Discussion:
Keep Up the Heat on ABC
(too old to reply)
Stan de SD
2006-09-10 19:46:04 UTC
Permalink
"The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:***@comcast.com...
>
> "Angry Young Man!" <***@bush.net> wrote in message
> news:4HFMg.17427$%***@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
> >
> > "Jafo" <***@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
> > news:***@4ax.com...
> > > As viewed from alt.california, Angry Young Man! wrote:
> > >
> > >>"Jafo" wrote...
> > >>>the PacBell Poster wrote:
> > >>>>Bill Clinton, "did a good job of stopping a second attack on
> > >>>>the World Trade Center when he was president."
> > >
> > >>>He got out just in time, didn't he?
> > >
> > >>He gave Bush the Intel.
> > >
> > > It was probably all stuffed in Sandy Berger's pants. :)
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jafo
> >
> > Berger didn't stuff ANYTHING in his pants.
>
> You checked personally?
>
> Anyway, wasn't he the one who admitted to doing it... in his pants, that
is?

Funny how Travis Campbell AKA the Pac Bell Poster can't mask his own
stupidity, even with 50+ name changes to his credit... :O|
robw
2006-09-10 21:44:31 UTC
Permalink
Lame response.
You got nothing so you go for ng etiquette?

Nitwit.


"Stan de SD" <***@covad.net> wrote in message
news:ab18$45046b6b$45035f0d$***@msgid.meganewsservers.com...
>
> "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:***@comcast.com...
> >
> > "Angry Young Man!" <***@bush.net> wrote in message
> > news:4HFMg.17427$%***@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
> > >
> > > "Jafo" <***@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
> > > news:***@4ax.com...
> > > > As viewed from alt.california, Angry Young Man! wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>"Jafo" wrote...
> > > >>>the PacBell Poster wrote:
> > > >>>>Bill Clinton, "did a good job of stopping a second attack on
> > > >>>>the World Trade Center when he was president."
> > > >
> > > >>>He got out just in time, didn't he?
> > > >
> > > >>He gave Bush the Intel.
> > > >
> > > > It was probably all stuffed in Sandy Berger's pants. :)
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Jafo
> > >
> > > Berger didn't stuff ANYTHING in his pants.
> >
> > You checked personally?
> >
> > Anyway, wasn't he the one who admitted to doing it... in his pants, that
> is?
>
> Funny how Travis Campbell AKA the Pac Bell Poster can't mask his own
> stupidity, even with 50+ name changes to his credit... :O|
>
>
Stan de SD
2006-09-10 23:42:22 UTC
Permalink
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:***@comcast.com...
> Lame response.
> You got nothing so you go for ng etiquette?

Let me guess. You know nothing about what Sandy Berger did, correct?

>
>
> "Stan de SD" <***@covad.net> wrote in message
> news:ab18$45046b6b$45035f0d$***@msgid.meganewsservers.com...
> >
> > "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:***@comcast.com...
> > >
> > > "Angry Young Man!" <***@bush.net> wrote in message
> > > news:4HFMg.17427$%***@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
> > > >
> > > > "Jafo" <***@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
> > > > news:***@4ax.com...
> > > > > As viewed from alt.california, Angry Young Man! wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >>"Jafo" wrote...
> > > > >>>the PacBell Poster wrote:
> > > > >>>>Bill Clinton, "did a good job of stopping a second attack on
> > > > >>>>the World Trade Center when he was president."
> > > > >
> > > > >>>He got out just in time, didn't he?
> > > > >
> > > > >>He gave Bush the Intel.
> > > > >
> > > > > It was probably all stuffed in Sandy Berger's pants. :)
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Jafo
> > > >
> > > > Berger didn't stuff ANYTHING in his pants.
> > >
> > > You checked personally?
> > >
> > > Anyway, wasn't he the one who admitted to doing it... in his pants,
that
> > is?
> >
> > Funny how Travis Campbell AKA the Pac Bell Poster can't mask his own
> > stupidity, even with 50+ name changes to his credit... :O|
> >
> >
>
>
robw
2006-09-11 00:01:40 UTC
Permalink
Who was the president on 9-11?

Real simple.


"Stan de SD" <***@covad.net> wrote in message
news:5bbb7$4504a2cc$45035f0d$***@msgid.meganewsservers.com...
>
> "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:***@comcast.com...
> > Lame response.
> > You got nothing so you go for ng etiquette?
>
> Let me guess. You know nothing about what Sandy Berger did, correct?
>
> >
> >
> > "Stan de SD" <***@covad.net> wrote in message
> > news:ab18$45046b6b$45035f0d$***@msgid.meganewsservers.com...
> > >
> > > "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > >
> > > > "Angry Young Man!" <***@bush.net> wrote in message
> > > > news:4HFMg.17427$%***@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
> > > > >
> > > > > "Jafo" <***@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
> > > > > news:***@4ax.com...
> > > > > > As viewed from alt.california, Angry Young Man! wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >>"Jafo" wrote...
> > > > > >>>the PacBell Poster wrote:
> > > > > >>>>Bill Clinton, "did a good job of stopping a second attack on
> > > > > >>>>the World Trade Center when he was president."
> > > > > >
> > > > > >>>He got out just in time, didn't he?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >>He gave Bush the Intel.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It was probably all stuffed in Sandy Berger's pants. :)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Jafo
> > > > >
> > > > > Berger didn't stuff ANYTHING in his pants.
> > > >
> > > > You checked personally?
> > > >
> > > > Anyway, wasn't he the one who admitted to doing it... in his pants,
> that
> > > is?
> > >
> > > Funny how Travis Campbell AKA the Pac Bell Poster can't mask his own
> > > stupidity, even with 50+ name changes to his credit... :O|
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
The Pervert
2006-09-11 01:23:45 UTC
Permalink
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:***@comcast.com...
> Who was the president on 9-11?
>
> Real simple.

If you want to reduced something so complex to a simplistic (and incredibly
stupid) question like that, you're not as smart as I used to think you were.
robw
2006-09-11 15:30:56 UTC
Permalink
But is it not true?


"The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:***@comcast.com...
>
> "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:***@comcast.com...
> > Who was the president on 9-11?
> >
> > Real simple.
>
> If you want to reduced something so complex to a simplistic (and
incredibly
> stupid) question like that, you're not as smart as I used to think you
were.
>
>
The Pervert
2006-09-12 00:32:30 UTC
Permalink
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:***@comcast.com...

> But is it not true?

FDR was president on Dex 7, 1941 when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor. Is he to
blame for WWII?

Real simple.


> "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:***@comcast.com...
> >
> > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > Who was the president on 9-11?
> > >
> > > Real simple.
> >
> > If you want to reduced something so complex to a simplistic (and
> > incredibly stupid) question like that, you're not as smart as
> >I used to think you were.
robw
2006-09-12 01:03:05 UTC
Permalink
Yes.
He is.

Your thoughts?


"The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:***@comcast.com...
>
> "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:***@comcast.com...
>
> > But is it not true?
>
> FDR was president on Dex 7, 1941 when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor. Is he
to
> blame for WWII?
>
> Real simple.
>
>
> > "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:***@comcast.com...
> > >
> > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > Who was the president on 9-11?
> > > >
> > > > Real simple.
> > >
> > > If you want to reduced something so complex to a simplistic (and
> > > incredibly stupid) question like that, you're not as smart as
> > >I used to think you were.
>
>
The Pervert
2006-09-12 02:52:55 UTC
Permalink
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:***@comcast.com...
> Yes.
> He is.
>
> Your thoughts?

I think you have absolutely no understanding of history or the way the real
world works. But such is your right.

I also think you sound like you're about thirteen years old.




> "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:***@comcast.com...
> >
> > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > news:***@comcast.com...
> >
> > > But is it not true?
> >
> > FDR was president on Dex 7, 1941 when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor.
> > Is he to blame for WWII?
> >
> > Real simple.
> >
> >
> > > "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > >
> > > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > > Who was the president on 9-11?
> > > > >
> > > > > Real simple.
> > > >
> > > > If you want to reduced something so complex to a simplistic (and
> > > > incredibly stupid) question like that, you're not as smart as
> > > >I used to think you were.
robw
2006-09-12 03:00:00 UTC
Permalink
The question was , was FDR the president when Pearl Harbor happened.

I said, yes.

Your problem?



"The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:JoudnZGS283ovJvYnZ2dnUVZ_s-***@comcast.com...
>
> "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:***@comcast.com...
> > Yes.
> > He is.
> >
> > Your thoughts?
>
> I think you have absolutely no understanding of history or the way the
real
> world works. But such is your right.
>
> I also think you sound like you're about thirteen years old.
>
>
>
>
> > "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:***@comcast.com...
> > >
> > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > >
> > > > But is it not true?
> > >
> > > FDR was president on Dex 7, 1941 when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor.
> > > Is he to blame for WWII?
> > >
> > > Real simple.
> > >
> > >
> > > > "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > >
> > > > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > > > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > > > Who was the president on 9-11?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Real simple.
> > > > >
> > > > > If you want to reduced something so complex to a simplistic (and
> > > > > incredibly stupid) question like that, you're not as smart as
> > > > >I used to think you were.
>
>
>
>
The Pervert
2006-09-12 11:00:29 UTC
Permalink
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:***@comcast.com...
> The question was , was FDR the president when Pearl Harbor happened.
>
> I said, yes.
>
> Your problem?

The question was also, "Is he to blame for WWII?"

Aren't you being taught in school to RTFQ? Read the full question!



> "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:JoudnZGS283ovJvYnZ2dnUVZ_s-***@comcast.com...
> >
> > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > Yes.
> > > He is.
> > >
> > > Your thoughts?
> >
> > I think you have absolutely no understanding of history or the way the
> real
> > world works. But such is your right.
> >
> > I also think you sound like you're about thirteen years old.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > >
> > > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > >
> > > > > But is it not true?
> > > >
> > > > FDR was president on Dex 7, 1941 when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor.
> > > > Is he to blame for WWII?
> > > >
> > > > Real simple.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > > > > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > > > > Who was the president on 9-11?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Real simple.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If you want to reduced something so complex to a simplistic (and
> > > > > > incredibly stupid) question like that, you're not as smart as
> > > > > >I used to think you were.
robw
2006-09-12 15:53:53 UTC
Permalink
Look, your "question" was but a dodge to my Busch comment.


