Discussion:
KCBS 5 goes with Spocko story first thing out of the chute at 11pm
(too old to reply)
Stan de SD
2007-01-12 02:37:44 UTC
Permalink

Well worth watching, plus it's fair and balanced. Well at least fair
since the Mouse declined to comment. Of course, it is hard to defend
such crap.
Isn't it interesting that in a country that prides itself on "free
speech", the right to express unpopular views (or
non-politically-correct views) must still be vigorously defended?
I was attending Cal in '94 and witnessed many of the same individuals who
were marching to celebrate the 40th anniversary of the "Free Speech
Movement" one week, busting into an auditorium and rioting the following
week to shut down some speaker because they didn't agree with his views.
"Free Speech for Me, but Not for Thee..." :O|
Spartakus
2007-01-12 03:38:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Stan de SD
I was attending Cal in '94 and witnessed many of the same individuals who
were marching to celebrate the 40th anniversary of the "Free Speech
Movement" one week,
The Free Speech Movement started in 1964, 30 years before you claim to
have attended Cal. Care to clarify?
Post by Stan de SD
busting into an auditorium and rioting the following week to shut down
some speaker because they didn't agree with his views.
"Free Speech for Me, but Not for Thee..." :O|
So was it 1994 or 2004? And who was the speaker? You're a little
short on specifics, fella.
Stan de SD
2007-01-12 03:57:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Spartakus
Post by Stan de SD
I was attending Cal in '94 and witnessed many of the same individuals who
were marching to celebrate the 40th anniversary of the "Free Speech
Movement" one week,
The Free Speech Movement started in 1964, 30 years before you claim to
have attended Cal. Care to clarify?
Typo, meant 30th..
Post by Spartakus
Post by Stan de SD
busting into an auditorium and rioting the following week to shut down
some speaker because they didn't agree with his views.
"Free Speech for Me, but Not for Thee..." :O|
So was it 1994 or 2004? And who was the speaker?
1994, speaker was David Irving, whose views I do NOT endorse BTW.
Spartakus
2007-01-13 04:23:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Stan de SD
Post by Spartakus
Post by Stan de SD
I was attending Cal in '94 and witnessed many of the same individuals
who were marching to celebrate the 40th anniversary of the "Free Speech
Movement" one week,
The Free Speech Movement started in 1964, 30 years before you claim to
have attended Cal. Care to clarify?
Typo, meant 30th..
Post by Spartakus
Post by Stan de SD
busting into an auditorium and rioting the following week to shut down
some speaker because they didn't agree with his views.
"Free Speech for Me, but Not for Thee..." :O|
So was it 1994 or 2004? And who was the speaker?
1994, speaker was David Irving, whose views I do NOT endorse BTW.
Apparently, he appeared at UC Berkeley several times during that time
frame. Some of his appearances went off without a hitch. One had to
be cancelled because the protestors wouldn't let anyone in the hall.
Anyway, I think it's remarkable that you could positively identify
marchers int the Free Speech Movement parade as protestors against
Irving. 13 years later, even.
Stan de SD
2007-01-15 03:56:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Spartakus
Post by Stan de SD
Post by Spartakus
Post by Stan de SD
I was attending Cal in '94 and witnessed many of the same individuals
who were marching to celebrate the 40th anniversary of the "Free Speech
Movement" one week,
The Free Speech Movement started in 1964, 30 years before you claim to
have attended Cal. Care to clarify?
Typo, meant 30th..
Post by Spartakus
Post by Stan de SD
busting into an auditorium and rioting the following week to shut down
some speaker because they didn't agree with his views.
"Free Speech for Me, but Not for Thee..." :O|
So was it 1994 or 2004? And who was the speaker?
1994, speaker was David Irving, whose views I do NOT endorse BTW.
Apparently, he appeared at UC Berkeley several times during that time
frame. Some of his appearances went off without a hitch. One had to
be cancelled because the protestors wouldn't let anyone in the hall.
That's a bit of the understatement. The mob rioted, forced their way into
the hall, and started shoving people around, forcing the event to be
cancelled.
Stan de SD
2007-01-15 04:14:43 UTC
Permalink
You seem to have a bit of a reading comprehension problem. Go back and
re-read the thread, and try not to twist things around, OK?
Once again, he has apologized for several things he has said in the
past, which he himself has admitted; this is not an isolated incident.
BZZZZT -- you lose. Thanks for playing.
Where did I say that he didn't apologize? You're distorting the point of
argument again, most likely because you can't win any type of argument or
debate without doing such. For the record:

==================================
So are comments made about "killing the Jews" by militant Muslim slime. At
least Sussman had the decency to apologize... :O|
==================================

Once again, you dissed Sussman for using "hate speech", referring to a
remark taken out of context (a caller said he wasn't Muslim, and Sussman
tried to see if he was bluffing by asking if he would say "Allah was a
whore."). Sussman apolgized, and you still pissed and moaned. I pointed out
your hypocrisy and double standards in whining and crying about Sussman
making remarks about Muslims that incited nobody, and for which he
apologized, while refusing to make any such criticism of the incessant
accusations and slanders made by Muslims that HAVE incited people to KILL,
for which they have NEVER apologized for, and continue doing to this day.
Naturally, being a dyed-in-the-wool doctrinaire Lefty Liberal, you can't
deal with that remark, so you twist and turn this into somehow me being
wroung becaause I somehow asserted that Sussman never apologized. You're
merely showing your tendencies towards the Ric Silver/Bill Zaumen school of
dishonest assholery - and it's not working... :O|

Loading...