Hey, Did You See President Obama Released Four of the Torture Memos Written by the Drunken Frat Boy Administration?

Here are pithy observations of some of the
memos to be found on TPM
1. If you don't keep the guy awake for more
than 11 days, everything's
cool.
2. Waterboarding is not torture. It's a
'controlled acute episode.'
3. Stripping suspects naked in front of women
is okay, especially if
they're modest.
Man, does #2 read like something the Nazis
would say or what?
S. Olson

I'm surprised you didn't include panties on the
head which is a practice the likes of you enjoy
on a daily basis.
Seriously though, I haven't seen those memos yet
and nothing posted above remotely compares to
the well documented atrocities by the Nazis.
Please do tell lib how simulated drowning (water
-EXPERIMENTAL SURGERY - without any anesthesia
-INJECTING VICTIMS WITH CHEMICALS & BIOLOGICAL
SUBSTANCES - then watching mutated results
including eventual death
-HERDING THOUSANDS THROUGH GAS SHOWERS
-MACHINE GUNNING THOUSANDS INTO OPEN TRENCHES -
probably was the most humane
-MASS STARVATION
-FORCED LABOR
-THE LIST IS ENDLESS

There's a "humane" way to indiscriminately machine
gun people?

Sound very right wing extremist

MioMyo

2009-04-18 19:38:55 UTC

I'm surprised you didn't include panties on the head which is a practice
the likes of you enjoy on a daily basis.
Seriously though, I haven't seen those memos yet and nothing posted above
remotely compares to the well documented atrocities by the Nazis.
Please do tell lib how simulated drowning (water over the face) compares
-EXPERIMENTAL SURGERY - without any anesthesia
-INJECTING VICTIMS WITH CHEMICALS & BIOLOGICAL SUBSTANCES - then watching
mutated results including eventual death
-HERDING THOUSANDS THROUGH GAS SHOWERS
-MACHINE GUNNING THOUSANDS INTO OPEN TRENCHES - probably was the most humane
-MASS STARVATION
-FORCED LABOR
-THE LIST IS ENDLESS

There's a "humane" way to indiscriminately machine gun people?
Sound very right wing extremist

No, but your sordid attempt, lib, at justifying any moral equivalence
between what Hitler did and the released memos detailing CIA interrogation
techniques is indeed extremely Left-Wing......

Bill Z.

2009-04-18 21:01:01 UTC

<snip>

2. Waterboarding is not torture. It's a 'controlled acute episode.'

<snip>

Post by MioMyo
Please do tell lib how simulated drowning (water over the face)
-EXPERIMENTAL SURGERY - without any anesthesia
-INJECTING VICTIMS WITH CHEMICALS & BIOLOGICAL SUBSTANCES - then
watching mutated results including eventual death
-HERDING THOUSANDS THROUGH GAS SHOWERS
-MACHINE GUNNING THOUSANDS INTO OPEN TRENCHES - probably was the most humane
-MASS STARVATION
-FORCED LABOR

None of which were used by the Nazis to extract information from
people (something likely to be fatal is counterproductive when the
goal is to get someone to talk).

Try again. At least do a comparision with whatever the Nazis did
when interrogating prisoners who actually were thought to know
something useful.

Adam Whyte-Settlar

2009-04-19 01:14:01 UTC

Post by Bill Z.
<snip>

2. Waterboarding is not torture.

Then you'd have no objection to it being done to your kids then?
(Idiot)

Post by Bill Z.
None of which were used by the Nazis to extract information from
people (something likely to be fatal is counterproductive when the
goal is to get someone to talk).
Try again. At least do a comparision with whatever the Nazis did
when interrogating prisoners who actually were thought to know
something useful.

Doesn't make any difference anyway - just because the nazis did something
doesn't make it OK for Bush's thugs to do the same.
You'd almost think some of these scumbags posting in here didn't WANT
possible torturers to be put on trial.
If they did nothing wrong then they have nothing to worry about.

MioMyo

2009-04-19 03:29:17 UTC

Post by Bill Z.
<snip>

2. Waterboarding is not torture.

Then you'd have no objection to it being done to your kids then?

If she's a terrorist trying to kill millions, absolutely. I would hope
anyone in my family would be water-boarded to prevent such an act.

After all, I know millions would be saved and my family member may have
their feelings hurt, they'd otherwise be whole.