"The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1o-***@comcast.com...
>
> "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:***@comcast.com...
> > The question was , was FDR the president when Pearl Harbor happened.
> >
> > I said, yes.
> >
> > Your problem?
>
> The question was also, "Is he to blame for WWII?"
>
> Aren't you being taught in school to RTFQ? Read the full question!
>
>
>
> > "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:JoudnZGS283ovJvYnZ2dnUVZ_s-***@comcast.com...
> > >
> > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > Yes.
> > > > He is.
> > > >
> > > > Your thoughts?
> > >
> > > I think you have absolutely no understanding of history or the way the
> > real
> > > world works. But such is your right.
> > >
> > > I also think you sound like you're about thirteen years old.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > >
> > > > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > > > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > >
> > > > > > But is it not true?
> > > > >
> > > > > FDR was president on Dex 7, 1941 when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor.
> > > > > Is he to blame for WWII?
> > > > >
> > > > > Real simple.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > > > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > > > > > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > > > > > Who was the president on 9-11?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Real simple.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If you want to reduced something so complex to a simplistic
(and
> > > > > > > incredibly stupid) question like that, you're not as smart as
> > > > > > >I used to think you were.
>
>
The Pervert
2006-09-12 16:13:17 UTC
Permalink
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:***@comcast.com...
> Look, your "question" was but a dodge to my Busch comment.

Your Bush comment was a dodge to common sense.



> "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1o-***@comcast.com...
> >
> > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > The question was , was FDR the president when Pearl Harbor happened.
> > >
> > > I said, yes.
> > >
> > > Your problem?
> >
> > The question was also, "Is he to blame for WWII?"
> >
> > Aren't you being taught in school to RTFQ? Read the full question!
> >
> >
> >
> > > "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > news:JoudnZGS283ovJvYnZ2dnUVZ_s-***@comcast.com...
> > > >
> > > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > > Yes.
> > > > > He is.
> > > > >
> > > > > Your thoughts?
> > > >
> > > > I think you have absolutely no understanding of history or the way
the
> > > real
> > > > world works. But such is your right.
> > > >
> > > > I also think you sound like you're about thirteen years old.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > > > > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > But is it not true?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > FDR was president on Dex 7, 1941 when Japan attacked Pearl
Harbor.
> > > > > > Is he to blame for WWII?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Real simple.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > > > > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > > > > > > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > > > > > > Who was the president on 9-11?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Real simple.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > If you want to reduced something so complex to a simplistic
> (and
> > > > > > > > incredibly stupid) question like that, you're not as smart
as
> > > > > > > >I used to think you were.
> >
> >
>
>
robw
2006-09-12 16:39:46 UTC
Permalink
I simply asked who was the president on 9-11-01?

It apparently touched a nerve.


"The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:***@comcast.com...
>
> "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:***@comcast.com...
> > Look, your "question" was but a dodge to my Busch comment.
>
> Your Bush comment was a dodge to common sense.
>
>
>
> > "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:1o-***@comcast.com...
> > >
> > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > The question was , was FDR the president when Pearl Harbor happened.
> > > >
> > > > I said, yes.
> > > >
> > > > Your problem?
> > >
> > > The question was also, "Is he to blame for WWII?"
> > >
> > > Aren't you being taught in school to RTFQ? Read the full question!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:JoudnZGS283ovJvYnZ2dnUVZ_s-***@comcast.com...
> > > > >
> > > > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > > > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > > > Yes.
> > > > > > He is.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Your thoughts?
> > > > >
> > > > > I think you have absolutely no understanding of history or the way
> the
> > > > real
> > > > > world works. But such is your right.
> > > > >
> > > > > I also think you sound like you're about thirteen years old.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > > > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > > > > > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > But is it not true?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > FDR was president on Dex 7, 1941 when Japan attacked Pearl
> Harbor.
> > > > > > > Is he to blame for WWII?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Real simple.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > > > > > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > > > > > > > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > > > > > > > Who was the president on 9-11?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Real simple.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > If you want to reduced something so complex to a
simplistic
> > (and
> > > > > > > > > incredibly stupid) question like that, you're not as smart
> as
> > > > > > > > >I used to think you were.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Harold Burton
2006-09-12 19:12:33 UTC
Permalink
In article <D8idnU4F-***@comcast.com>,
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:

> I simply asked who was the president on 9-11-01...


...because you're too stupid too figure it out on your own.
The Pervert
2006-09-12 19:53:52 UTC
Permalink
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:D8idnU4F-***@comcast.com...
> I simply asked who was the president on 9-11-01?
>
> It apparently touched a nerve.

Not at all! Just how misinformed are you? You made a stupid comment and I
asked a relevant question which you felt compelled to dodge.

There was a time when I thought you had some reason and intelligence. I
acknowledge my error.




> "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:***@comcast.com...
> >
> > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > Look, your "question" was but a dodge to my Busch comment.
> >
> > Your Bush comment was a dodge to common sense.
> >
> >
> >
> > > "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > news:1o-***@comcast.com...
> > > >
> > > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > > The question was , was FDR the president when Pearl Harbor
happened.
> > > > >
> > > > > I said, yes.
> > > > >
> > > > > Your problem?
> > > >
> > > > The question was also, "Is he to blame for WWII?"
> > > >
> > > > Aren't you being taught in school to RTFQ? Read the full question!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > > > news:JoudnZGS283ovJvYnZ2dnUVZ_s-***@comcast.com...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > > > > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > > > > Yes.
> > > > > > > He is.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Your thoughts?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think you have absolutely no understanding of history or the
way
> > the
> > > > > real
> > > > > > world works. But such is your right.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I also think you sound like you're about thirteen years old.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > > > > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > > > > > > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > But is it not true?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > FDR was president on Dex 7, 1941 when Japan attacked Pearl
> > Harbor.
> > > > > > > > Is he to blame for WWII?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Real simple.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in
message
> > > > > > > > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > > > > > > > > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > > > > > > > > Who was the president on 9-11?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Real simple.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > If you want to reduced something so complex to a
> simplistic
> > > (and
> > > > > > > > > > incredibly stupid) question like that, you're not as
smart
> > as
> > > > > > > > > >I used to think you were.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
robw
2006-09-12 22:46:58 UTC
Permalink
Yes, FDR was responsible for WWII.

I could care less, but if this makes you feel better....have a great night.

What bothers you is that for all the pomp and docu-mentaries....Busch was
president on 9-11.

Can you say "legacy"??

I know how much that means to you cats.

I guess we know what Busch's will be.


"The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:***@comcast.com...
>
> "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:D8idnU4F-***@comcast.com...
> > I simply asked who was the president on 9-11-01?
> >
> > It apparently touched a nerve.
>
> Not at all! Just how misinformed are you? You made a stupid comment and
I
> asked a relevant question which you felt compelled to dodge.
>
> There was a time when I thought you had some reason and intelligence. I
> acknowledge my error.
>
>
>
>
> > "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:***@comcast.com...
> > >
> > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > Look, your "question" was but a dodge to my Busch comment.
> > >
> > > Your Bush comment was a dodge to common sense.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:1o-***@comcast.com...
> > > > >
> > > > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > > > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > > > The question was , was FDR the president when Pearl Harbor
> happened.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I said, yes.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Your problem?
> > > > >
> > > > > The question was also, "Is he to blame for WWII?"
> > > > >
> > > > > Aren't you being taught in school to RTFQ? Read the full
question!
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > > > > news:JoudnZGS283ovJvYnZ2dnUVZ_s-***@comcast.com...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > > > > > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > > > > > Yes.
> > > > > > > > He is.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Your thoughts?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I think you have absolutely no understanding of history or the
> way
> > > the
> > > > > > real
> > > > > > > world works. But such is your right.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I also think you sound like you're about thirteen years old.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > > > > > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > > > > > > > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > But is it not true?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > FDR was president on Dex 7, 1941 when Japan attacked Pearl
> > > Harbor.
> > > > > > > > > Is he to blame for WWII?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Real simple.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in
> message
> > > > > > > > > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > > > > > > > > > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > > > > > > > > > Who was the president on 9-11?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Real simple.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > If you want to reduced something so complex to a
> > simplistic
> > > > (and
> > > > > > > > > > > incredibly stupid) question like that, you're not as
> smart
> > > as
> > > > > > > > > > >I used to think you were.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Harold Burton
2006-09-13 01:38:42 UTC
Permalink
In article <***@comcast.com>,
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:


>....Busch was president on 9-11.



And Roosenvelt was president on 12-7.
The Pervert
2006-09-13 03:55:26 UTC
Permalink
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:***@comcast.com...
> Yes, FDR was responsible for WWII.
>
> I could care less, but if this makes you feel better....have a great
night.
>
> What bothers you is that for all the pomp and docu-mentaries....Busch was
> president on 9-11.

Why should the truth bother me? Answer: It doesn't.

> Can you say "legacy"??
>
> I know how much that means to you cats.

Obviously you know very little, if anything.

> I guess we know what Busch's will be.

My guess is that it won't be too good. But that isn't because you make up
silly bullshit, write incredibly stupid things, or don't know how to spell
his name.


"The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:***@comcast.com...

> There was a time when I thought you had some reason and intelligence. I
> acknowledge my error.
robw
2006-09-13 23:07:50 UTC
Permalink
Please, if I had a buck for everytime Rush or Hannity, et. al used the term
legacy, I'd be a millionaire. Were you born when Clinton finished his term?
Rush, especially, went overboard.

I'm simply throwing the ball back into your court.

And I spell his name wrong as a total show of disrespect.
Just like KKKLinton, DemocRATS, libtards, etc.

And I'm not a Democrat and thought Clinton was stupid to do what he
did.......but we all warned you.



"The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:***@comcast.com...
>
> "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:***@comcast.com...
> > Yes, FDR was responsible for WWII.
> >
> > I could care less, but if this makes you feel better....have a great
> night.
> >
> > What bothers you is that for all the pomp and docu-mentaries....Busch
was
> > president on 9-11.
>
> Why should the truth bother me? Answer: It doesn't.
>
> > Can you say "legacy"??
> >
> > I know how much that means to you cats.
>
> Obviously you know very little, if anything.
>
> > I guess we know what Busch's will be.
>
> My guess is that it won't be too good. But that isn't because you make up
> silly bullshit, write incredibly stupid things, or don't know how to spell
> his name.
>
>
> "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:***@comcast.com...
>
> > There was a time when I thought you had some reason and intelligence. I
> > acknowledge my error.
>
>
The Pervert
2006-09-14 06:03:32 UTC
Permalink
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:***@comcast.com...
> Please, if I had a buck for everytime Rush or Hannity, et. al used the
term
> legacy, I'd be a millionaire. Were you born when Clinton finished his
term?
> Rush, especially, went overboard.

If you haven't been able to figure it out yet, I'm neither Limbaugh nor Sean
Hannity. Argue with me based on what *I* say, or don't waste my time.

> I'm simply throwing the ball back into your court.

Bullshit. You introduced the term legacy. Lice with it.

> And I spell his name wrong as a total show of disrespect.
> Just like KKKLinton, DemocRATS, libtards, etc.

That's childish, just like those who spell it KKKlintoon. I must conclude,
therefore (based on your behavior), that you and your beliefs are childish.


> > "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:***@comcast.com...
> >
> > > There was a time when I thought you had some reason and intelligence.
I
> > > acknowledge my error.
robw
2006-09-14 23:22:54 UTC
Permalink
I wasn't the one to introduce the term legacy.

