjordsmoen has some politically correct comments, saying that they don't
know what percentage of these rapes are committed by people with immigrant
background, and that much of these speculations is just "prejudice."
With all due respect, I'm pretty sure that's incorrect. Just a few weeks
earlier, Aftenposten warned that "youths" are in the process of destroying
Norway's capital city, Oslo. Upon closer inspection, it turned out that
these "youths" bear a striking resemblance to the same "youths" with Muslim
immigrant background that are destroying so many cities across Western
Europe. I know Norwegian girls that have experienced harassment by gangs,
and it almost always involves Muslims: Turks, Kurds, Arabs, Pakistanis, and
Somalis.
A 17-year-old Somalian was convicted of the rape of a young girl in Oslo one
year ago. The court stated that the rape was unusually brutal and lasted for
several hours. The Somalian choked the girl for so long that the medical
doctor who examined the girl said that she could have died. The girl is now
suffering from severe psychological problems in the aftermath of the attack.
The youth was sentenced to four and half years in prison. The sentence also
included another rape, where his Norwegian-Moroccan friend raped a
13-year-old girl whilst the Somalian helped to threaten her and keep guard.
She has been traumatized from the incident.
However, Aftenposten seems conveniently enough to have forgotten an article
they printed five years ago. In 2001, two out of three charged with rape in
Norway's capital were immigrants with a non-western background according to
a police study. Norwegian women were victims in 80 percent of the cases.
Unni Wikan, a professor of social anthropology at the University of Oslo, in
2001 said that "Norwegian women must take their share of responsibility for
these rapes" because Muslim men found their manner of dress provocative. The
professor's conclusion was not that Muslim men living in the West needed to
adjust to Western norms, but the exact opposite: "Norwegian women must
realize that we live in a Multicultural society and adapt themselves to it."
The numbers published in September 2001 were discussed in at least to out of
Norway's three largest newspapers: Aftenposten and Dagbladet. A leading
member of the Liberal Party (Venstre), Odd Einar Dørum, demanded that all
the numbers should be put on the table: "A scumbag is a scumbag, regardless
of skin color".
From 2001 to 2005, Dørum was Minister of Justice, and yet nobody has seen
these statistics since 2001. The number of rape charges in Oslo has
continued to rise, reaching record levels in 2005. There is ample evidence
of brutal gang rapes, something that used to be rare in Scandinavia, being
committed by immigrants against native girls. For instance, 21st of July
2005, three men were charged with gang raping a 15-year-old Norwegian girl,
who was dragged into a car while waiting for a bus at the bus station in the
town of Fredrikstad. All the men were of "foreign origin". Such cases have
become almost routine. The only possible explanation for why we are no
longer presented statistics showing the percentage of immigrants involved in
this is that the authorities are covering it up. Usually, this would have
made the media call for the government's resignation. This has not happened,
although I know several journalists have been reading the posts I have made
about this topic, both in English and in Norwegian.
http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2006/07/norwegian-authorities-still-covering.html