Post by Adam Whyte-Settlar
(Idiot)

Stunning rationale, lib...............

Doesn't make any difference anyway - just because the nazis did something
doesn't make it OK for Bush's thugs to do the same.

But that's not the case because Bush never committed genocide or atrocities
such as Hitler did.........

Post by Adam Whyte-Settlar
You'd almost think some of these scumbags posting in here didn't WANT
possible torturers to be put on trial.

Would that include those torturers who put panties on the top of murdering
terrorists heads?

Post by Adam Whyte-Settlar
If they did nothing wrong then they have nothing to worry about.

Except revisionist liberals who are now redefining, reinterpreting the
constitution along with devining the world according to their addled
imagination.............

Bill Z.

2009-04-19 05:23:25 UTC

[ list of attrocities snipped]

Doesn't make any difference anyway - just because the nazis did
something doesn't make it OK for Bush's thugs to do the same. You'd
almost think some of these scumbags posting in here didn't WANT
possible torturers to be put on trial. If they did nothing wrong
then they have nothing to worry about.

What they were trying to do is to pretend that what Bush's minions did
wasn't really all that bad by comparing what Bush's minions did to
extract information from people to what the Nazis did to exterminate
them. It is basically a dishonest argument on the bart of the right-wing
nuts.

MioMyo

2009-04-19 12:08:48 UTC

Post by Bill Z.
[ list of attrocities snipped]

Doesn't make any difference anyway - just because the nazis did
something doesn't make it OK for Bush's thugs to do the same. You'd
almost think some of these scumbags posting in here didn't WANT
possible torturers to be put on trial. If they did nothing wrong
then they have nothing to worry about.

WRONG- go back and read the lead post by fargo (A LEFT WING NUT); this
poster was the first who attempted to make a moral equivalent argument
comparing authorized CIA interrogation techniques rule appropriate during
the Bush administration with atrocities of the Nazis. Specifically he
postured that CIA water-boarding is tantamount to atrocities employed by
that genocidal regime of Hitler's.

That's why he got his butt kicked up into his larynx........

Bill Z.

2009-04-20 05:17:26 UTC

Post by Bill Z.
[ list of attrocities snipped]

Doesn't make any difference anyway - just because the nazis did
something doesn't make it OK for Bush's thugs to do the same. You'd
almost think some of these scumbags posting in here didn't WANT
possible torturers to be put on trial. If they did nothing wrong
then they have nothing to worry about.

WRONG- go back and read the lead post by fargo (A LEFT WING NUT);
this poster was the first who attempted to make a moral equivalent
argument comparing authorized CIA interrogation techniques rule
appropriate during the Bush administration with atrocities of the
Nazis. Specifically he postured that CIA water-boarding is tantamount
to atrocities employed by that genocidal regime of Hitler's.

Wrong - in <news:4_lGl.19127$***@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com> you
wrote:

Please do tell lib how simulated drowning (water over the face)
compares to these acts by Hitler:

-EXPERIMENTAL SURGERY - without any anesthesia

-INJECTING VICTIMS WITH CHEMICALS & BIOLOGICAL SUBSTANCES - then
watching mutated results including eventual death

-HERDING THOUSANDS THROUGH GAS SHOWERS

-MACHINE GUNNING THOUSANDS INTO OPEN TRENCHES - probably was the most humane

-MASS STARVATION

-FORCED LABOR

-THE LIST IS ENDLESS

You were comparing interrogation techniques to what they did to people
who they viewed as expendable, who they despised and who they intended
to kill. A fair comparison would be to compare what we did to extract
information from people to what the Nazis did to extract information
from people. If you had done that, you'd still be able to claim the
Nazis were worse, not that their behavior is at all relevant as they
hardly represent the minimum acceptable standard.

MioMyo

2009-04-21 02:50:48 UTC

Post by Bill Z.
[ list of attrocities snipped]

Doesn't make any difference anyway - just because the nazis did
something doesn't make it OK for Bush's thugs to do the same. You'd
almost think some of these scumbags posting in here didn't WANT
possible torturers to be put on trial. If they did nothing wrong
then they have nothing to worry about.