It was contained in your post. If not, and your words were pasted to another
response, sorry.

But legacy means much to many conservatives.




"The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:***@comcast.com...
>
> "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:***@comcast.com...
> > Please, if I had a buck for everytime Rush or Hannity, et. al used the
> term
> > legacy, I'd be a millionaire. Were you born when Clinton finished his
> term?
> > Rush, especially, went overboard.
>
> If you haven't been able to figure it out yet, I'm neither Limbaugh nor
Sean
> Hannity. Argue with me based on what *I* say, or don't waste my time.
>
> > I'm simply throwing the ball back into your court.
>
> Bullshit. You introduced the term legacy. Lice with it.
>
> > And I spell his name wrong as a total show of disrespect.
> > Just like KKKLinton, DemocRATS, libtards, etc.
>
> That's childish, just like those who spell it KKKlintoon. I must
conclude,
> therefore (based on your behavior), that you and your beliefs are
childish.
>
>
> > > "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > >
> > > > There was a time when I thought you had some reason and
intelligence.
> I
> > > > acknowledge my error.
>
>
Stan de SD
2006-09-13 21:00:59 UTC
Permalink
"The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:JoudnZGS283ovJvYnZ2dnUVZ_s-***@comcast.com...
>
> "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:***@comcast.com...
> > Yes.
> > He is.
> >
> > Your thoughts?
>
> I think you have absolutely no understanding of history or the way the
real
> world works.

Which is of course why he is a liberal... ;O)
robw
2006-09-13 23:18:57 UTC
Permalink
I'm a liberal because I am an educated,enlightened person who looks at both
sides of things and makes a decision based on how things synch up with my
beliefs.

Therefore, if I agreed with conservative beliefs, I'd be one.


"Stan de SD" <***@covad.net> wrote in message
news:273b3$45087175$45035f0d$***@msgid.meganewsservers.com...
>
> "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:JoudnZGS283ovJvYnZ2dnUVZ_s-***@comcast.com...
> >
> > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > Yes.
> > > He is.
> > >
> > > Your thoughts?
> >
> > I think you have absolutely no understanding of history or the way the
> real
> > world works.
>
> Which is of course why he is a liberal... ;O)
>
>
Harold Burton
2006-09-14 01:10:45 UTC
Permalink
In article <***@comcast.com>,
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:

> I'm a liberal because I am an uneducated, unenlightened person who looks at both
> sides of things and makes a decision based on how I can best confiscate the
> wealth of others.



There, fixed it for ya.
robw
2006-09-14 02:00:52 UTC
Permalink
Know what?
You can debate me, ridicule my thoughts, call me moron, idiot, imbecile.
I can handle it.

But you take my words and change them? (which, by the way, isn't going to
sit real well with your conservative friends here.
i've been posting here for many years and changing headers is mildly
accepted. what you've done is moronic)

You're done. And I know you probably wanted the attention.....but you really
don't know. Trust me.

Usually takes about two or three weeks.

Screen name change, kill file, you think I'm not the only one that's going
to have fun with you?

I'll give you the same advice I've given to countless others.

Know when you hear your conservative heroes be winning and witty and say "I
could do that!"

You can't.


"Harold Burton" <***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-***@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> In article <***@comcast.com>,
> "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > I'm a liberal because I am an uneducated, unenlightened person who looks
at both
> > sides of things and makes a decision based on how I can best confiscate
the
> > wealth of others.
>
>
>
> There, fixed it for ya.
Harold Burton
2006-09-14 02:08:20 UTC
Permalink
In article <AOednXy0C4dSKpXYnZ2dnUVZ_u-***@comcast.com>,
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:

> Know what?
> You can debate me, ridicule my thoughts, call me moron, idiot, imbecile.
> I can handle it.
>
> But you take my words and change them? (which, by the way, isn't going to
> sit real well with your conservative friends here.
> i've been posting here for many years and changing headers is mildly
> accepted. what you've done is moronic)
>
> You're done. And I know you probably wanted the attention.....but you really
> don't know. Trust me.
>
> Usually takes about two or three weeks.
>
> Screen name change, kill file, you think I'm not the only one that's going
> to have fun with you?
>
> I'll give you the same advice I've given to countless others.
>
> Know when you hear your conservative heroes be winning and witty and say "I
> could do that!"
>
> You can't.


I did.


> "Harold Burton" <***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:hal.i.burton-***@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> > In article <***@comcast.com>,
> > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm a liberal because I am an uneducated, unenlightened person who looks
> at both
> > > sides of things and makes a decision based on how I can best confiscate
> the
> > > wealth of others.
> >
> >
> >
> > There, fixed it for ya.
robw
2006-09-14 03:47:38 UTC
Permalink
Not even close.

You changed my words.

you'll suffer.
trust me.


"Harold Burton" <***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-***@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> In article <AOednXy0C4dSKpXYnZ2dnUVZ_u-***@comcast.com>,
> "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > Know what?
> > You can debate me, ridicule my thoughts, call me moron, idiot, imbecile.
> > I can handle it.
> >
> > But you take my words and change them? (which, by the way, isn't going
to
> > sit real well with your conservative friends here.
> > i've been posting here for many years and changing headers is mildly
> > accepted. what you've done is moronic)
> >
> > You're done. And I know you probably wanted the attention.....but you
really
> > don't know. Trust me.
> >
> > Usually takes about two or three weeks.
> >
> > Screen name change, kill file, you think I'm not the only one that's
going
> > to have fun with you?
> >
> > I'll give you the same advice I've given to countless others.
> >
> > Know when you hear your conservative heroes be winning and witty and say
"I
> > could do that!"
> >
> > You can't.
>
>
> I did.
>
>
> > "Harold Burton" <***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:hal.i.burton-***@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> > > In article <***@comcast.com>,
> > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm a liberal because I am an uneducated, unenlightened person who
looks
> > at both
> > > > sides of things and makes a decision based on how I can best
confiscate
> > the
> > > > wealth of others.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > There, fixed it for ya.
Harold Burton
2006-09-14 12:17:09 UTC
Permalink
In article <***@comcast.com>,
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:

> Not even close.
>
> You changed my words.
>
> you'll suffer.
> trust me.


Heheheheheh.




> "Harold Burton" <***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:hal.i.burton-***@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> > In article <AOednXy0C4dSKpXYnZ2dnUVZ_u-***@comcast.com>,
> > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Know what?
> > > You can debate me, ridicule my thoughts, call me moron, idiot, imbecile.
> > > I can handle it.
> > >
> > > But you take my words and change them? (which, by the way, isn't going
> to
> > > sit real well with your conservative friends here.
> > > i've been posting here for many years and changing headers is mildly
> > > accepted. what you've done is moronic)
> > >
> > > You're done. And I know you probably wanted the attention.....but you
> really
> > > don't know. Trust me.
> > >
> > > Usually takes about two or three weeks.
> > >
> > > Screen name change, kill file, you think I'm not the only one that's
> going
> > > to have fun with you?
> > >
> > > I'll give you the same advice I've given to countless others.
> > >
> > > Know when you hear your conservative heroes be winning and witty and say
> "I
> > > could do that!"
> > >
> > > You can't.
> >
> >
> > I did.
> >
> >
> > > "Harold Burton" <***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > news:hal.i.burton-***@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> > > > In article <***@comcast.com>,
> > > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'm a liberal because I am an uneducated, unenlightened person who
> looks
> > > at both
> > > > > sides of things and makes a decision based on how I can best
> confiscate
> > > the
> > > > > wealth of others.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > There, fixed it for ya.
Stan de SD
2006-09-15 23:57:49 UTC
Permalink
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:***@comcast.com...
> Not even close.
>
> You changed my words.
>
> you'll suffer.
> trust me.

Note that Harold openly acknowledged that he did, so it wasn't like he was
deliberately trying to distort the record, as is the tendency of liberals
such as yourself. Now personally, I would have done it a bit differently -
but it's clear that no deception was intended.
robw
2006-09-16 00:07:56 UTC
Permalink
Hey, if you want to defend a dishonest nitwit, so be it.


"Stan de SD" <***@covad.net> wrote in message
news:3168c$450b3ddc$45035f0d$***@msgid.meganewsservers.com...
>
> "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:***@comcast.com...
> > Not even close.
> >
> > You changed my words.
> >
> > you'll suffer.
> > trust me.
>
> Note that Harold openly acknowledged that he did, so it wasn't like he was
> deliberately trying to distort the record, as is the tendency of liberals
> such as yourself. Now personally, I would have done it a bit differently -
> but it's clear that no deception was intended.
>
>
Harold Burton
2006-09-16 01:57:56 UTC
Permalink
In article <***@comcast.com>,
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:

> Hey, if you want to defend a dishonest "nitwit"...


...who you are fixated on.




> "Stan de SD" <***@covad.net> wrote in message
> news:3168c$450b3ddc$45035f0d$***@msgid.meganewsservers.com...
> >
> > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > Not even close.
> > >
> > > You changed my words.
> > >
> > > you'll suffer.
> > > trust me.


Howcum I haven't started to suffer. :-)


> > Note that Harold openly acknowledged that he did, so it wasn't like he was
> > deliberately trying to distort the record, as is the tendency of liberals
> > such as yourself. Now personally, I would have done it a bit differently -
> > but it's clear that no deception was intended.
> >
> >
robw
2006-09-16 02:03:46 UTC
Permalink
"Fixated"?

No.
I believe I respond to everyone that makes comments on my posts. Don't have
killfiles.

I told you you're doing this for attention.




"Harold Burton" <***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-***@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> In article <***@comcast.com>,
> "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > Hey, if you want to defend a dishonest "nitwit"...
>
>
> ...who you are fixated on.
>
>
>
>
> > "Stan de SD" <***@covad.net> wrote in message
> > news:3168c$450b3ddc$45035f0d$***@msgid.meganewsservers.com...
> > >
> > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > Not even close.
> > > >
> > > > You changed my words.
> > > >
> > > > you'll suffer.
> > > > trust me.
>
>
> Howcum I haven't started to suffer. :-)
>
>
> > > Note that Harold openly acknowledged that he did, so it wasn't like he
was
> > > deliberately trying to distort the record, as is the tendency of
liberals
> > > such as yourself. Now personally, I would have done it a bit
differently -
> > > but it's clear that no deception was intended.
> > >
> > >
Harold Burton
2006-09-16 02:27:27 UTC
Permalink
In article <***@comcast.com>,
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:

> "Fixated"?
>
> No.


Obviously yes!


> I believe I respond to everyone that makes comments on my posts. Don't have
> killfiles.
>
> I told you you're doing this for attention.


Doh!


> "Harold Burton" <***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:hal.i.burton-***@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> > In article <***@comcast.com>,
> > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Hey, if you want to defend a dishonest "nitwit"...
> >
> >
> > ...who you are fixated on.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > "Stan de SD" <***@covad.net> wrote in message
> > > news:3168c$450b3ddc$45035f0d$***@msgid.meganewsservers.com...
> > > >
> > > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > > Not even close.
> > > > >
> > > > > You changed my words.
> > > > >
> > > > > you'll suffer.
> > > > > trust me.
> >
> >
> > Howcum I haven't started to suffer. :-)


Once again, howcum I haven't started to suffer?



> > > > Note that Harold openly acknowledged that he did, so it wasn't like he
> was
> > > > deliberately trying to distort the record, as is the tendency of
> liberals
> > > > such as yourself. Now personally, I would have done it a bit
> differently -
> > > > but it's clear that no deception was intended.
> > > >
> > > >
robw
2006-09-16 02:46:14 UTC
Permalink
So all these ng's you post to validate you in some way?

sad.


"Harold Burton" <***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-***@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> In article <***@comcast.com>,
> "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > "Fixated"?
> >
> > No.
>
>
> Obviously yes!
>
>
> > I believe I respond to everyone that makes comments on my posts. Don't
have
> > killfiles.
> >
> > I told you you're doing this for attention.
>
>
> Doh!
>
>
> > "Harold Burton" <***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:hal.i.burton-***@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> > > In article <***@comcast.com>,
> > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hey, if you want to defend a dishonest "nitwit"...
> > >
> > >
> > > ...who you are fixated on.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > "Stan de SD" <***@covad.net> wrote in message
> > > > news:3168c$450b3ddc$45035f0d$***@msgid.meganewsservers.com...
> > > > >
> > > > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > > > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > > > Not even close.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You changed my words.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > you'll suffer.
> > > > > > trust me.
> > >
> > >
> > > Howcum I haven't started to suffer. :-)
>
>
> Once again, howcum I haven't started to suffer?
>
>
>
> > > > > Note that Harold openly acknowledged that he did, so it wasn't
like he
> > was
> > > > > deliberately trying to distort the record, as is the tendency of
> > liberals
> > > > > such as yourself. Now personally, I would have done it a bit
> > differently -
> > > > > but it's clear that no deception was intended.
> > > > >
> > > > >
Harold Burton
2006-09-16 01:55:59 UTC
Permalink
In article <3168c$450b3ddc$45035f0d$***@msgid.meganewsservers.com>,
"Stan de SD" <***@covad.net> wrote:

> "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:***@comcast.com...
> > Not even close.
> >
> > You changed my words.
> >
> > you'll suffer.
> > trust me.
>
> Note that Harold openly acknowledged that he did, so it wasn't like he was
> deliberately trying to distort the record, as is the tendency of liberals
> such as yourself. Now personally, I would have done it a bit differently -
> but it's clear that no deception was intended.


Bingo, you got it, robw didn't. Let's face it, robw isn't very smart.
He is fun to taunt, though, and he is my fanboi.
robw
2006-09-16 02:05:40 UTC
Permalink
When's the last time you "got it" Cuz?

Tell us about your girl.


"Harold Burton" <***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-***@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> In article <3168c$450b3ddc$45035f0d$***@msgid.meganewsservers.com>,
> "Stan de SD" <***@covad.net> wrote:
>
> > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > Not even close.
> > >
> > > You changed my words.
> > >
> > > you'll suffer.
> > > trust me.
> >
> > Note that Harold openly acknowledged that he did, so it wasn't like he
was
> > deliberately trying to distort the record, as is the tendency of
liberals
> > such as yourself. Now personally, I would have done it a bit
differently -
> > but it's clear that no deception was intended.
>
>
> Bingo, you got it, robw didn't. Let's face it, robw isn't very smart.
> He is fun to taunt, though, and he is my fanboi.
robw
2006-09-14 23:13:29 UTC
Permalink
It's only been a few days....


"Harold Burton" <***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-***@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> In article <AOednXy0C4dSKpXYnZ2dnUVZ_u-***@comcast.com>,
> "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > Know what?
> > You can debate me, ridicule my thoughts, call me moron, idiot, imbecile.
> > I can handle it.
> >
> > But you take my words and change them? (which, by the way, isn't going
to
> > sit real well with your conservative friends here.
> > i've been posting here for many years and changing headers is mildly
> > accepted. what you've done is moronic)
> >
> > You're done. And I know you probably wanted the attention.....but you
really
> > don't know. Trust me.
> >
> > Usually takes about two or three weeks.
> >
> > Screen name change, kill file, you think I'm not the only one that's
going
> > to have fun with you?
> >
> > I'll give you the same advice I've given to countless others.
> >
> > Know when you hear your conservative heroes be winning and witty and say
"I
> > could do that!"
> >
> > You can't.
>
>
> I did.
>
>
> > "Harold Burton" <***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:hal.i.burton-***@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> > > In article <***@comcast.com>,
> > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm a liberal because I am an uneducated, unenlightened person who
looks
> > at both
> > > > sides of things and makes a decision based on how I can best
confiscate
> > the
> > > > wealth of others.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > There, fixed it for ya.
Stan de SD
2006-09-15 23:55:44 UTC
Permalink
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:AOednXy0C4dSKpXYnZ2dnUVZ_u-***@comcast.com...
> Know what?
> You can debate me, ridicule my thoughts, call me moron, idiot, imbecile.
> I can handle it.

Apparently not, as you feel the need to tell us how "educated" and
"enlightened" you are. Wasamatta, scared to death that people here just
might come to another conclusion, based on the quality of your posts?
robw
2006-09-16 00:06:45 UTC
Permalink
Why did you snip my post?

Coward.


"Stan de SD" <***@covad.net> wrote in message
news:d1aa1$450b3d5f$45035f0d$***@msgid.meganewsservers.com...
>
> "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:AOednXy0C4dSKpXYnZ2dnUVZ_u-***@comcast.com...
> > Know what?
> > You can debate me, ridicule my thoughts, call me moron, idiot, imbecile.
> > I can handle it.
>
> Apparently not, as you feel the need to tell us how "educated" and
> "enlightened" you are. Wasamatta, scared to death that people here just
> might come to another conclusion, based on the quality of your posts?
>
>
Harold Burton
2006-09-16 01:59:28 UTC
Permalink
In article <bL6dnevO3r2V3ZbYnZ2dnUVZ_r-***@comcast.com>,
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:

> Why did you snip my post?


Cause he and I know it gets you foaming at the mouth?
robw
2006-09-16 02:37:33 UTC
Permalink
South Philly kids don't "foam at the mouth."

They take care of business.


"Harold Burton" <***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-***@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> In article <bL6dnevO3r2V3ZbYnZ2dnUVZ_r-***@comcast.com>,
> "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > Why did you snip my post?
>
>
> Cause he and I know it gets you foaming at the mouth?
Harold Burton
2006-09-16 02:55:42 UTC
Permalink
In article <***@comcast.com>,
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:

> South Philly kids don't "foam at the mouth."
>
> They take care of business.


So when am I going to start to suffer?



> "Harold Burton" <***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:hal.i.burton-***@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> > In article <bL6dnevO3r2V3ZbYnZ2dnUVZ_r-***@comcast.com>,
> > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Why did you snip my post?
> >
> >
> > Cause he and I know it gets you foaming at the mouth?
Stan de SD
2006-09-15 23:52:33 UTC
Permalink
"Harold Burton" <***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-***@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> In article <***@comcast.com>,
> "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > I'm a liberal because I am an uneducated, unenlightened person who looks
at both
> > sides of things and makes a decision based on how I can best confiscate
the
> > wealth of others.
>
> There, fixed it for ya.

ROFTLMAO!!!
robw
2006-09-16 00:03:45 UTC
Permalink
It would figure you'd admire cowardice.


"Stan de SD" <***@covad.net> wrote in message
news:5f59d$450b3ca0$45035f0d$***@msgid.meganewsservers.com...
>
> "Harold Burton" <***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:hal.i.burton-***@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> > In article <***@comcast.com>,
> > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm a liberal because I am an uneducated, unenlightened person who
looks
> at both
> > > sides of things and makes a decision based on how I can best
confiscate
> the
> > > wealth of others.
> >
> > There, fixed it for ya.
>
> ROFTLMAO!!!
>
>
Harold Burton
2006-09-16 02:13:57 UTC
Permalink
In article <***@comcast.com>,
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:

> It would figure you'd admire cowardice.

Actually it's admiring cleverness, well not really that much cleverness,
cause it doesn't take that much cleverness to troll a moron like you.


BTW, haven't you noticed that quite a few of your responses to my posts
never appeared in these newsgroups? You didn't miss them and neither
did anyone else. That pretty much sums up the value of your posts,
i.e. they're worthless.



> "Stan de SD" <***@covad.net> wrote in message
> news:5f59d$450b3ca0$45035f0d$***@msgid.meganewsservers.com...
> >
> > "Harold Burton" <***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:hal.i.burton-***@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> > > In article <***@comcast.com>,
> > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm a liberal because I am an uneducated, unenlightened person who
> looks
> > at both
> > > > sides of things and makes a decision based on how I can best
> confiscate
> > the
> > > > wealth of others.
> > >
> > > There, fixed it for ya.
> >
> > ROFTLMAO!!!
> >
> >
robw
2006-09-16 02:25:26 UTC
Permalink
First off, they showed up here.
That's all I care about.

And it's "clever" to change words and snip the rest of the post?

So you are an admitted troll.
Seen your kind before (and better done, Cuz) and always wanted to know what
you cats are about.

Here's a few questions I always welcome being asked, so I'm asking you:

Five favorite music groups or solo artists.
Five favorite movies
Favorite sport and team.
Five favorite writers...favorite works.

What sayeth you?






"Harold Burton" <***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-***@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> In article <***@comcast.com>,
> "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > It would figure you'd admire cowardice.
>
> Actually it's admiring cleverness, well not really that much cleverness,
> cause it doesn't take that much cleverness to troll a moron like you.
>
>
> BTW, haven't you noticed that quite a few of your responses to my posts
> never appeared in these newsgroups? You didn't miss them and neither
> did anyone else. That pretty much sums up the value of your posts,
> i.e. they're worthless.
>
>
>
> > "Stan de SD" <***@covad.net> wrote in message
> > news:5f59d$450b3ca0$45035f0d$***@msgid.meganewsservers.com...
> > >
> > > "Harold Burton" <***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > news:hal.i.burton-***@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> > > > In article <***@comcast.com>,
> > > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'm a liberal because I am an uneducated, unenlightened person who
> > looks
> > > at both
> > > > > sides of things and makes a decision based on how I can best
> > confiscate
> > > the
> > > > > wealth of others.
> > > >
> > > > There, fixed it for ya.
> > >
> > > ROFTLMAO!!!
> > >
> > >
Harold Burton
2006-09-16 02:32:50 UTC
Permalink
In article <***@comcast.com>,
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:

> First off, they showed up here.


A lot of them didn't. I love it, I point things out and still the fools
don't get it.


> That's all I care about.


You're in denial, many of your responses appeared only in alt.stupidity,
a very appropriate place for them.