WRONG- go back and read the lead post by fargo (A LEFT WING NUT);
this poster was the first who attempted to make a moral equivalent
argument comparing authorized CIA interrogation techniques rule
appropriate during the Bush administration with atrocities of the
Nazis. Specifically he postured that CIA water-boarding is tantamount
to atrocities employed by that genocidal regime of Hitler's.

Please do tell lib how simulated drowning (water over the face)
-EXPERIMENTAL SURGERY - without any anesthesia
-INJECTING VICTIMS WITH CHEMICALS & BIOLOGICAL SUBSTANCES - then
watching mutated results including eventual death
-HERDING THOUSANDS THROUGH GAS SHOWERS
-MACHINE GUNNING THOUSANDS INTO OPEN TRENCHES - probably was the most humane
-MASS STARVATION
-FORCED LABOR
-THE LIST IS ENDLESS
You were comparing interrogation techniques to what they did to people
who they viewed as expendable, who they despised and who they intended
to kill. A fair comparison would be to compare what we did to extract
information from people to what the Nazis did to extract information
from people. If you had done that, you'd still be able to claim the
Nazis were worse, not that their behavior is at all relevant as they
hardly represent the minimum acceptable standard.

I apologize, but I didn't know you are invincibly ignorant.

Bill Z.

2009-04-21 06:11:00 UTC

Post by Bill Z.
[ list of attrocities snipped]

Doesn't make any difference anyway - just because the nazis did
something doesn't make it OK for Bush's thugs to do the same. You'd
almost think some of these scumbags posting in here didn't WANT
possible torturers to be put on trial. If they did nothing wrong
then they have nothing to worry about.

WRONG- go back and read the lead post by fargo (A LEFT WING NUT);
this poster was the first who attempted to make a moral equivalent
argument comparing authorized CIA interrogation techniques rule
appropriate during the Bush administration with atrocities of the
Nazis. Specifically he postured that CIA water-boarding is tantamount
to atrocities employed by that genocidal regime of Hitler's.

I apologize, but I didn't know you are invincibly ignorant.

You should apologize for lacking the honesty to admit what a silly
thing you said when the proof was right in front of your face.
Consider yourself compeletely discredited.

MioMyo

2009-04-21 10:03:48 UTC

Post by Bill Z.
[ list of attrocities snipped]

Doesn't make any difference anyway - just because the nazis did
something doesn't make it OK for Bush's thugs to do the same. You'd
almost think some of these scumbags posting in here didn't WANT
possible torturers to be put on trial. If they did nothing wrong
then they have nothing to worry about.

WRONG- go back and read the lead post by fargo (A LEFT WING NUT);
this poster was the first who attempted to make a moral equivalent
argument comparing authorized CIA interrogation techniques rule
appropriate during the Bush administration with atrocities of the
Nazis. Specifically he postured that CIA water-boarding is tantamount
to atrocities employed by that genocidal regime of Hitler's.

I apologize, but I didn't know you are invincibly ignorant.

You should apologize for lacking the honesty to admit what a silly
thing you said when the proof was right in front of your face.

I apologized ONLY for slapping around an ignoramus before knowing I was
dealing with an inferior.

Post by Bill Z.
Consider yourself compeletely discredited.

Why because you say so?

ROFLMFAO............

Bill Z.

2009-04-21 15:12:37 UTC

Post by Bill Z.
You were comparing interrogation techniques to what they did to people
who they viewed as expendable, who they despised and who they intended
to kill. A fair comparison would be to compare what we did to extract
information from people to what the Nazis did to extract information
from people. If you had done that, you'd still be able to claim the
Nazis were worse, not that their behavior is at all relevant as they
hardly represent the minimum acceptable standard.

I apologize, but I didn't know you are invincibly ignorant.

You should apologize for lacking the honesty to admit what a silly
thing you said when the proof was right in front of your face.

I apologized ONLY for slapping around an ignoramus before knowing I
was dealing with an inferior.

You really are an idiot, aren't you!

Post by Bill Z.
Consider yourself compeletely discredited.

Why because you say so?
ROFLMFAO............

No, because you made a fool of yourself as clearly shown above.

MioMyo

2009-04-19 01:18:08 UTC

Post by Bill Z.
<snip>

2. Waterboarding is not torture. It's a 'controlled acute episode.'

<snip>

None of which were used by the Nazis to extract information from
people (something likely to be fatal is counterproductive when the
goal is to get someone to talk).