> And it's "clever" to change words and snip the rest of the post?


Not clever at all, but it does make a point.


> So you are an admitted troll...


...who still has you on his hook.


> Seen your kind before (and better done, Cuz) and always wanted to know what
> you cats are about.
>
> Here's a few questions I always welcome being asked, so I'm asking you:
>
> Five favorite music groups or solo artists.
> Five favorite movies
> Favorite sport and team.
> Five favorite writers...favorite works.
>
> What sayeth you?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "Harold Burton" <***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:hal.i.burton-***@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> > In article <***@comcast.com>,
> > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> > > It would figure you'd admire cowardice.
> >
> > Actually it's admiring cleverness, well not really that much cleverness,
> > cause it doesn't take that much cleverness to troll a moron like you.
> >
> >
> > BTW, haven't you noticed that quite a few of your responses to my posts
> > never appeared in these newsgroups? You didn't miss them and neither
> > did anyone else. That pretty much sums up the value of your posts,
> > i.e. they're worthless.
> >
> >
> >
> > > "Stan de SD" <***@covad.net> wrote in message
> > > news:5f59d$450b3ca0$45035f0d$***@msgid.meganewsservers.com...
> > > >
> > > > "Harold Burton" <***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:hal.i.burton-***@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> > > > > In article <***@comcast.com>,
> > > > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I'm a liberal because I am an uneducated, unenlightened person who
> > > looks
> > > > at both
> > > > > > sides of things and makes a decision based on how I can best
> > > confiscate
> > > > the
> > > > > > wealth of others.
> > > > >
> > > > > There, fixed it for ya.
> > > >
> > > > ROFTLMAO!!!
> > > >
> > > >
robw
2006-09-16 02:42:50 UTC
Permalink
Why not answer the questions?


"Harold Burton" <***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-***@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> In article <***@comcast.com>,
> "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > First off, they showed up here.
>
>
> A lot of them didn't. I love it, I point things out and still the fools
> don't get it.
>
>
> > That's all I care about.
>
>
> You're in denial, many of your responses appeared only in alt.stupidity,
> a very appropriate place for them.
>
>
> > And it's "clever" to change words and snip the rest of the post?
>
>
> Not clever at all, but it does make a point.
>
>
> > So you are an admitted troll...
>
>
> ...who still has you on his hook.
>
>
> > Seen your kind before (and better done, Cuz) and always wanted to know
what
> > you cats are about.
> >
> > Here's a few questions I always welcome being asked, so I'm asking you:
> >
> > Five favorite music groups or solo artists.
> > Five favorite movies
> > Favorite sport and team.
> > Five favorite writers...favorite works.
> >
> > What sayeth you?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "Harold Burton" <***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:hal.i.burton-***@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> > > In article <***@comcast.com>,
> > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > It would figure you'd admire cowardice.
> > >
> > > Actually it's admiring cleverness, well not really that much
cleverness,
> > > cause it doesn't take that much cleverness to troll a moron like you.
> > >
> > >
> > > BTW, haven't you noticed that quite a few of your responses to my
posts
> > > never appeared in these newsgroups? You didn't miss them and neither
> > > did anyone else. That pretty much sums up the value of your posts,
> > > i.e. they're worthless.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > "Stan de SD" <***@covad.net> wrote in message
> > > > news:5f59d$450b3ca0$45035f0d$***@msgid.meganewsservers.com...
> > > > >
> > > > > "Harold Burton" <***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > > >
news:hal.i.burton-***@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> > > > > > In article <***@comcast.com>,
> > > > > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm a liberal because I am an uneducated, unenlightened person
who
> > > > looks
> > > > > at both
> > > > > > > sides of things and makes a decision based on how I can best
> > > > confiscate
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > wealth of others.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There, fixed it for ya.
> > > > >
> > > > > ROFTLMAO!!!
> > > > >
> > > > >
Harold Burton
2006-09-16 02:54:39 UTC
Permalink
In article <Z-mdnYQga4cA-***@comcast.com>,
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:

> Why not answer the questions?


Why?



> "Harold Burton" <***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:hal.i.burton-***@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> > In article <***@comcast.com>,
> > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> > > First off, they showed up here.
> >
> >
> > A lot of them didn't. I love it, I point things out and still the fools
> > don't get it.
> >
> >
> > > That's all I care about.
> >
> >
> > You're in denial, many of your responses appeared only in alt.stupidity,
> > a very appropriate place for them.
> >
> >
> > > And it's "clever" to change words and snip the rest of the post?
> >
> >
> > Not clever at all, but it does make a point.
> >
> >
> > > So you are an admitted troll...
> >
> >
> > ...who still has you on his hook.
> >
> >
> > > Seen your kind before (and better done, Cuz) and always wanted to know
> what
> > > you cats are about.
> > >
> > > Here's a few questions I always welcome being asked, so I'm asking you:
> > >
> > > Five favorite music groups or solo artists.
> > > Five favorite movies
> > > Favorite sport and team.
> > > Five favorite writers...favorite works.
> > >
> > > What sayeth you?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "Harold Burton" <***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > news:hal.i.burton-***@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> > > > In article <***@comcast.com>,
> > > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > It would figure you'd admire cowardice.
> > > >
> > > > Actually it's admiring cleverness, well not really that much
> cleverness,
> > > > cause it doesn't take that much cleverness to troll a moron like you.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > BTW, haven't you noticed that quite a few of your responses to my
> posts
> > > > never appeared in these newsgroups? You didn't miss them and neither
> > > > did anyone else. That pretty much sums up the value of your posts,
> > > > i.e. they're worthless.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > "Stan de SD" <***@covad.net> wrote in message
> > > > > news:5f59d$450b3ca0$45035f0d$***@msgid.meganewsservers.com...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Harold Burton" <***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > > > >
> news:hal.i.burton-***@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> > > > > > > In article <***@comcast.com>,
> > > > > > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I'm a liberal because I am an uneducated, unenlightened person
> who
> > > > > looks
> > > > > > at both
> > > > > > > > sides of things and makes a decision based on how I can best
> > > > > confiscate
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > wealth of others.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > There, fixed it for ya.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ROFTLMAO!!!
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
Harold Burton
2006-09-16 02:09:06 UTC
Permalink
In article <5f59d$450b3ca0$45035f0d$***@msgid.meganewsservers.com>,
"Stan de SD" <***@covad.net> wrote:

> "Harold Burton" <***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:hal.i.burton-***@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> > In article <***@comcast.com>,
> > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm a liberal because I am an uneducated, unenlightened person who looks
> at both
> > > sides of things and makes a decision based on how I can best confiscate
> the
> > > wealth of others.
> >
> > There, fixed it for ya.
>
> ROFTLMAO!!!


I've got robw foaming really good. It's rare you can not only hook a
leftwit but keep him on that hook for so long. robw is approaching a
personal record. My best before him was a throw away line about "Err
America" in or.politics about 6 months ago that had quite a few of them
on the line for several weeks. Trolling leftwits is so easy I almost
feel ashamed, but not enough to stop. :-) I wonder if robw has noticed
how many of his responses to my trolls have been redirected to
alt.stupidity so they never appear in these newsgroups. What's sad is
he claims to be 53 years old, old enough to know better.
robw
2006-09-16 02:31:16 UTC
Permalink
So you've engaged in a flame war where you either change the words or direct
the posts.

And you're bragging?

Geez Cuz, get a life.

Oh, that wasn;t foaming.
Your idiocy made me laugh and that was beer coming through my nose.
You know, when you're out with your friends and someone says something funny
just as you're taking a swig?

You do have friends? A significant other?

You are welcome to kill my posts all you want.

You've read them.




"Harold Burton" <***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-***@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> In article <5f59d$450b3ca0$45035f0d$***@msgid.meganewsservers.com>,
> "Stan de SD" <***@covad.net> wrote:
>
> > "Harold Burton" <***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:hal.i.burton-***@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> > > In article <***@comcast.com>,
> > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm a liberal because I am an uneducated, unenlightened person who
looks
> > at both
> > > > sides of things and makes a decision based on how I can best
confiscate
> > the
> > > > wealth of others.
> > >
> > > There, fixed it for ya.
> >
> > ROFTLMAO!!!
>
>
> I've got robw foaming really good. It's rare you can not only hook a
> leftwit but keep him on that hook for so long. robw is approaching a
> personal record. My best before him was a throw away line about "Err
> America" in or.politics about 6 months ago that had quite a few of them
> on the line for several weeks. Trolling leftwits is so easy I almost
> feel ashamed, but not enough to stop. :-) I wonder if robw has noticed
> how many of his responses to my trolls have been redirected to
> alt.stupidity so they never appear in these newsgroups. What's sad is
> he claims to be 53 years old, old enough to know better.
Harold Burton
2006-09-16 02:35:07 UTC
Permalink
In article <***@comcast.com>,
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:

> So you've engaged in a flame war where you either change the words or direct
> the posts.


Not at all.
The Pervert
2006-09-14 05:58:11 UTC
Permalink
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:***@comcast.com...
> I'm a liberal because I am an educated,enlightened person who looks at
both
> sides of things ...

Sorry, but I no longer believe that of you.
robw
2006-09-14 23:15:53 UTC
Permalink
Sorry, but I could give a flying f*ck.


"The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:***@comcast.com...
>
> "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:***@comcast.com...
> > I'm a liberal because I am an educated,enlightened person who looks at
> both
> > sides of things ...
>
> Sorry, but I no longer believe that of you.
>
>
>
Jafo
2006-09-14 08:19:01 UTC
Permalink
As viewed from alt.california, robw wrote:

>I'm a liberal because I am an educated,enlightened person who
>looks at both sides of things and makes a decision based on
>how things synch up with my beliefs.

Sort of the opposite of the scientific method. You begin with
a conclusion and use only those facts which appear to support
the conclusion.

--
Jafo
robw
2006-09-14 23:18:05 UTC
Permalink
You don't make decisions consistent with your beliefs?


"Jafo" <***@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
news:***@4ax.com...
> As viewed from alt.california, robw wrote:
>
> >I'm a liberal because I am an educated,enlightened person who
> >looks at both sides of things and makes a decision based on
> >how things synch up with my beliefs.
>
> Sort of the opposite of the scientific method. You begin with
> a conclusion and use only those facts which appear to support
> the conclusion.
>
> --
> Jafo
Stan de SD
2006-09-15 23:58:28 UTC
Permalink
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:***@comcast.com...
> You don't make decisions consistent with your beliefs?

This is all a bit over your head, isn't it?
>
>
> "Jafo" <***@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
> news:***@4ax.com...
> > As viewed from alt.california, robw wrote:
> >
> > >I'm a liberal because I am an educated,enlightened person who
> > >looks at both sides of things and makes a decision based on
> > >how things synch up with my beliefs.
> >
> > Sort of the opposite of the scientific method. You begin with
> > a conclusion and use only those facts which appear to support
> > the conclusion.
> >
> > --
> > Jafo
>
>
robw
2006-09-16 00:09:19 UTC
Permalink
Not at all.

I have my beliefs and am secure as to the reasons they exist.


"Stan de SD" <***@covad.net> wrote in message
news:dabc9$450b3e02$45035f0d$***@msgid.meganewsservers.com...
>
> "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:***@comcast.com...
> > You don't make decisions consistent with your beliefs?
>
> This is all a bit over your head, isn't it?
> >
> >
> > "Jafo" <***@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
> > news:***@4ax.com...
> > > As viewed from alt.california, robw wrote:
> > >
> > > >I'm a liberal because I am an educated,enlightened person who
> > > >looks at both sides of things and makes a decision based on
> > > >how things synch up with my beliefs.
> > >
> > > Sort of the opposite of the scientific method. You begin with
> > > a conclusion and use only those facts which appear to support
> > > the conclusion.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jafo
> >
> >
>
>
Stan de SD
2006-09-15 23:54:20 UTC
Permalink
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:***@comcast.com...
> I'm a liberal because I am an educated,enlightened person who looks at
both
> sides of things and makes a decision based on how things synch up with my
> beliefs.

If you were so "educated" and "enlighentened" you would be able to prove it
through the use of facts and logic, instead of thumping your own chest.
You're no different from the old hag who has to remind everyone else how
"beautiful" she is to calm her own insecurities... :O|
robw
2006-09-16 00:05:00 UTC
Permalink
Do you know what "clamoring" is?


"Stan de SD" <***@covad.net> wrote in message
news:bfcbb$450b3d0b$45035f0d$***@msgid.meganewsservers.com...
>
> "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:***@comcast.com...
> > I'm a liberal because I am an educated,enlightened person who looks at
> both
> > sides of things and makes a decision based on how things synch up with
my
> > beliefs.
>
> If you were so "educated" and "enlighentened" you would be able to prove
it
> through the use of facts and logic, instead of thumping your own chest.
> You're no different from the old hag who has to remind everyone else how
> "beautiful" she is to calm her own insecurities... :O|
>
>
Stan de SD
2006-09-13 21:00:32 UTC
Permalink
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:***@comcast.com...
> Yes.
> He is.
>
> Your thoughts?

Most historians blame Hitler and Tojo, but I guess that's the answer to be
expected from an knee-jerk hate-America type... :O|

>
>
> "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:***@comcast.com...
> >
> > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > news:***@comcast.com...
> >
> > > But is it not true?
> >
> > FDR was president on Dex 7, 1941 when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor. Is
he
> to
> > blame for WWII?
> >
> > Real simple.
> >
> >
> > > "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > >
> > > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > > Who was the president on 9-11?
> > > > >
> > > > > Real simple.
> > > >
> > > > If you want to reduced something so complex to a simplistic (and
> > > > incredibly stupid) question like that, you're not as smart as
> > > >I used to think you were.
> >
> >
>
>
Harold Burton
2006-09-13 21:42:08 UTC
Permalink
In article <14a34$45087158$45035f0d$***@msgid.meganewsservers.com>,
"Stan de SD" <***@covad.net> wrote:

> "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:***@comcast.com...
> > Yes.
> > He is.
> >
> > Your thoughts?
>
> Most historians blame Hitler and Tojo,


You might want to read The New Dealers' War by Fleming

From http://www.fff.org/freedom/0801g.asp (which is worth reading as a
good summary of The New Dealers' War)

"FDR¹s dream of a world set right by America has also remained a lasting
legacy of the New Deal, with U.S. political, military, and economic
intervention around the world for more than half a century. Indeed, the
policies that led America into both the Korean and the Vietnam Wars, the
Persian Gulf War, and the ethnic conflicts in Yugoslavia all have their
origin in the precedents set by FDR and his New Dealers."

We can now add Afghanistan and Iraq to the legacy of FDR and his New
Dealers.
robw
2006-09-13 23:13:01 UTC
Permalink
Actually, I think it goes back to Custer.

Moron.


"Harold Burton" <***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-***@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> In article <14a34$45087158$45035f0d$***@msgid.meganewsservers.com>,
> "Stan de SD" <***@covad.net> wrote:
>
> > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > Yes.
> > > He is.
> > >
> > > Your thoughts?
> >
> > Most historians blame Hitler and Tojo,
>
>
> You might want to read The New Dealers' War by Fleming
>
> From http://www.fff.org/freedom/0801g.asp (which is worth reading as a
> good summary of The New Dealers' War)
>
> "FDR¹s dream of a world set right by America has also remained a lasting
> legacy of the New Deal, with U.S. political, military, and economic
> intervention around the world for more than half a century. Indeed, the
> policies that led America into both the Korean and the Vietnam Wars, the
> Persian Gulf War, and the ethnic conflicts in Yugoslavia all have their
> origin in the precedents set by FDR and his New Dealers."
>
> We can now add Afghanistan and Iraq to the legacy of FDR and his New
> Dealers.
Harold Burton
2006-09-14 01:09:03 UTC
Permalink
In article <***@comcast.com>,
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:


> Moron.



What a cogent argument, but about what one expects from the left.
robw
2006-09-13 23:11:50 UTC
Permalink
I don't hate America.

I hate this administration.

But you're right, FDR did not start WWII.

Meanwhile, Busch attacked Iraq, which had nothing to do with 9-11.


"Stan de SD" <***@covad.net> wrote in message
news:14a34$45087158$45035f0d$***@msgid.meganewsservers.com...
>
> "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:***@comcast.com...
> > Yes.
> > He is.
> >
> > Your thoughts?
>
> Most historians blame Hitler and Tojo, but I guess that's the answer to be
> expected from an knee-jerk hate-America type... :O|
>
> >
> >
> > "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:***@comcast.com...
> > >
> > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > >
> > > > But is it not true?
> > >
> > > FDR was president on Dex 7, 1941 when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor. Is
> he
> > to
> > > blame for WWII?
> > >
> > > Real simple.
> > >
> > >
> > > > "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > >
> > > > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > > > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > > > Who was the president on 9-11?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Real simple.
> > > > >
> > > > > If you want to reduced something so complex to a simplistic (and
> > > > > incredibly stupid) question like that, you're not as smart as
> > > > >I used to think you were.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Harold Burton
2006-09-14 01:11:47 UTC
Permalink
In article <***@comcast.com>,
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:

> I don't hate America.
>
> I hate this administration.
>
> But you're right, FDR did not start WWII.



England and France did and FDR chose to save their asses.
robw
2006-09-14 01:49:24 UTC
Permalink
Busch invaded a country that did nothing to us.

And if Iraq had come up on your radar before, you would have heeded the
letters that many of us wrote on behalf of Amnesty International that was
trying to point out what a dick Saddam was.

But invading Iraq as a response to 9-11 was wrong.




"Harold Burton" <***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-***@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> In article <***@comcast.com>,
> "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > I don't hate America.
> >
> > I hate this administration.
> >
> > But you're right, FDR did not start WWII.
>
>
>
> England and France did and FDR chose to save their asses.
Harold Burton
2006-09-14 02:07:10 UTC
Permalink
In article <***@comcast.com>,
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:

> Busch invaded a country that did nothing to us.

England and France declared war on a country that did nothing to them
and FDR dragged us into a war to support them. It cost us hundreds of
thousands of American deaths. FDR is still considered a great American
because of it. I find it hard to find fault with Bush for several
thousand American deaths compared to the hundreds of thousands of
American deaths brought to us by FDR.


> And if Iraq had come up on your radar before, you would have heeded the
> letters that many of us wrote on behalf of Amnesty International that was
> trying to point out what a dick Saddam was.
>
> But invading Iraq as a response to 9-11 was wrong.
>
>
>
>
> "Harold Burton" <***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:hal.i.burton-***@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> > In article <***@comcast.com>,
> > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> > > I don't hate America.
> > >
> > > I hate this administration.
> > >
> > > But you're right, FDR did not start WWII.
> >
> >
> >
> > England and France did and FDR chose to save their asses.
robw
2006-09-14 03:46:05 UTC
Permalink
What's your hard on with FDR, Cuz?


"Harold Burton" <***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-***@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> In article <***@comcast.com>,
> "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > Busch invaded a country that did nothing to us.
>
> England and France declared war on a country that did nothing to them
> and FDR dragged us into a war to support them. It cost us hundreds of
> thousands of American deaths. FDR is still considered a great American
> because of it. I find it hard to find fault with Bush for several
> thousand American deaths compared to the hundreds of thousands of
> American deaths brought to us by FDR.
>
>
> > And if Iraq had come up on your radar before, you would have heeded the
> > letters that many of us wrote on behalf of Amnesty International that
was
> > trying to point out what a dick Saddam was.
> >
> > But invading Iraq as a response to 9-11 was wrong.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "Harold Burton" <***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:hal.i.burton-***@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> > > In article <***@comcast.com>,
> > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I don't hate America.
> > > >
> > > > I hate this administration.
> > > >
> > > > But you're right, FDR did not start WWII.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > England and France did and FDR chose to save their asses.
Stan de SD
2006-09-16 00:02:05 UTC
Permalink
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:***@comcast.com...
> I don't hate America.
>
> I hate this administration.

But you would be happy for us to lose the war on terror as long as it
provides a political defeat for bush and a benefit for your side, right?

Tell us what comes first in your book of values, Robbie: the safety and
security of our country by supporting and winning the war against
Islamofascism, or the political defeat of George W Bush?

> Meanwhile, Busch attacked Iraq, which had nothing to do with 9-11.

And who here has stated that Iraq or Saddam was involved in 9-11? Or is this
deliberate distortion of the facts necessary for you to win your argument?
robw
2006-09-16 00:17:13 UTC
Permalink
What is "islamofacism"?

Oh yeah, Busch's new "brand name" for the failed "war" in Iraq.

Now if you ask me "National security or bringing down Busch." I'll take the
security. Busch will be gone in two years, anyway.

But not at the cost of a corrupt administration waging a "war" on a country
that had nothing to do with 9-11. Not at the cost of civil liberties. look,
if you can;t afford toilet tissue go to a dollar store. But please don't
wipe your arse with the Constitution.








"Stan de SD" <***@covad.net> wrote in message
news:9c113$450b3edc$45035f0d$***@msgid.meganewsservers.com...
>
> "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:***@comcast.com...
> > I don't hate America.
> >
> > I hate this administration.
>
> But you would be happy for us to lose the war on terror as long as it
> provides a political defeat for bush and a benefit for your side, right?
>
> Tell us what comes first in your book of values, Robbie: the safety and
> security of our country by supporting and winning the war against
> Islamofascism, or the political defeat of George W Bush?
>
> > Meanwhile, Busch attacked Iraq, which had nothing to do with 9-11.
>
> And who here has stated that Iraq or Saddam was involved in 9-11? Or is
this
> deliberate distortion of the facts necessary for you to win your argument?
>
>
>
>
Harold Burton
2006-09-16 02:14:41 UTC
Permalink
In article <9c113$450b3edc$45035f0d$***@msgid.meganewsservers.com>,
"Stan de SD" <***@covad.net> wrote:

> "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:***@comcast.com...
> > I don't hate America.
> >
> > I hate this administration.
>
> But you would be happy for us to lose the war on terror as long as it
> provides a political defeat for bush and a benefit for your side, right?