Right, it was for a far more heinous reason..... GENOCIDE!

Post by Bill Z.
Try again.

I suggest you take your own advice that is if you first understand why your
retort, besides being completely irrelevant is a total non-sequitur.
Furthermore, unbeknownst to you is pointless and uttlerly benign with regard
to anything in the memo or the Bush administration......

Post by Bill Z.
At least do a comparision with whatever the Nazis did
when interrogating prisoners who actually were thought to know
something useful.

So you deduce that Nazis would kill people for the purpose of annihilating a
race while on the other hand would hand candy to their enemies when wanting
to extract information from them.

How interesting!

Bill Z.

2009-04-19 05:29:59 UTC

Post by Bill Z.
<snip>

2. Waterboarding is not torture. It's a 'controlled acute episode.'

<snip>

None of which were used by the Nazis to extract information from
people (something likely to be fatal is counterproductive when the
goal is to get someone to talk).

Right, it was for a far more heinous reason..... GENOCIDE!

Which makes your comparision wrong.

Post by Bill Z.
Try again.

I suggest you take your own advice that is if you first understand why
your retort, besides being completely irrelevant is a total
non-sequitur. Furthermore, unbeknownst to you is pointless and
uttlerly benign with regard to anything in the memo or the Bush
administration......

I suggest you try to be less dishonest (even if it is difficult for you)
and do an accurate comparison.

Post by Bill Z.
At least do a comparision with whatever the Nazis did
when interrogating prisoners who actually were thought to know
something useful.

So you deduce that Nazis would kill people for the purpose of
annihilating a race while on the other hand would hand candy to their
enemies when wanting to extract information from them.
How interesting!

No, moron, I figure that what they'd do to extract information from
prisoners would not be something likely to kill the prisoners before
the information could be extracted or that would make it impossible
for the prisoners to say something once they decided to talk.

Your inability to produce an honest argument, however, tells us a hell
of a lot about you personally, and none of it is complementary.

MioMyo

2009-04-19 12:18:25 UTC

Post by Bill Z.
<snip>

2. Waterboarding is not torture. It's a 'controlled acute episode.'

<snip>

None of which were used by the Nazis to extract information from
people (something likely to be fatal is counterproductive when the
goal is to get someone to talk).

Right, it was for a far more heinous reason..... GENOCIDE!

Which makes your comparision wrong.

Then you would be required to make that same assessment applicable to the
lead post which was the first to compare atrocities by Nazis to CIA
interogation techniques.

Therefore it will be appropriate to assess your failure to make such a
similar observation for that moral equivication as partisan hypocrisy.

Post by Bill Z.
Try again.

I suggest you take your own advice that is if you first understand why
your retort, besides being completely irrelevant is a total
non-sequitur. Furthermore, unbeknownst to you is pointless and
uttlerly benign with regard to anything in the memo or the Bush
administration......

I suggest you try to be less dishonest (even if it is difficult for you)
and do an accurate comparison.

I suggest you try being consistant, not blindly partisan, in your
consternation of irrelvant postings.

Post by Bill Z.
At least do a comparision with whatever the Nazis did
when interrogating prisoners who actually were thought to know
something useful.

So you deduce that Nazis would kill people for the purpose of
annihilating a race while on the other hand would hand candy to their
enemies when wanting to extract information from them.
How interesting!

Waterboarding kills?

Are you really that ignorant?

Post by Bill Z.
Your inability to produce an honest argument, however, tells us a hell
of a lot about you personally, and none of it is complementary.

Good show lib, try changing the argument to the poster and attacking the
messenger instead of rebutting the argument, how typically liberal of you.

MioMyo

2009-04-26 00:25:45 UTC

I'm not the one who regularly refers to the President of the United
States as 'obammy,' trying to conjure up the picture of the President
as a black woman in a plantation house.

LOL.....You're the only one who would see it that way, racist.

LOL. Whatsa' matter DannyBoy? Scared that I'm right and we're LOTS
smarter than you think?
It's a hallmark of GOP Cocksuckers that they think they are totally
guiltless of racism if they don't say the word 'nigger.'

Yet libtards like you believe you're immune of being a racist when you do
use the "N" word.

Hypocrisy becomes you bitch.

S. Olson

MioMyo

2009-04-26 00:54:08 UTC