Bingo!!!
robw
2006-09-16 02:38:23 UTC
Permalink
Where you playing at the fire hall with Mom and her friends?

Hope you won a lot of money.


"Harold Burton" <***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-***@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> In article <9c113$450b3edc$45035f0d$***@msgid.meganewsservers.com>,
> "Stan de SD" <***@covad.net> wrote:
>
> > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > I don't hate America.
> > >
> > > I hate this administration.
> >
> > But you would be happy for us to lose the war on terror as long as it
> > provides a political defeat for bush and a benefit for your side, right?
>
>
>
> Bingo!!!
Harold Burton
2006-09-16 02:54:12 UTC
Permalink
In article <0dGdnRFy_7oP_pbYnZ2dnUVZ_v-***@comcast.com>,
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:

> Where (sic) you playing at the fire hall with Mom and her friends?


No, I was investing in Exxon Mobile


> Hope you won a lot of money.


A hell of a lot and it's taxed at only 15%.


> "Harold Burton" <***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:hal.i.burton-***@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> > In article <9c113$450b3edc$45035f0d$***@msgid.meganewsservers.com>,
> > "Stan de SD" <***@covad.net> wrote:
> >
> > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > I don't hate America.
> > > >
> > > > I hate this administration.
> > >
> > > But you would be happy for us to lose the war on terror as long as it
> > > provides a political defeat for bush and a benefit for your side, right?
> >
> >
> >
> > Bingo!!!
Stan de SD
2006-09-11 20:15:03 UTC
Permalink
"The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:***@comcast.com...
>
> "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:***@comcast.com...
> > Who was the president on 9-11?
> >
> > Real simple.
>
> If you want to reduced something so complex to a simplistic (and
incredibly
> stupid) question like that, you're not as smart as I used to think you
were.

You used to think he was smart? ;O)
robw
2006-09-12 00:04:51 UTC
Permalink
Have fun.

Remember how everyone (except us) thought Busch was so great five years ago
today?

How's that working out?


"Stan de SD" <***@covad.net> wrote in message
news:e582d$4505c3b3$45035f0d$***@msgid.meganewsservers.com...
>
> "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:***@comcast.com...
> >
> > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > Who was the president on 9-11?
> > >
> > > Real simple.
> >
> > If you want to reduced something so complex to a simplistic (and
> incredibly
> > stupid) question like that, you're not as smart as I used to think you
> were.
>
> You used to think he was smart? ;O)
>
>
Stan de SD
2006-09-13 21:04:14 UTC
Permalink
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:ZvKdnftHa-***@comcast.com...
> Have fun.
>
> Remember how everyone (except us) thought Busch was so great five years
ago
> today?

I NEVER thought Busch was all that great - it was always a cheap beer from a
company whose products never especially impressed me.

You weren't referring to George W BUSH, by any chance, were you? In case you
didn't know already, he was the president on 9/11/2001. ;O)
robw
2006-09-13 23:21:06 UTC
Permalink
Wow, that was witty.

And I believe that people are pissed at me in another thread (one you've
been involved in) where I pointed out Busch was president on 9-11.


"Stan de SD" <***@covad.net> wrote in message
news:10dc2$45087236$45035f0d$***@msgid.meganewsservers.com...
>
> "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:ZvKdnftHa-***@comcast.com...
> > Have fun.
> >
> > Remember how everyone (except us) thought Busch was so great five years
> ago
> > today?
>
> I NEVER thought Busch was all that great - it was always a cheap beer from
a
> company whose products never especially impressed me.
>
> You weren't referring to George W BUSH, by any chance, were you? In case
you
> didn't know already, he was the president on 9/11/2001. ;O)
>
>
The Pervert
2006-09-14 06:05:24 UTC
Permalink
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:mq2dnSx7d-***@comcast.com...

> Wow, that was witty.

Just like spelling his name Busch?
robw
2006-09-14 23:19:28 UTC
Permalink
That's done as a show of disrespect.


"The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:***@comcast.com...
>
> "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:mq2dnSx7d-***@comcast.com...
>
> > Wow, that was witty.
>
> Just like spelling his name Busch?
>
>
>
>
Harold Burton
2006-09-15 01:04:55 UTC
Permalink
In article <***@comcast.com>,
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:

> That's done as a show of ignorance.


Yep.


> "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:***@comcast.com...
> >
> > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > news:mq2dnSx7d-***@comcast.com...
> >
> > > Wow, that was witty.
> >
> > Just like spelling his name Busch?
The Pervert
2006-09-15 01:38:31 UTC
Permalink
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:***@comcast.com...
> That's done as a show of disrespect.

Seems more like a show of childishness.


Oh, that's right. You don't give a fuck, but you won't spell that word
right either.

> > > "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > >
> > > > There was a time when I thought you had some reason and
intelligence.

> > > > I acknowledge my error.

I once thought you had maturity, too.

> > > > I acknowledge my error.

That's done as s show of reality.
Harold Burton
2006-09-15 02:02:32 UTC
Permalink
In article <J6-***@comcast.com>,
"The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote:

> "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:***@comcast.com...
> > That's done as a show of disrespect.


> Seems more like a show of childishness.


You got robw pegged.
robw
2006-09-15 03:03:36 UTC
Permalink
I think it's quite childish, no less cowardly, to change the words in
people's posts.

It's only day two and you're already in trouble.


"Harold Burton" <***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-***@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> In article <J6-***@comcast.com>,
> "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > That's done as a show of disrespect.
>
>
> > Seems more like a show of childishness.
>
>
> You got robw pegged.
Harold Burton
2006-09-15 11:10:34 UTC
Permalink
In article <***@comcast.com>,
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:

> I think...


No you don't.
robw
2006-09-15 02:58:52 UTC
Permalink
I'm so sorry I've let you down.


"The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:J6-***@comcast.com...
>
> "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:***@comcast.com...
> > That's done as a show of disrespect.
>
> Seems more like a show of childishness.
>
>
> Oh, that's right. You don't give a fuck, but you won't spell that word
> right either.
>
> > > > "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > >
> > > > > There was a time when I thought you had some reason and
> intelligence.
>
> > > > > I acknowledge my error.
>
> I once thought you had maturity, too.
>
> > > > > I acknowledge my error.
>
> That's done as s show of reality.
>
>
The Pervert
2006-09-15 07:52:47 UTC
Permalink
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:***@comcast.com...
> I'm so sorry I've let you down.

No you're not.


> "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:J6-***@comcast.com...
> >
> > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > That's done as a show of disrespect.
> >
> > Seems more like a show of childishness.
> >
> >
> > Oh, that's right. You don't give a fuck, but you won't spell that word
> > right either.
> >
> > > > > "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > >
> > > > > > There was a time when I thought you had some reason and
> > intelligence.
> >
> > > > > > I acknowledge my error.
> >
> > I once thought you had maturity, too.
> >
> > > > > > I acknowledge my error.
> >
> > That's done as s show of reality.
robw
2006-09-15 16:36:44 UTC
Permalink
You're right.


"The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:***@comcast.com...
>
> "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:***@comcast.com...
> > I'm so sorry I've let you down.
>
> No you're not.
>
>
> > "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:J6-***@comcast.com...
> > >
> > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > That's done as a show of disrespect.
> > >
> > > Seems more like a show of childishness.
> > >
> > >
> > > Oh, that's right. You don't give a fuck, but you won't spell that
word
> > > right either.
> > >
> > > > > > "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > > > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > There was a time when I thought you had some reason and
> > > intelligence.
> > >
> > > > > > > I acknowledge my error.
> > >
> > > I once thought you had maturity, too.
> > >
> > > > > > > I acknowledge my error.
> > >
> > > That's done as s show of reality.
>
>
The Pervert
2006-09-15 20:04:37 UTC
Permalink
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:***@comcast.com...

> You're right.

I know. Get used to it.
robw
2006-09-15 23:39:28 UTC
Permalink
Even a watch.......


"The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:***@comcast.com...
>
> "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:***@comcast.com...
>
> > You're right.
>
> I know. Get used to it.
>
>
Harold Burton
2006-09-11 01:40:30 UTC
Permalink
In article <***@comcast.com>,
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:

> Who was the president on 9-11?



A simple google search would tell you. Too bad you're too stupid to
manage even that.
Stan de SD
2006-09-11 16:42:19 UTC
Permalink
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:***@comcast.com...
> Who was the president on 9-11?
>
> Real simple.

The president on 9/11/2001 was George Bush - I certainly didn't deny that.
Do you deny that OBL started planning his attack long before Bush was
inaugurated? Do you deny that there were terror attacks directed at the US
during the 1990's? Do you deny that Clinton did indeed miss opportunities to
get OBL?

One of the reasons that the Left is apoplectic about this ABC movie is that
it apparently threatens their contrived spin that everything was in control
on Clinton's watch, but that Islamic terrorism suddenly became a problem
because Bush wound up in office. The "Blame Bush on Everything" mentality is
propagated by individuals more obsessed with their own personal political
power than resolving the issues at hand.

> "Stan de SD" <***@covad.net> wrote in message
> news:5bbb7$4504a2cc$45035f0d$***@msgid.meganewsservers.com...
> >
> > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > Lame response.
> > > You got nothing so you go for ng etiquette?
> >
> > Let me guess. You know nothing about what Sandy Berger did, correct?
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > "Stan de SD" <***@covad.net> wrote in message
> > > news:ab18$45046b6b$45035f0d$***@msgid.meganewsservers.com...
> > > >
> > > > "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > >
> > > > > "Angry Young Man!" <***@bush.net> wrote in message
> > > > > news:4HFMg.17427$%***@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Jafo" <***@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
> > > > > > news:***@4ax.com...
> > > > > > > As viewed from alt.california, Angry Young Man! wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >>"Jafo" wrote...
> > > > > > >>>the PacBell Poster wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>Bill Clinton, "did a good job of stopping a second attack on
> > > > > > >>>>the World Trade Center when he was president."
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >>>He got out just in time, didn't he?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >>He gave Bush the Intel.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It was probably all stuffed in Sandy Berger's pants. :)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Jafo
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Berger didn't stuff ANYTHING in his pants.
> > > > >
> > > > > You checked personally?
> > > > >
> > > > > Anyway, wasn't he the one who admitted to doing it... in his
pants,
> > that
> > > > is?
> > > >
> > > > Funny how Travis Campbell AKA the Pac Bell Poster can't mask his own
> > > > stupidity, even with 50+ name changes to his credit... :O|
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
robw
2006-09-11 17:02:50 UTC
Permalink
I'm sure that OBL was planning the attack during Clinton's term.
Just as I'm sure the first WTC attack was planned under Busch Uno.

But let me ask you this.....we've seen how many high level al-Qaeda leaders
eliminated in one way or another?

Has it stopped terrorism?

Capturing OLB in the nineties would have eliminated little. Someone else
would have stepped up and pulled off some routine or another.

Many of you vigorously tell us that there are many groups in different parts
of the world that want to do this country harm.






"Stan de SD" <***@covad.net> wrote in message
news:e0b76$450591db$45035f0d$***@msgid.meganewsservers.com...
>
> "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:***@comcast.com...
> > Who was the president on 9-11?
> >
> > Real simple.
>
> The president on 9/11/2001 was George Bush - I certainly didn't deny that.
> Do you deny that OBL started planning his attack long before Bush was
> inaugurated? Do you deny that there were terror attacks directed at the US
> during the 1990's? Do you deny that Clinton did indeed miss opportunities
to
> get OBL?
>
> One of the reasons that the Left is apoplectic about this ABC movie is
that
> it apparently threatens their contrived spin that everything was in
control
> on Clinton's watch, but that Islamic terrorism suddenly became a problem
> because Bush wound up in office. The "Blame Bush on Everything" mentality
is
> propagated by individuals more obsessed with their own personal political
> power than resolving the issues at hand.
>
> > "Stan de SD" <***@covad.net> wrote in message
> > news:5bbb7$4504a2cc$45035f0d$***@msgid.meganewsservers.com...
> > >
> > > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > Lame response.
> > > > You got nothing so you go for ng etiquette?
> > >
> > > Let me guess. You know nothing about what Sandy Berger did, correct?
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "Stan de SD" <***@covad.net> wrote in message
> > > > news:ab18$45046b6b$45035f0d$***@msgid.meganewsservers.com...
> > > > >
> > > > > "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > > > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Angry Young Man!" <***@bush.net> wrote in message
> > > > > > news:4HFMg.17427$%***@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "Jafo" <***@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
> > > > > > > news:***@4ax.com...
> > > > > > > > As viewed from alt.california, Angry Young Man! wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >>"Jafo" wrote...
> > > > > > > >>>the PacBell Poster wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>>Bill Clinton, "did a good job of stopping a second attack
on
> > > > > > > >>>>the World Trade Center when he was president."
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >>>He got out just in time, didn't he?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >>He gave Bush the Intel.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > It was probably all stuffed in Sandy Berger's pants. :)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Jafo
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Berger didn't stuff ANYTHING in his pants.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You checked personally?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Anyway, wasn't he the one who admitted to doing it... in his
> pants,
> > > that
> > > > > is?
> > > > >
> > > > > Funny how Travis Campbell AKA the Pac Bell Poster can't mask his
own
> > > > > stupidity, even with 50+ name changes to his credit... :O|
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Stan de SD
2006-09-11 19:56:02 UTC
Permalink
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:***@comcast.com...
> I'm sure that OBL was planning the attack during Clinton's term.
> Just as I'm sure the first WTC attack was planned under Busch Uno.
>
> But let me ask you this.....we've seen how many high level al-Qaeda
leaders
> eliminated in one way or another?
>
> Has it stopped terrorism?

Capturing (or better bey, killing) terrorist leaders in itself won't
eliminate terrorist, but it disrupts their command and control, and makes
them less effective.

Do you have a better approach? Appeasement certainly doesn't work - neither
does sticking your head in the sand, and hoping it will somehow go away.

Do you think blaming Bush for everything is the solution?

For 5 years we have been listening to you Lefty Liberal assholes whine, cry,
piss, and moan about how terrible Bush, Cheney, and America in general are.
You got a better idea on how to fight terrorism? Or are you just intent on
verbalizing your collective vaginal pains? Come on, let's hear it... :O|
robw
2006-09-12 00:03:38 UTC
Permalink
It "disrupts" the day it takes for someone new to be in charge.

And you want to know something , in all honesty?
I don't know what it will take to stop terrorism.

But I do know that the money wasted invading a country that had nothing to
do with 9-11 would have been better spent on securing this country's safety.

And what has this "war" accomplished?
It's made Iraq a training ground for terrorists.

It's cost thousands of American lives.

In the words of past Eagles running back Ricky Waters..."For who, for what"?







"Stan de SD" <***@covad.net> wrote in message
news:12fd5$4505bf40$45035f0d$***@msgid.meganewsservers.com...
>
> "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:***@comcast.com...
> > I'm sure that OBL was planning the attack during Clinton's term.
> > Just as I'm sure the first WTC attack was planned under Busch Uno.
> >
> > But let me ask you this.....we've seen how many high level al-Qaeda
> leaders
> > eliminated in one way or another?
> >
> > Has it stopped terrorism?
>
> Capturing (or better bey, killing) terrorist leaders in itself won't
> eliminate terrorist, but it disrupts their command and control, and makes
> them less effective.
>
> Do you have a better approach? Appeasement certainly doesn't work -
neither
> does sticking your head in the sand, and hoping it will somehow go away.
>
> Do you think blaming Bush for everything is the solution?
>
> For 5 years we have been listening to you Lefty Liberal assholes whine,
cry,
> piss, and moan about how terrible Bush, Cheney, and America in general
are.
> You got a better idea on how to fight terrorism? Or are you just intent on
> verbalizing your collective vaginal pains? Come on, let's hear it... :O|
>
>
The Pervert
2006-09-12 01:09:20 UTC
Permalink
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:***@comcast.com...
> I'm sure that OBL was planning the attack during Clinton's term.
> Just as I'm sure the first WTC attack was planned under Busch Uno.
>
> But let me ask you this.....we've seen how many high level al-Qaeda
leaders
> eliminated in one way or another?
>
> Has it stopped terrorism?
>
> Capturing OLB in the nineties would have eliminated little. Someone else
> would have stepped up and pulled off some routine or another.


If GWB were gone, would the world's problem go away? And yet would you
object to a change? Do you think things might change when somebody else is
in the White House?

Or will somebody else just step up and pull off some routine or another.
robw
2006-09-12 01:34:04 UTC
Permalink
I would hope that someone else would not invade a country because they said
that the oppose had WMD (not really true) or supported the terrorists that
caused 9-11 (a Senate intelligence Committee has proven this untrue)

Bad week for you guys.


"The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:_4ydnXQR5eG-lJvYnZ2dnUVZ_v-***@comcast.com...
>
> "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:***@comcast.com...
> > I'm sure that OBL was planning the attack during Clinton's term.
> > Just as I'm sure the first WTC attack was planned under Busch Uno.
> >
> > But let me ask you this.....we've seen how many high level al-Qaeda
> leaders
> > eliminated in one way or another?
> >
> > Has it stopped terrorism?
> >
> > Capturing OLB in the nineties would have eliminated little. Someone else
> > would have stepped up and pulled off some routine or another.
>
>
> If GWB were gone, would the world's problem go away? And yet would you
> object to a change? Do you think things might change when somebody else
is
> in the White House?
>
> Or will somebody else just step up and pull off some routine or another.
>
>
Harold Burton
2006-09-12 01:48:22 UTC
Permalink
In article <***@comcast.com>,
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote:

> I would hope that someone else would not invade a country because they said
> that the oppose had WMD...

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to
develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them.
That is our bottom line."
~ President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998 during the Clinton Administation

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear.
We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass
destruction program."
~ President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998 during the Clinton Administation

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great
deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use
nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the
greatest security threat we face."
~ Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998 during the Clinton Administation

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten
times since 1983."
~ Sandy Berger, Clinton's National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998.

"We urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the
U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if
appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond
effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of
mass destruction programs."
~ Letter to President Clinton, signed by Democrat Senators Carl Levin,
Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998, during the Clinton
Administation

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of Mass
destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and
he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
~ Representative Nancy Pelosi (Democrat, CA), Dec. 16, 1998, during the
Clinton Administation

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass
destruction and palaces for his cronies."
~ Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999 during
the Clinton Administation

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his
weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear
programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In
addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless
using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range
missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
~ Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (Democrat, FL,)
and others, Dec, 5, 2001.


"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the
mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass
destruction and the means of delivering them."
~ Senator Carl Levin (Democrat, Michigan), September 19, 2002.

"We know that he [Saddam Hussein] has stored secret supplies of
biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
~ former vice president, Al Gore, September 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to
deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam
is in power."
~ former vice president, Al Gore, September 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and
developing weapons of mass destruction."
~ Senator Ted Kennedy (Democrat, Massachusetts), September 27, 2002.

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are
confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and
biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to
build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence
reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
~ Senator Robert Byrd (Democrat, West Virginia), October 3, 2002.

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the
authority to use force-- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein
because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction
in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
~ Senator John F. Kerry (Democrat, Massachusetts), October 9, 2002.

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working
aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear
weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have
always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of
weapons of mass destruction."
~ Senator Jay Rockefeller (Democrat, West Virginia), October 10, 2002,

"He [Saddam Hussein] has systematically violated, over the course of the
past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he
disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear
capacity. This he has refused to do."
~ Representative Henry Waxman (Democrat, California), Oct. 10, 2002.

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show
that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological
weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program.
He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including
al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam
Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and
chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
~ Senator Hillary Clinton (Democrat, New York), October 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that
Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing
capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
~ Senator Bob Graham (Democrat, Florida), December 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal,
murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime... He presents a
particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to
his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass
destruction ...
So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real
..."
~ Senator John F. Kerry (Democrat, Massachusetts), January 23. 2003.
The Pervert
2006-09-12 02:55:39 UTC
Permalink
"robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:***@comcast.com...
> I would hope that someone else would not invade a country because they
said
> that the oppose had WMD (not really true) or supported the terrorists that
> caused 9-11 (a Senate intelligence Committee has proven this untrue)
>
> Bad week for you guys.

Who is "you guys?"

You also avoided answering the questions. Why is that?


> "The Pervert" <***@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:_4ydnXQR5eG-lJvYnZ2dnUVZ_v-***@comcast.com...
> >
> > "robw" <***@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > news:***@comcast.com...
> > > I'm sure that OBL was planning the attack during Clinton's term.
> > > Just as I'm sure the first WTC attack was planned under Busch Uno.
> > >
> > > But let me ask you this.....we've seen how many high level al-Qaeda
> > leaders
> > > eliminated in one way or another?
> > >
> > > Has it stopped terrorism?
> > >
> > > Capturing OLB in the nineties would have eliminated little. Someone
else
> > > would have stepped up and pulled off some routine or another.
> >
> >
> > If GWB were gone, would the world's problem go away? And yet would you
> > object to a change? Do you think things might change when somebody else
> is
> > in the White House?
> >
> > Or will somebody else just step up and pull off some routine or another.
> >
> >
>
>
Loading...